The Path to Information Technology Business Value: Case of Turkey
Birgul Arslan, Meltem Ozturan
DOI: 10.4236/ti.2011.21007   PDF    HTML     4,973 Downloads   9,849 Views   Citations


This study seeks to shed light upon the strategic value of information technology (IT) investments. Previous literature suggests that IT investments per se are not sufficient for improving firm performance. Drawing from the resource-based view, it is hypothesized in this study that IT investments can deliver higher firm performance if they are 1) combined with complementary assets, 2) leveraged to build capabilities and 3) used to support organizational core competencies. Based on the data collected, the findings show that IT support for core competencies has a significant positive effect on firm performance and the research model explains more than fifty percent variation of this performance. The study contributes to the literature by developing a comprehensive resource-based model of IT value, which takes IT, human and complementary resources into account and combines them with IT-related capabilities. The study also attempts to fill the gap of measurement by proposing a new measurement for IT stock of company which accounts for both the availability and the level of information technologies held by the company. Lastly, the study provides evidence from an under researched country, Turkey.

Share and Cite:

B. Arslan and M. Ozturan, "The Path to Information Technology Business Value: Case of Turkey," Technology and Investment, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2011, pp. 52-63. doi: 10.4236/ti.2011.21007.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] E. Brynjolfsson, “The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 36, No. 12, December 1993, pp. 66-77. doi:10.1145/163298.163309
[2] R. M. Solow, “We’d Better Watch Out,” New York Times Book Review, New York Times, New York, July 1987, pp. 36.
[3] M. N. Baily, “What Has Happened to Productivity Growth?,” Science, Vol. 234, No. 4775, October 1986, pp. 443-451. doi:10.1126/science.234.4775.443
[4] D. W. Jorgenson and K. Stiroh, “Computers and Growth,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1995, pp. 295-316. doi:10.1080/10438599500000008
[5] S. S. Roach, “America’s Technology Dilemma: A Profile of the Information Economy,” Morgan Stanley, 1987.
[6] S. S. Roach, “Services Under Siege: The Restructuring Imperative,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69, No. 5, September-October 1991, pp. 82-91.
[7] C. J. Morrison and E. R. Berndt, “Assessing Productivity of Information Technology Equipment in U.S. Manufacturing Industries,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 79, No. 3, August 1997, pp. 471-481. doi:10.1162/003465300556887
[8] E. Brynjolfsson and S. Yang, “Information Technology and Productivity: A Review of the Literature,” Advances in Computers, Vol. 43, 1996, pp. 179-214. doi:10.1016/S0065-2458(08)60644-0
[9] E. Brynjolfsson and S. Yang, “The Intangible Benefits and Costs of Investments: Evidence from Financial Markets,” Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Systems, Atlanta, December 1997, pp. 147-166
[10] E. Brynjolfsson and L. M. Hitt, “Beyond the Productivity Paradox,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 41, No. 8, August 1998, pp. 49-55. doi:10.1145/280324.280332
[11] N. Melville, K. L. Kraemer and V. Gurbaxani, “Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 2, June 2004, pp. 283-322.
[12] M. A. Marchant and W. M. Snell, “Macroeconomic and International Policy Terms,” Internet Available:,1991.
[13] E. Brynjolfsson and L. M. Hitt, “Paradox Lost? Firm- Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending,” Management Science, Vol. 42, No. 4, April 1996, pp. 541-558. doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.4.541
[14] D. W. Jorgenson and K. J. Stiroh, “Information Technology and Growth,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 2, May 1999, pp. 109-115. doi:10.1257/aer.89.2.109
[15] L. M. Hitt and E. Brynjolfsson, “Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 2, June 1996, pp. 121-142. doi:10.2307/249475
[16] S. M. Shafer and T. A. Byrd, “A Framework for Measuring the Efficiency of Organizational Investments in Information Technology Using Envelopment Analysis,” Omega, Vol. 28, No. 2, April 2000, pp. 125-41. doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00039-0
[17] Cockburn and Z. Griliches, “Industry Effects and Appropriability Measures in the Stock Market’s Valuation of R&D and Patents,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 78, No. 2, May 1988, pp. 419-423.
[18] Z. Griliches, “Market Value, R&D and Patents,” Economic Letters, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1981, pp. 183-187. doi:10.1016/0165-1765(87)90114-5
[19] B. H. Hall, “The Stock Market’s Valuation of R&D Investment during the 1980’s,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 2, May 1993, pp. 259-264.
[20] B. Kogut and N. Kulatilaka, “Operating flexibility, Global Manufacturing and the Option Value of a Multinational Network,” Management Science, Vol. 40, No. 1, January 1994, pp. 123-139. doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.1.123
[21] C. Y. Baldwin, and K. B. Clark, “Capital-Budgeting Systems and Capabilities Investments in U.S. Companies after the Second World War,” Business History Review, Vol. 68, No. 1, Spring 1994, pp. 73-109. doi:10.2307/3117016
[22] J. Barney, “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, March 1991, pp. 99-120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108
