Characterization of Multicultural Values: Affective Impact of Writing Extensive Journals in a University-Level Course


The highest educational objective of affective domain is characterization, which refers to the level of character development where individuals’ behaviors and values remain consistent. Because the educational objectives of affect are categorically different from cognitive educational objectives, an alternative pedagogical conceptualization that integrates teaching, learning, and evaluating aspects of character development is essential in multicultural education. The current action research presents: 1) a rubric of multicultural education journal writing that evaluates the quality of students’ journals; 2) coherent journal topics and accessible resources for journal entries; and 3) exemplary student journals that sufficiently meet the criteria of rubric, topic, and resource requirements. The presented rubric, topics, resources, and actual student journal examples may serve as a model that both multicultural education teachers and students alike can utilize in their teaching and learning practices.

Share and Cite:

Jeong, T. (2013). Characterization of Multicultural Values: Affective Impact of Writing Extensive Journals in a University-Level Course. Creative Education, 4, 171-177. doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.47A2022.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Banks, J. A. (2009). Teaching strategies for ethnic studies (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
[2] Banks, J. A. (2014). An introduction to multicultural education (Vol. 5th). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
[3] Banks, J. A., & Banks, C. A. (1995). Handbook of research on multi cultural education. New York: Macmillan.
[4] Batson, C. D. (2008). Moral masquerades: Experimental exploration of the nature of moral motivation. Phenomenology & Cognitive Science, 7, 51-66. doi:10.1007/s11097-007-9058-y
[5] Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvanani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751-758. doi:10.1177/0146167297237008
[6] Bennett, C. I. (2011). Comprehensive multicultural education: Theory and practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
[7] Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
[8] Check, J., & Schutt, R. K. (2012). Research methods in education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[9] Cook, I. (2000). “Nothing can ever be the case of ‘us’ and ‘them’ again”: Exploring the politics of difference through border pedagogy and student journal writing. Journal of Geography in Higher Educa tion, 24, 13-27. doi:10.1080/03098260085108
[10] Cook, P. J., & Ludwig, J. (2008). The burden of “acting white”: Do black adolescents disapage academic achievement? In J. U. Ogbu (Ed.), Minority status, oppositional culture, & schooling (pp. 275 297). New York: Routledge.
[11] Dompnier, B., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2009). Faking the desire to learn: A clarification of the link between mastery goals and academic achievement. Psychological Science, 20, 939-943. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02384.x
[12] Elik, N., Wiener, J., & Corkum, P. (2010). Pre-service teachers’ open minded thinking dispositions, readiness to learn, and attitudes about learning and behavioural difficulties in students. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 127-146. doi:10.1080/02619760903524658
[13] Ford, D. Y. (2011). Multicultural gifted education (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc.
[14] Fraenken, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGrow-Hill.
[15] Giroux, P. (1991). Democracy & the discourse of cultural difference: Toward a politics of border pedagogy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 12, 501-519. doi:10.1080/0142569910120406
[16] Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive sci ence for ethics. Chicago: University of Chigago Press.
[17] Kerger, S., Martin, R., & Brunner, M. (2011). How can we enhance girls’ interest in scientific topics? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 606-628. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02019.x
[18] Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II. Affective domain. White Plains: Longman Inc.
[19] McMillan, J. H. (2007). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective instruction (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
[20] Nolen, A., & Vander Putten, J. (2007). Action research in education: Gaps in ethical principles and practices. Educational Researcher, 36, 401-407. doi:10.3102/0013189X07309629
[21] Popham, W. J. (2011). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
[22] Poulou, M. S. (2009). Classroom interactions: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions. Research in Education, 82, 103-106. doi:10.7227/RIE.82.9
[23] Reeve, J. (2005). Understanding motivation and emotion (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
[24] Sarwar, M., Yousuf, M. I., & Ranjha, A. N. (2011). Usefulness and le vel of interest in Pakistan national curriculum subjects: Secondary school students’ perceptions. International Journal of Academic Re search, 3, 964-969.
[25] Shadreck, M., & Isaac, M. (2012). Science teacher quality and effec tiveness: Gweru Urban Junior Secondary School students’ points of view. Asian Social Science, 8, 160-165. doi:10.5539/ass.v8n8p160
[26] Shirbagi, N. (2010). An exploration of undergraduate students’ motive tion and attitudes towards English language acquisition. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 20, 1-14.
[27] Sleeter, C. E. (1995). An analysis of the critiques of multicultural edu cation. In J. A. Banks, & C. A. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 81-94). New York: Macmillan.
[28] Stotland, E. (n.d.). Exploratory investigations of emphathy. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 271-313). New York: Academic Press.
[29] Williams, R. B., & Dunn, S. E. (2008). Brain compatible learning for the block (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.