Engaging in Social Action at Work: Demographic Differences in Participation
Aimee Dars Ellis
Ithaca College, Ithaca, USA.
DOI: 10.4236/jhrss.2013.14009   PDF    HTML     3,323 Downloads   6,153 Views  


Many organizations are utilizing corporate social responsibility initiatives that require employee participation. These initiatives, which involve social action at work (SAW), can be a source of reputational gains, benefit the community, and increase employee organizational identification [1]. Although research has been conducted on employee volunteer programs (EVP), one aspect of SAW, those studies have not identified the characteristics of employees who are most likely to participate in EVP nor have they considered the wide range of SAW programs. In the field of Sociology, extensive research has been conducted to identify characteristics of volunteers, but these volunteer programs are outside the context of CSR initiatives. This research addresses this gap by identifying the characteristics of enployees who engage in SAW across a wide range of activities. The results of the study can help hone future research questions and aid practitioners in developing and marketing SAW programs that resonate with employees and maximize participation for the good of the employees, organization, and community as a whole.

Share and Cite:

Dars Ellis, A. (2013) Engaging in Social Action at Work: Demographic Differences in Participation. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 1, 60-67. doi: 10.4236/jhrss.2013.14009.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] A. D. Ellis, “The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes and Behaviors,” The 68th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, 7-9 August 2009.
[2] A. D. Ellis, “Opportunities for Personal Social Action in the For-Profit Organization,” The 67th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, 8-13 August 2008.
[3] J. E. Booth, K. W. Park and T. M. Glomb, “Emplo-yerSupported Volunteering Benefits: Gift Exchange among Employers, Employees, and Volunteer Organizations,” Human Resource Management, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2009, pp. 227-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20277
[4] D. de Gilder, T. N. M. Schuyt and M. Breedijk, “Effects of an Employee Volunteering Program on the Work Force: The ABN-AMRO Case,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 61, No. 2, 2005, pp. 143-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-7101-x
[5] J. Peloza and D. N. Hassay, “Intra-Organizational Volunteerism: Good Soldiers, Good Deeds and Good Politics,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 64, No. 4, 2006, pp. 357-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-5496-z
[6] D. K. Peterson, “Benefits of Participation in Corporate Volunteer Programs: Employees’ Perceptions,” Personnel Review, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2004, pp. 615-627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00483480410561510
[7] M. S. Granovetter, “Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, No. 6, 1973, pp. 1360-1380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/225469
[8] J. M. Podolny and J. N. Baron, “Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 62, No. 5, 1997, pp. 673-693.
[9] M. Dixon and V. J. Roscigno, “Status, Networks, and Social Movement Participation: The Case of Striking Workers,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 108, No. 6, 2003, pp. 1292-1327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/375198
[10] D. McAdam and R. Paulsen, “Specifying the Relationship between Social Ties and Activism,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 99, No. 3, 1993, pp. 640-667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/230319
[11] P. Oliver, “If You Don’t Do It, Nobody Else Will: Active and Token Contributors to Local Collective Action,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 49, No. 5, 1984, pp. 601-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095418
[12] R. Shemtov, “Social Networks and Sustained Activism in Local NIMBY Campaigns,” Sociological Forum, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2003, pp. 215-244.
[13] E. J. Walsh and R. H. Warland, “Social Movement Involvement in the Wake of a Nuclear Accident: Activists and Free Fiders in the Tmi Area,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, No. 6, 1983, pp. 764-780. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095324
[14] A. Schussman and S. A. Soule, “Process and Protest: Accounting for Individual Protest Participation,” Social Forces, Vol. 84, No. 2, 2005, pp. 1083-1108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0034
[15] E. Brown and J. M. Ferris, “Social Capital and Philanthropy: An Analysis of the Impact of Social Capital on Individual Giving and Volunteering,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2007, pp. 85-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764006293178
