Teachers’ Transformation to Inquiry-Based Instructional Practice


This collective case study examines secondary science teachers’ responses to a professional development program designed to assist in the transformation of inquiry belief structures and inquiry instructional practices. These teachers were participants in a year-long professional development institute that focused on increasing the quantity and quality of inquiry in secondary science classrooms. This multi-case design examines multiple data sources in order to answer the following research question: How do the beliefs and practices of teachers regarding inquiry-based instruction evolve over the year of intervention? Participants were selected using the data from an inquiry observational protocol to represent a variety of abilities and beliefs regarding inquiry instructional practice. The results provide insights into teachers’ belief structures and classroom structure related to inquiry instruction. Further, we detail the role of the professional development experience in facilitating transformation of classroom practice. Implications for how professional development programs are developed and led are provided.

Share and Cite:

Marshall, J. and Smart, J. (2013) Teachers’ Transformation to Inquiry-Based Instructional Practice. Creative Education, 4, 132-142. doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.42019.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Abd-El-Khalick, F., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 673-699. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199709)34:7<673::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-J
[2] Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[3] Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 1-12. doi:10.1023/A:1015171124982
[4] Atkin, J., & Karplus, R. (1962). Discovery of invention? Science Teacher, 29, 45.
[5] Baird, J. R., & Northfield, J. R. (1992). Learning from the PEEL experience. Melbourne: Monash University Printing.
[6] Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond, & G. Skyes (Eds.), Teaching as a learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[7] Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85, 536-553. doi:10.1002/sce.1022
[8] Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7-74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102
[9] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded ed.). Washington DC: National Academies Press.
[10] Briscoe, C. (1991). The dynamic interactions of beliefs, role metaphors, and teaching practices: A case study of teacher change. Science Education, 75, 185-199. doi:10.1002/sce.3730750204
[11] Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications (p. 49). Colorado: Colorado Springs.
[12] Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. J. (2006). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools: Developing fundamental knowledge and skills for teaching (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Perrill Prentice Hall.
[13] Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 815-843. doi:10.1002/tea.20171
[14] Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
[15] Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
[16] Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (2005). How students learn—Science in the classroom. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
[17] Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
[18] Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (1998). Learning in science: From behaviorism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_1
[19] Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
[20] Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding the 5E model: A proposed 7E model emphasizes “transfer of learning” and the importance of eliciting prior understanding. [Teacher Practitioner]. The Science Teacher, 70, 56-59.
[21] Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915
[22] Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 748-749.
[23] Horizon Research (2002). Inside the classroom interview protocol. URL (last checked 2 January 2013). http://www.horizon-research.com/insidetheclassroom/instruments/obs.php
[24] Johnston, K. (1991). High school science teachers; conceptualisations of teaching and learning: Theory and practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 14, 65-78. doi:10.1080/0261976910140108
[25] Karplus, R. (1977). Science teaching and the development of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, 169-175. doi:10.1002/tea.3660140212
[26] Kelly, G. J. (2007). Discourse in science classrooms. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[27] Llewellyn, D. (2005). Teaching high school science through inquiry: A case study approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: NSTA Press & Corwin Press.
[28] Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
[29] Luft, J., Bell, R. L., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2008). Science as inquiry in the secondary setting. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2008.00238.x
[30] Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czerniak, C. M. (2000). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 275-292. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200003)37:3<275::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2
[31] Marshall, J. C., Horton, B., Igo, B. L., & Switzer, D. M. (2009). K-12 science and mathematics teachers’ beliefs about and use of inquiry in the classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 575-596. doi:10.1007/s10763-007-9122-7
[32] Marshall, J. C., Horton, B., & Smart, J. (2009). 4E × 2 instructional model: Uniting three learning constructs to improve praxis in science and mathematics classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 501-516. doi:10.1007/s10972-008-9114-7
[33] Marshall, J. C., Horton, B., Smart, J., & Llewellyn, D. (2008). EQUIP: Electronic quality of inquiry protocol. URL (last checked 2 January 2013). http://www.clemson.edu/iim
[34] Marshall, J. C., Smart, J., & Horton, R. M. (2010). The design and validation of EQUIP: An instrument to assess inquiry-based instruction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 299-321. doi:10.1007/s10763-009-9174-y
[35] Marshall, J. C., Smart, J., Lotter, C., & Sirbu, C. (2011). Comparative analysis of two inquiry observational protocols: Striving to better understand the quality of teacher facilitated inquiry-based instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 111, 306-315. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00091.x
[36] Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom assessment and grading that work. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
[37] Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
[38] McDonald, S., Criswell, B., & Dreon, O. (2008). Inquiry in the chemistry classroom: Perplexity, model, testing, and synthesis. In J. Luft, R. L. Bell, & J. Gess-Newsome (Eds.), Science as inquiry in the secondary setting. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
[39] Mellado, V. (1998). The classroom practice of preservice teachers and their conceptions of teaching and learning science. Science Education, 82, 197-214. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199804)82:2<197::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-9
[40] Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case learning applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[41] Moje, E. B. (1995). Talking about science: An interpretation of the effects of teacher talk in a high school classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 349-371. doi:10.1002/tea.3660320405
[42] Morge, L. (2005). Teacher-pupil interaction: A study of hidden beliefs in conclusion phases. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 935-956. doi:10.1080/09500690500068600
[43] Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
[44] Moscovici, H., & Holdlund-Nelson, T. (1998). Shifting from activitymania to inquiry. Science and Children, 35, 14-17.
[45] National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (2006). Making a difference in quality teaching and student achievement. URL (last checked 23 October 2006). http://www.nbpts.org/resources/research
[46] National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
[47] National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
[48] Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578. doi:10.3102/00346543066004543
[49] Sawada, D., Piburn, M., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., Bloom, I., & Judson, E. (2000). Reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP). Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.
[50] Schmidt, W. H., McNight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (2002). A splintered vision: An investigation of US science and mathematics education. URL (last checked 2 January 2013). http://lsc-net.terc.edu/do/conference_material/6783/show/use_set-oth_pres.html
[51] Smylie, M. A., Allensworth, E., Greenberg, R. C., Harris, R., & Luppescu, S. (2001). Teacher professional development in Chicago: Supporting effective practice: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
[52] Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 324-328.
[53] Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
[54] Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 963-980. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<963::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-0
[55] Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137-158. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U
[56] Van Zee, E. H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 159-190. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<159::AID-TEA1002>3.0.CO;2-J
[57] Vanosdall, R., Klentschy, M., Hedges, L. V., & Weisbaum, K. S. (2007). A randomized study of the effects of scaffolded guided-inquiry instruction on student achievement in science. Paper Presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April 2007, 31 p.
[58] White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3-118. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2
[59] Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
[60] Windschitl, M. (2008). What is inquiry? A framework for thinking about authentic scientific practice in the classroom. In J. Luft, R. L. Bell & J. Gess-Newsome (Eds.), Science as inquiry in the secondary setting. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
[61] Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.