Characteristics of Gas Exchange in Three Domesticated Anemone Species
Feihu Liu, Fei Li, Xueni Liang
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2010.11007   PDF    HTML     4,530 Downloads   8,860 Views  


Seeds of three Anemone species were collected from the suburban areas of Kunming and planted in a nursery for three and a half years at Kunming, Yunnan Province, China. Leaf gas exchange measurement indicated that these species had similar one-peak diurnal trends of net photosynthetic rate (PN), although A. rivularis had lower transpiration rate (TR), stomatal conductance (gs) and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), and higher stomatal limit in the afternoon. Species differences in response of PN to photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) were observed, especially under strong light. A. rivularis had the highest PN and Ci under strong light which corresponded with its highest gs and TR. A. rivularis had the highest light saturation point (LSP) (1000 mol m-2 s-1) and light compensation point (LCP) (69 mol m-2 s-1), while A. hupehensis var. japonica had the lowest LSP (800 ?mol m-2 s-1) and a lower LCP (53 mol m-2 s-1). But the three species responded similarly to the change of CO2 concentration in the air from 0 to 350 ?mol (CO2) mol-1, and their observed CO2 compensation point showed little difference (47, 53 and 56 ?mol (CO2) mol-1). Moreover, A. rivularis had the highest apparent quantum yield (0.032), carboxylation efficiency (0.049), PN (11.68 ?mol (CO2) m-2 s-1) and TR (5.36 mmol (H2O) m-2 s-1) based on the PN -PAR response. The results implied that A. rivularis is able to grow well under higher radiation, while A. hupehensis var. japonica is the best one to grow under partial shade.

Share and Cite:

