New Actors on Stage: Analysis of the Emergent Forms of Collective Action in the European Context

Dora Fonseca

Department of Sociology, Faculty of Economics, Centre for Social Studies (CES), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2014.21005                

Abstract

In this article our focus will be on civil society’s responses triggered by the imposition of the societies of austerity. The analysis will be centred on an emerging collective actor, the indignados, and on the conditions that fostered its formation and processes involved in the construction of its identity. To accomplish this task, we retrieved Ernesto Laclau’s political logic of populism and the concept of political developed by Chantal Mouffe and applied them to the formation of the indignados’ identity. This process is conceived in terms of the construction of antagonistic frontiers which divide the social into two opposing fields. This conception allows us to develop an analysis based on the notion of social conflict, as well as a reflection on the potentialities embodied by this new social actor, despite their presentation by the dominant discourse as utopic and therefore impossible. In this proposal, it is our aim to provide a better understanding of what is at stake when we talk about the indignados and a clearer perception of the political dimension of both struggle and resistance.

Keywords

Antagonism; Antagonistic Frontier; Civil Society; Conflict; Crisis; State

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Ferreira, A.C. (2012) Sociedade de Austeridade e direito do trabalho de exceção. Vida Económica—Editorial, Porto.
[2]	Cohen, J.L. and Arato, A. (2000) Sociedad civil y teoría política. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México.
[3]	Carroll, W.K. (2010) Crisis, movements, counter-hegemony: In search of the new. Interface, 2, 168-198. http://interfacejournal.nuim.ie/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Interface-2-2-pp.168-198-Carroll.pdf
[4]	Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the prison notebooks. International Publishers, New York.
[5]	Gramsci, A. (1974) Obras escolhidas. Vol. 1, Editorial Estampa, Lisboa.
[6]	Melucci, A. (1996) Challenging codes. Collective action in the information age. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[7]	Tarrow, S. (1998) Power and movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813245
[8]	Estanque, E. (2012) A classe média: Ascensão e declínio. Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos, Lisboa.
[9]	Eder, K. (1993) The new politics of class: Social movements and cultural dynamics in advanced societies. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
[10]	Laclau, E. (2010) La razón populista. Fondo de Cultura Económica de Argentina S.A., Buenos Aires.
[11]	Mouffe, C. (2007) En torno a lo Político. Fondo de Cultura Económica de Argentina S.A., Buenos Aires.
[12]	Touraine, A. (1981) The voice and the eye: An analysis of social movements. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[13]	Touraine, A. (1984) Le retour de l’acteur. Fayard, Paris.
[14]	Collins, R. (1975) Conflict sociology. Academic Press, New York.
[15]	Rancière, J. (1996) El desacuerdo: Política y filosofía. Nueva Visión, Buenos Aires.
[16]	Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (2010) Hegemonía y estrategia socialista: Hacia una radicalización de la democracia. Fondo de Cultura Económica de Argentina S.A., Buenos Aires.
[17]	Habermas, J. (1984) The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Beacon Press, Boston.
[18]	Habermas, J. (1987) The theory of communicative action. Life world and system. A critique of functionalist reason. Vol. 2, Beacon Press, Boston.
[19]	Norval, A.J. (1994) Social ambiguity and the crisis of apartheid. In: Laclau, E., Ed., The Making of Political Identities, Verso, London, 115-137.
[20]	Marcuse, H. (2007) One-dimensional man. Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Routledge, London.