[23] R. P. Rumelt, “Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm,” In: R. Lamb, Ed., Competitive Strategic Management, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1984, pp. 556-570.
[24] B. Wernerfelt, “A Resource-Based View of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, April-June 1984, pp. 171-180. doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207
[25] A. S. Bharadwaj, “A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 1, March 2000, pp. 169-196. doi:10.2307/3250983
[26] S. Devaraj and R. Kohli, “Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link?” Management Science, Vol. 49, No. 3, March 2001, pp. 273-289. doi:10.1287/mnsc.
[27] K. Zhu, “The Complementarity of Information Technology Infrastructure and E-Commerce Capability: A Resource-Based Assessment of Their Business Value,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 21, No. 1, Summer 2004, pp. 167-202.
[28] G. Ray, W. A. Muhanna and J. Barney, “Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A Resource-Based Analysis,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 4, December 2005, pp. 625-652.
[29] F. Wu, S. Yeniyurt, D. Kim and T. Cavusgil, “The Impact of Information Technology on Supply Chain Capabilities and Firm Performance: A Resource-Based view,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 35, No. 4, May 2006, pp. 493-504. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.05.003
[30] S. M. Huang, C. S. Ou, C. M. Chen and B. Lin, “An Empirical Study of Relationship between IT Investment and Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Perspective,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 173, No. 3, September 2006, pp. 984-999. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.013
[31] R. Sabherwal and Y. E. Chan, “Alignment between Business and IS Strategies: A study of Prospectors, Analyzers and Defenders,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, March 2001, pp. 11-33. doi:10.1287/isre.
[32] B. Dehning, V. J. Richardson and R. Zmud, “The Value Relevance of Announcements of Transformational Information Technology Investments,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 4, December 2003, pp. 637-656.
[33] W. Oh and A. Pinsonneault, “On the Assessment of the Strategic Value of Information Technologies: Conceptual and Analytical Approaches,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 2, June 2007, pp. 239-265.
[34] T. Ravichandran and C. Lertwongsatien, “Effect of Information Systems Resources and Capabilities on Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Perspective,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 237-276.
[35] F. J. Mata, W. L. Fuerst and J. B. Barney, “Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Analysis”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 4, December 1995, pp. 487-505. doi:10.2307/249630
[36] T. C. Powell and A. D. Micallef, “Information Technology as Competitive Advantage: The Role of Human, Business and Technology Resources,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 5, May 1997, pp. 375-405. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<375::AID-SMJ876>3.0.CO;2-7
[37] Barua, K. Prabhudev, A. B. Whinston and F. Yin, “An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 4, December 2004, pp. 585- 620.
[38] J. Barney, M. Wright and D. J. Jr. Ketchen, “The Resource-Based View of the Firm: Ten Years after 1991,” Journal of Management, Vol. 27, No. 1, December 2001, pp. 625-641. doi:10.1177/014920630102700601
[39] R. M. Grant, “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation,” California Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 3, Spring 1991, pp. 114-135.
[40] T. A. Byrd and E. D. Turner, “Measuring the Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 17, No. 1, summer 2000, pp. 167-208.
[41] G. Hamel, “The Concept of Core Competence,” In: G. Hamel and A. Heene, Eds., Competence-Based Competition, Wiley, New York, 1994, pp: 11-33.
[42] K. C. Laudon and J. P. Laudon, “Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm,” Prentice Hall, 2006.
[43] J. A. Hoffer, J. F. George and J. S. Valacich, “Modern System Analysis & Design,” Prentice Hall, 2001.
[44] V. Grover, K. Fiedler and J. Teng, “Empirical Evidence on Swanson’s Tri-Core Model of Information Systems Innovation,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, September 1997, pp. 273-87. doi:10.1287/isre.8.3.273
[45] M. Hannan and J. Freemani, “Structural Inertia and Organizational Change,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, April 1984, pp. 149-164. doi:10.2307/2095567
[46] T. A. Byrd, E. H. Thrasher, T. Lang and N. W. Davidson, “A Process-Oriented Perspective of IS Success: Examining the Impact of IS on Operational Cost,” Omega, Vol. 34, No. 5, October 2006, pp. 448-460. doi:10.1016/
[47] J. Hulland, “Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Four Recent Studies,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 2, February 1999, pp. 195-204. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7
[48] S. Petter, D. Straub and A. Rai, “Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 4, December 2007, pp. 623-656.
[49] M. Tenenhaus, V. E. Vinzi, Y. Chatelin and C. Lauro, “PLS Path Modeling,” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 48, No. 1, January 2005, pp. 159-205. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
[50] C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, February 1982, pp. 39-50. doi:10.2307/3151312
[51] J. C. Nunnally, “Psychometric Theory,” McGraw- Hill, 1978.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.