F. Liu, F. Li and X. Liang, "Characteristics of Gas Exchange in Three Domesticated Anemone Species," American Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2010, pp. 47-54. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2010.11007.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Y. L. Yuan, J. L. Zhao and W. P. XU, “Anemone of Morphology Characteristic and Introduction Apply Study,” Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, Vol. 17, No. 5, 1997, pp. 134-136.
[2] Botanical Institute of Kunming CAoS, “Flora Yunna- nica,” Science Press, Beijing, Vol. 11, 2000, pp. 183-204.
[3] M. Y. Fang and M. Y. Yang, “A Study on Pollen Morph- ology and Evolution of the Genus Anemone from Sichu- an,” Journal of Sichuan University, Vol. 31, No. 2, 1994, pp. 246-258.
[4] Q. E. Yang, “Cytology of Ten Species in Anemone, One in Anemoclema and Six in Clematis (Trib. Anemoneae, Ranunculaceae) form China,” Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2002, pp. 396-405.
[5] S. B. Hoot, “Phylogenetic Relationships in Anemone (Ranuculaceae) Based on Morphology and Chloroplast DNA,” Systematic Botany, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1994, pp. 169-200.
[6] Y. Jacob, “Breeding of Anemone Coronaria Tetraploid Hybrids,” Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Flower Bulbs, Vol. II, Herzliya, Israel. Acta Horticulturae, Vol. 430, 1997, pp. 503-508.
[7] T. Lindell, “Breeding Systems and Crossing Experiments in Anemone Patens and in the Anemone Pulsatilla Group (Ranunculaceae),” Nordic Journal of Botany, Vol. 18, No. 5, 1998, pp. 549-561.
[8] J. J. Vacher, “Responses of Two Main Andean Crops, Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) and Papa Amarga (Solanum juzepczukii Buk.) to Drought on the Bolivian Altiplano: Significance of Local Adaptation,” Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 68, No. 1-2, 1998, pp. 99-108.
[9] G. D. Farquhar and T. D. Sharkey, “Stomatal Conductance and Photosynthesis,” Annual Review of Plant Phys- iology, Vol. 33, 1982, pp. 317-345.
[10] J. Ehleringer and O. Bj?rkman, “Quantum Yields for CO2 Uptake in C3 and C4 Plants,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 59, No. 1, 1977, pp. 86-90.
[11] J. Ehleringer and R. W. Pearcy, “Variation in Quantum Yield for CO2 Uptake among C3 and C4 Plants,” Plant Physiology, Vol. 73, No. 3, 1983, pp. 555-559.
[12] Z. Y. Tao and Q. Zou, “Effect of Strong Irradiance and Shortly Elevated CO2 Concentrations on Photosynthetic Efficiencies in Maize and Soybean Leaves,” Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2005, pp. 244-249.
[13] Z. J. Wang, T. C. Guo, Y. J. Zhu, Y. H. Wang, J. H. Wang and M. Zhao, “Comparison of CO2 Assimilation Capacity in Flag Leaf for Super High Yield Wheat with Different Spike Type,” Acta Agronomica Sinica, Vol. 30, No. 8, 2004, pp. 739-744.
[14] S. Pandey, S. Kumar and P. K. Nagar, “Photosynthetic Performance of Ginkgo Biloba L. Grown under High and Low Irradiance,” Photosynthetica, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2003, pp. 505- 511.
[15] R. V. Ribeiro, G. B. Lyra, A. V. Santiago, A. R. Pereira, E. C. Machado and R. F. Oliveira, “Diurnal and Seasonal Patterns of Leaf Gas Exchange in Bahiagrass (Paspalum Notatum Flugge) Growing in A Subtropical Climate,” Grass and Forage Science, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2006, pp. 293 -303.
[16] A. C. Tay, A. M. Abdullah, M. Awang and A. Furukawa, “Midday Depression of Photosynthesis in Enkleia Malaccensis, a Woody Climber in a Tropical Rainforest,” Photosynthetica, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2007, pp. 189-193.
[17] D. H. Ma, J. A. Pang, Z. R. He and S. J. Li, “Effect of Environmental Factors on the Photosynthetic Characteristics of Cucumber Seedlings,” Acta Botanica Boreali-Occ- identalia Sinica, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1997, pp. 97-100.
[18] D. Q. Xu, “Some Problems in Stomatal Limitation Analysis of Photosynthesis,” Plant Physiology Communications, Vol. 33, No. 4, 1997, pp. 241-244.
[19] P. P. Li, Y. G. Hu, Y. G. Zhao, X. J. Ying and H. P. Mao, “Comprehensive Model on the Effect of CO2 Enrichment on Lettuce Photosynthesis in Greenhouse,” Transaction of the CSAE, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2001, pp. 75-79.
[20] L. Jiang, S. Q. Cao, X. Dai and X. M. Xu, “Effect of Different Light Intensity on Photosynthesis of Tobacco,” Journal of Chinese Tobacco, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2000, pp. 17-20.
[21] L. Guidi, M. Tonini and G. F. Soldatini, “Effects of High Light and Ozone Fumigation on Photosynthesis in Phaseolus Vulgaris,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Vol. 38, No. 9, 2000, pp. 717-725.
[22] Q. Q. Guo, “Study on the Photosynthetic Characteristics of Ramie Leaves in Different Varieties and Their Relationship with Yield Formation of Ramie. II. The Physiol- Ecological Characteristics of Leaf in Photosynthesis,” Journal of Hunan Agricultural College, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1993, pp. 76-79.
[23] C. Stanghellini and J. A. Bunce, “Response of Photosynthesis and Conductance to Light, CO2, Temperature and Humidity in Tomato Plants Acclimated to Ambient and Elevated CO2,” Photosynthetica, Vol. 29, 1993, pp. 487 -497.
[24] H. Z. Dong, W. J. Li, W. Tang and Z. H. Li, “Photosynthetic Characteristics of Field Grown Cotton Leaves,” Sh- angdong Agricultural Science, No. 6, 2000, pp. 7-10.
[25] F. H. Liu, S. M. Hou and X. N. Liang, “Gas Exchange Characteristics of Four Domesticated Primula Species,” New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, Vol. 34, 2006, pp. 403-411.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.