Determination of Eight Sudan Dyes in Chili Powder by UPLC-MS/MS


Sudan dyes are synthetic azo dyes which are widely used in industry. Although they are not allowed in foodstuffs, they have been found contaminating in different food products and their presence is regularly reported. It is assumed that these appearances are due to cross-contamination or adulteration. In this paper, we present a newly developed fast and sensitive method for the quantification of eight Sudan dyes, using liquid-liquid extraction and UPLC-MS/MS analysis. The calibration curves were linear over the range of 0.1-25 mg/kg. Mean recovery for the eight Sudan dyes ranged from 80.7% to 104.4%, and with the inter-day and intra-day precisions ranged from 2.24% to 12.2%. The method was successfully applied in the determination of Sudan dyes in chili powder of 10 samples.

Share and Cite:

Wang, L. , Zheng, J. , Zhang, Z. , Wang, T. and Che, B. (2013) Determination of Eight Sudan Dyes in Chili Powder by UPLC-MS/MS. Engineering, 5, 154-157. doi: 10.4236/eng.2013.510B033.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] T. M. Fonovich, “Sudan Dyes: Are They Dangerous for Human Health?” Drug and Chemical Toxicology, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2013, pp. 343-352.
[2] F. Calbiani, M. Careri, L. Elviri and A. Mangia, “Development and In-House Validation of a Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Sudan Ⅰ, Sudan Ⅱ, Sudan Ⅲ, and Sudan Ⅳ in Hot Chili Products,” Journal of Chromatography A, Vol. 1042, 2004, pp. 123-130.
[3] European Food Safety Authority, Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, “Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food on a Request from the Commission to Review the Toxicology of a Number of Dyes Illegally Present in Food in the EU,” EFSA Journal, Vol. 263, 2005, pp. 1-71.
[4] M. Stiborova, V. Martinek, H. Rydlova, et al., “Sudan I Is a Potential Carcinogen for Humans: Evidence for Its Metabolic Activation and Detoxication,” Cancer Research, Vol. 62, No. 20, 2002, pp. 5678-5684.
[5] K. Golka, S. Kopps, H. M. Prager, et al., “Bladder Cancer in Crack Testers Applying Azo Dye-Based Sprays to Metal Bodies,” Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, Vol. 75, 2012, pp. 566-571.
[6] S. S. Aliscioni, J. P. Torretta, M. Ebello and B. G. Galato, “Elaiophores in Gomesa bifolia (sims) M. W. Chase & N. H. Williams: Structure and Oil Secretion,” Annals of Botany, Vol. 104, 2009, pp. 1141-1149.
[7] W. J. Crinnion, “Toxic Effects of Easily Avoidable Phthalates and Parabens,” Alternative Medicine Review, Vol. 15, 2010, pp. 190-196.
[8] IARC Monographs, “Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs Volumes 1-102,” 2011.
[9] R. Noguerol-Cal and L. B. Losada, “High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Analysis of Ten Dyes for Control and Safety of Commercial Articles,” Journal of Chromatography A, Vol. 1179, 2008, pp. 152-160.
[10] X. L. Hou, Y. G. Li, S. J. Cao, Z. W. Zhang and Y. N. Wu, “Analysis of Para Red and Sudan Dyes in Egg Yolk by UPLC-MS-MS,” Chromatographia, Vol. 71, 2010, pp. 135-138.
[11] O. Pardo and A. Pastor, “Development of a Method for the Analysis of Seven Banned Azo-Dyes in Chili and Hot Chili Food Samples by Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Liquid Chromatography with Electrospray Ionization-Tandem Mass Spectrumetry,” Talanta, Vol. 78, 2009, pp. 178-186.
[12] R. Rebane, I. Leito, S. Yurchenko and K. Herodes, “A Review of Analytical Techniques for Determination of Sudan I-IV Dyes in Food Matrixes,” Journal of Chromatography A, Vol. 1217, 2010, pp. 2747-2757.
[13] C. Li, L. Y. Wu and J. Z. Shen, “UPLC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis of Sudan Dyes and Para Red in Food,” Food Additives & Contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure & Risk Assessment, Vol. 27, 2010, pp. 1215-1220.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.