University Curriculum—Recent Philosophical Reflections and Practical Implementations

Juha Himanka

Faculty of Arts, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2013.412A2015                

Abstract

Philosophers Martha Nussbaum and Alasdair MacIntyre have recently made a discussion on the university curriculum. MacIntyre formulated the problem in the following way: “a surprising number of the major disorders of the latter part of the twentieth century and the first decade of the twenty-first century have been brought about by some of the most distinguished graduates of some of the most distinguished universities in the world”. The problem is that these universities give inadequate general education. The situation even seems to be getting worse as Nussbaum is concerned about the direction that curriculum design has recently taken in some parts of the world. In this article, however, I will cite a few examples of university curriculum design that give some promising solutions to the problems posed by philosophers. Especially the new Common Core Curriculum of the University of Hong Kong offers possibilities that might lead the way to a new and more responsible manner of designing a university curriculum.

Keywords

niversity; Curriculum; Education; Globalization

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Aristotle. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/
[2]	Himanka (2012). The University as a community of selves, Johan Vilhelm Snellman’s “On Academic Studies”. Higher Education, 64, 517-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9508-5
[3]	Heidegger, M. (2005). Phanomenologische interpretationen ausgewahlter abhandlungen des aristoteles zur ontologie und logik. Frankfulrt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
[4]	University of Hong Kong (2013). Common Core Curriculum, Student Handbook 2013-2014. http://commoncore.hku.hk/files/cc13-lowres.pdf
[5]	ILO (2010). Global employment trends. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_elm/---trends/documents/publication/wcms_120471.pdf
[6]	Kolman, J. (1999). http://www.derivativesstrategy.com/magazine/archive/1999/0499fea1.asp
[7]	Lewis, M. (1989). Liar’s poker, rising through the wreckage on Wall Street. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
[8]	Lewis, M. (1999). How the eggheads cracked. New York Times, 24 January1999.
[9]	Lindenberger, H. (1990). On the sacrality of reading lists: The western culture debate at Stanford University. http://www.pbs.org/shattering/lindenberger.html
[10]	Lowenstein, R. (2000). When genius failed, the rise and fall of longterm capital management. New York: Random House.
[11]	MacIntyre, A. (2009). The very idea of a university: Aristotle, Newman, and Us. British Journal of Educational Studies, 4, 347-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2009.00443.x
[12]	Newman, J. H. (1852). The idea of university. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
[13]	Nussbaum, M. C., (2010). Nor for profit, why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
[14]	Pedersen, O. (1997). The first universities: Studium generale and the origins of university. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[15]	Plato. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/
[16]	SUES report (2012). The study of undergraduate education at Stanford University. http://www.stanford.edu/dept/undergrad/sues/report.html