Legal Support of Planning in the PRC

Olga Kucher

Institute of Economics and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Donetsk, Ukraine.

DOI: 10.4236/blr.2013.42007                

Abstract

Looking at the People’s Republic of China (PRC) reforms it is necessary to mention that they were not resulted from foreign experts or from other countries experience they were a result of a long term Chinese strategy. This strategy includes such aspects as economy system, social benefits national safety provided that PRC is open to international influence. This long term strategy has its main tools of planning system. With the help of such system government can control all market processes which, for sure, lead to the growth and success in economy. Alongside of such model, Chinese government before and nowadays use methods of direct and indirect regulations as well as administrative influence. It means that such government interference in market process will make state structures powerful and experienced players in this game. It is necessary to say that in the period of globalized world economy multinational corporations started influencing all processes more and more, and we need to review role of government regulation. In this work next step will be directed at legal support and identification of effective government functions which can influence and control private sector. These government functions regulation can help to create balance between state, private assets and international organization in order to have a good basis for competitive world economic position. The article has a purpose to analyze key features of Chinese planning system, distinguish peculiarities and apply to other systems. In the article following methods are used chronological development of the system starting from the beginning; dialectical method of making conclusion basing on facts; and elements of comparative analysis. Result of this article is opportunity to apply such characteristics to other countries.

Keywords

Planning System Genesis; Asian Planning System; Legal Mechanism; Legal Support

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Atamanchuk, G. (2000). Governance (organizational-functional issues). Moscow.
[2]	Kuzyk, B. (2008). Forecasting, strategic planning and national programming. Moscow: Economika.
[3]	Lortikyan, E. (1995). The historical experience and our reforms. Business—Inform, 45-46, 4-9.
[4]	Mamutov, V. (1982). Improving the legal regulation of economic activity. Kyiv: The Naukova Dumka.
[5]	Mikheev, V. (2000). Evolution of socio-economic model of China. Society and Economy, 3-4, 148-189.
[6]	Pakhomov, Y., & Pavlenko, Y. (2008). Civilization of the east in the conditions of globalization (pp. 74-555). Kyiv: The Naukova Dumka.
[7]	Pawlowski, M. (1997). Chinese еxperience-lessons for Ukraine. Golos of Ukraine, February 25, 8-9.
[8]	Popova, E. (2008). Indicative planning is the main method of long-term socio-economic strategy of Russia. Innovations, 9, 15-27.
[9]	Selishchev, A., & Selishchev, N. (2004). Chinese economy in the XXI century. St. Petersburg: The Peter.
[10]	Shen, L. C., & Kazarinova, O. (2002). Economic reforms in China. Moscow: The Delo.
[11]	Shvetsov, A. (2009). Systematics of strategic planning tools of territorial development: An urgent needs and concrete suggestions. Russian Economic Journal, 5, 12-17.
[12]	Sukharev, O. (2001). Institutional reforms in the twentieth century. An evolutionary perspective on economic policy. Investment in Russia, 5, 22-31.
[13]	The Law of the People’s Republic (2011). On stimulation of small and medium enterprises. UGL Corporation (China). PRC laws, legisla tion and law in China. http://law.uglc.ru/stimulation.htm
[14]	Tszichun, S. (2007). On the mechanisms of planning management acording to law. Economic Law, 7, 51.
[15]	Tymoshchuk, M. (2005). Indicative planning: International experience and prospects of its application in Ukraine. Regional Economics, 3, 230-236.
[16]	Yuntsyu, I., & Shuang, F. (2010). Economic planning in China in terms of law. The doctrine of the right of control, 3, 12-20.