The Relative Biologic Effectiveness versus Linear Energy Transfer Curve as a Cell Trait

Quoc T. Luu, Paul DuChateau

Department of Mathematics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/am.2013.411A3004                

Abstract

The magnitude of biological response varies with different radiation types. Using Linear Energy Transfer (LET) to differentiate types of incident radiation beam, the Relative Biologic Effectiveness (RBE) as a function of LET (RBE-LET) was found to have a characteristic shape with a peak around LET values 100 - 200 eV/nm. This general feature is believed to be a property of the incident beam. Our systems engineering model, however, suggests that the shape of the RBE-LET curve is a cell trait, a property of the cell. Like any other trait, phenotypic variations result from interactions of the genes and their context. State-space block diagram of the differential equation model suggests the genes are those in the DNA double strand break (dsb) repair pathway; and the context is cellular stress responsing to DNA damage by both external stimuli and internal redox state. At a deeper level, the block diagram suggests cell using mathematical calculations in its decision-making when facing a stress signal. The MRN protein complex, in particular, may perform addition to count the degree of DNA twisting for the homeostatic regulation of DNA supercoiling. The ATM protein may act as a feedback amplifier.

Keywords

RBE-LET Curve; Cell Trait; Systems Biology; Fourier Analysis; Stochastic Differential Equation

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	E. L. Alpen, “Radiation Biophysics,” Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, 1990.
[2]	K. M. Prise, G. Ahnstrom, M. Belli, J. Carlsson, D. Frankenberg, J. Kiefer, M. Lobrich, B. D. Michael, J. Nygren, G. Simone and B. Stenerlow, “A Review of dsb Induction Data for Varying Quality Radiations,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, Vol. 74, 1998, pp. 173-184.
[3]	B. Everitt, S. Landau and M. Leese, “Cluster Analysis,” 4th Edition, Arnold Publishers, London, 2001.
[4]	Q. T. Luu and P. DuChateau, “The Relative Biologic Effectiveness versus Linear Energy Transfer Curve as an Output-Input Relation for Linear Cellular System,” Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, Vol. 6, 2009, pp. 591-602.
[5]	Q. T. Luu, P. DuChateau and M. Dingfelder, “Fourier Analysis of Energy Transfer Data Obtained by Simulating 14MeV α-Particle in Water,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B, Vol. 268, 2010, pp. 219-222.
[6]	R. Cox, “A Cellular Description of the Repair Defect in Ataxia-Telangiectasia,” In: D. G. Harnden, Ed., Ataxia Telangiectasia: A Cellular and Molecular Link between Cancer, Neuropathology, and Immune Deficiency, John Wiley and Sons, 1982, pp. 141-153.
[7]	C. Lucke-Huhle, “Similarities between Human Ataxia Fibroblasts and Murine SCID Cells: High Sensitivity to Rays and High Frequency of Methotrexate-Induced ZDHFR Gene Amplification, but Normal Radiosensitivity to Densely Ionizing α-Particles,” Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, Vol. 33, 1994, pp. 201-210.
[8]	H. Nagasawa, J. B. Little, W. C. Inkret, M. Carpenter, R. Raju, D. Chen and G. F. Strniste, “Response of X-Ray Sensitive CHO Mutant Cells (xrs-6c) to Radiation,” Radiation Research, Vol. 126, 1991, pp. 280-288.
[9]	R. Okayasu, M. Okada, A. Okabe, M. Noguchi, K. Takakura and S. Takahashi, “Repair of DNA Damage Induced by Accelerated Heavy Ions in Mammalian Cells Proficient and Deficient in the Non-Homologous End-Joining Pathway,” Radiation Research, Vol. 165, 2006, pp. 5967.
[10]	C. A. Tobias, E. A. Blakely, P. Y. Chang, L. Lommel and R. Root, “Response of Sensitive Human Ataxia and Resistant T-1 Cell Lines to Accelerated Heavy Ions,” British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 49, 1984, pp. 175-185.
[11]	W. K. Weyrather, R. Ritter, M. Scholz and G. Kraft, “RBE for Carbon Track Segment Irradiation in Cell Lines of Differing Repair Capacity,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, Vol. 75, 1999, pp. 1357-1364.
[12]	G. W. Barendsen, “The Relationships between RBE and LET for Different Types of Lethal Damage in Mammalian Cells: Biophysical and Molecular Mechanism,” Radiation Research, Vol. 139, 1994, pp. 257-270.
[13]	E. A. Blakely, C. A. Tobias, T. C. H. Yang, K. C. Smith and J. T. Lyman, “Inactivation of Human Kidney Cells by High-Energy Monoenergetic Heavy-Ion Beams,” Radiation Research Vol. 80, 1979, pp. 122-160.
[14]	R. A. Britten, H. M. Warenius, R. White, P. J. Browning and J. A. Green, “Melphalan Resistant Human Ovarian Tumor Cells Are Cross-Resistant to Photons, but Not to High LET Neutrons,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vol. 18, 1990, pp. 357-363.
[15]	J. D. Chapman, S. Doern, A. P. Reuvers, C. J. Gillespie, A. Chatterjee, E. A. Blakely, K. C. Smith and C. A. Tobias, “Radioprotection by DMSO of Mammalian Cells Exposed to X-Ray and to Heavy Charged-Particle Beams,” Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, Vol. 16, 1979, pp. 29-41.
[16]	P. Todd, “Heavy-Ion Irradiation of Cultured Human Cells,” Radiation Research, Vol. S7, 1967, pp. 196-207.
[17]	G. Kraft, “Radiobiological Effects of Very Heavy Ions: Inactivation, Induction of Chromosome Aberrations and Strand Breaks,” Nuclear Sciences and Applications, Vol. 3, 1987, pp. 1-28.
[18]	E. Kinoshita, E. van der Linden, H. Sanchez and C. Wyman, “Rad50, an SMC Family Member with Multiple Roles in DNA Break Repair: How Does ATP Affect Function?” Chromosome Research, Vol. 17, 2009, pp. 277-288.
[19]	K. Kimura and T. Hirano, “ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation,” Cell, Vol. 90, 1997, pp. 625-634.
[20]	Y. Wu, S. Xiao and X. D. Zhu, “Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 and ATM Function as Co-Mediators of TRF1 in Telomere Length Control,” Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, Vol. 14, 2007, pp. 832-840.
[21]	S. Marcand, E. Gilson and D. Shore, “A Protein-Counting Mechanism for Telomere Length Regulation in Yeast,” Science, Vol. 275, 1997, pp. 986-990.
[22]	K. Mouri, J. C. Nacher and T. Akutsu, “A Mathematical Model for the Detection Mechanism of DNA Double Strand Breaks Depending on Autophosphorylation of ATM,” PloS One, Vol. 4, 2009, Article ID: e5131.
[23]	S. Shreeram, O. N. Demidov, W. K. Hee, H. Yamaguchi, N. Onishi, C. Kek, O. N. Timofeev, C. Dudgeon, A. J. Fornace, C. W. Anderson, Y. Minami, E. Appella and D. V. Bulavin, “Wip1 Phosphatase Modules ATM-Dependent Signaling Pathways,” Molecular Cell, Vol. 23, 2006, pp. 757-764.