[16] H. E. Brady, K. L. Schlozman and S. Verba, “Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 93, No. 1, 1999, pp. 153-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2585767
[17] K. S. Jones, “Giving and Volunteering as Distinct Forms of Civic Engagement: The Role of Community Integration and Personal Resources in Formal Helping,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2006, pp. 249-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764006287464
[18] M. A. Musick, J. Wilson, and W. B. Bynum, “Race and Formal Volunteering: The Differential Effects of Class and Religion,” Social Forces, Vol. 78, No. 4, 2000, pp. 1539-1570.
[19] L. Kulik, “Explaining Responses to Volunteering: An Ecological Model,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2007, pp. 239-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764006295994
[20] United Blood Services, “Blood Drive Success: A Guide for Workplace Blood Drive Coordinators,” 2007. http://www.unitedbloodservices.org/getInvolved.aspx
[21] L. C. Lee, J. A. Piliavin and V. R. A. Call, “Giving Time, Money, and Blood: Similarities and Differences,” Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 62, No. 3, 1999, pp. 276-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2695864
[22] J. R. Smith and A. McSweeney, “Charitable Giving: The Effectiveness of a Revised Theory of Planned Behaviour Model in Predicting Donating Intentions and Behaviour,” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 5, 2007, pp. 363-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/casp.906
[23] H. Taniguchi, “Men’s and Women’s Volunteering: Gender Differences in the Effects of Employment and Family Characteristics,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2006, pp. 83-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764005282481
[24] L. Andersson, R. Giacalone and C. Jurkiewicz, “On the Relationship of Hope and Gratitude to Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 70, No. 4, 2007, pp. 401-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9118-1
[25] F. F. Brunel and M. R. Nelson, “Explaining Gendered Responses to ‘Help-Self’ and ‘Help-Other’ Charity ad Appeals: The Mediating Role of World-Views,” Journal of Advertising, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2000, pp. 15-28.
[26] R. Karniol, E. Grosz and I. Schorr, “Caring, Gender Role Orientation, and Volunteering,” Sex Roles, Vol. 49, No. 1-2, 2003, pp. 11-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023953401662
[27] M. C. D. de Leon and J. F. Diaz-Morales, “Volunteerism and Elderly,” Anales De Psicologia, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2009, pp. 375-389.
[28] C. J. Einolf, “Will the Boomers Volunteer During Retirement? Comparing the Baby Boom, Silent, and Long Civic Cohorts,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2009, pp. 181-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764008315182
[29] S. K. Gallagher, “Doing Their Share: Comparing Patterns of Help Given by Older and Younger Adults,” Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 56, No. 3, 1994, pp. 567-578. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352868
[30] B. Suanet, M. B. van Groenou and A. W. Braam, “Changes in Volunteering among Young Old in the Netherlands between 1992 and 2002: The Impact of Religion, Age-Norms, and Intergenerational Transmission,” European Journal of Ageing, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2009, pp. 157-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10433-009-0119-7
[31] R. A. Sundeen, C. Garcia and S. A. Raskoff, “Ethnicity, Acculturation, and Volunteering to Organizations A Comparison of African Americans, Asians, Hispanics, and Whites,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2009, pp. 929-955. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764008322779
[32] J. Wilson, “Volunteering,” Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2000, pp. 215-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.215
[33] P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff, “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, No. 5, 2003, pp. 879-903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
[34] P. E. Spector, “Using Self-Report Questionnaires in OB Research: A Comment on the Use of a Controversial Method,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 15, No. 5, 1994, pp. 385-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150503
[35] E. Martin, “Power and Authority in the Classroom: Sexist Stereotypes in Teaching Evaluations,” Signs, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1984, pp. 482-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/494073
[36] A. R. Hochschild, “The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling,” 20th Anniversary Edition, University of California Press, Berkeley, 2003.
[37] Y. K. Lee and C. T. Chang, “Who Gives What to Charity? Characteristics Affecting Donation Behavior,” Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2007, pp. 1173-1180. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.9.1173

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.