Mapping the Runner’s Mind: A New Methodology for Real-Time Tracking of Cognitions


Recording cognitions in real-time while running has been identified as one of the major limitations in the field of sport psychology. In this study, a new methodology was developed to overcome this limitation. For this purpose, 17 competitive long distance runners participated voluntarily. The experimental session consisted in identifying and storing cognitions (thoughts, emotions, sensations and mental images) while performing a 30 minutes treadmill run. In addition, participants were asked to register which of these cognitions were perceived as unpleasant. The mapping task showed a total of 1154 cognitions recorded, mostly thoughts. In general, during the session, cognitions perceived as unpleasant represented 13.43% of the total recorded. These cognitions were mainly directed to physical sensations that resulted from stimulations derived from the physical effort of running. Consequently, it is possible to claim an interaction relationship between sensations and exercise workload. The results attempt to demonstrate that the study of cognitions in real-time is deemed suitable during running.

Share and Cite:

Quintana, M. , Rivera, O. , Vega, R. & Ruiz, R. (2012). Mapping the Runner’s Mind: A New Methodology for Real-Time Tracking of Cognitions. Psychology, 3, 590-594. doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.38088.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Bachman, A., Brewer, B., & Peptitpas, A. (1997). Situation specificity of cognitions during running: Replication and extension. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 9, 204-211.doi:10.1080/10413209708406482
[2] Benyo, R., & Henderson, J. (2002). Running Encyclopedia. The ultimate source for today’s runner. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
[3] Borg, G. (1998). Perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
[4] Blanchard, C., Rodgers, W., & Gauvin, L. (2004). The influence of exercise duration and cognitions during running on feeling states in an indoor running track environment. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 5, 119-133. Hdoi:10.1016/S1469-0292(03)00006-2
[5] Buman, M. P., Molí, J. W., Giacobbi, P. R., & Brewer, B. W. (2008). Experiences and coping responses of “hitting the wall” for recreational marathon runners. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 20, 282-300. Hdoi:10.1080/10413200802078267
[6] Connolly, C., & Tenenbaum, G. (2010). Exertion-attention-flow linkage under different workloads. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1123-1145. Hdoi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00613.x
[7] Colman, A. (2009). A dictionary of psychology (3rd ed.). Oxford, LD: Oxford University Press.
[8] De la Vega, R., Rivera, O., Ramos, J., Ruiz, R., Segovia, J., Hernández, J., Rubio, V., Lopez-Silvarrey, J., & Quintana, M. (2011). Influence of cognitive strategies on perceived exertion at aerobic threshold speed in long distance runners. Proceedings of the 13th FEPSAC European Congress of Sport Psychology, Madeira, 12-17 July 2011, 324.
[9] De la Vega, R., Rivera, O., & Ruiz, R. (2011). Hardiness in endurance races: A comparison between skyrunning and 10 kilometers. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 20, 445-454.
[10] Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[11] García, T., Jiménez, R., Santos-Rosa, F., Reina, R., & Cervelló, E. (2008). Psychometric proprieties of the Spanish version of the Flow State Scale. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 660-669.
[12] Goode, H., & Roth, D. (1993). Factor analysis of cognitions during running: Association with mood change. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 15, 375-389.
[13] Goudas, M., & Theodorakis, Y. (2007). The effect of external versus internal types of feedback in goal setting on endurance performance. Athletic Insight, 9, 57-66.
[14] Jackson, S., & Eklund, R. (2002). Assessing flow in physical activity: The flow state scale-2 and dipositional flow scale-2. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 133-150.
[15] Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18, 17-35.
[16] LaCaille, R., Masters, K., & Heath, E. (2004). Effects of cognitive strategy and exercise setting on running performance, perceived exertion, affect and satisfaction. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 5, 461-476. Hdoi:10.1016/S1469-0292(03)00039-6
[17] Neil, R., Hanton, S., Mellalieu, S., & Fletcher, D. (2011). Competition stress and emotions in sport performers: the role of further appraisals. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12, 460-470.doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.02.001
[18] Nietfeld, J. (2003). An examination of metacognitive strategy use and monitoring skills by competitive middle distance runners. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15, 307-320. Hdoi:10.1080/714044199
[19] Nowak, P. (2010). Ultradistance running in view of a health and amateur sport. Human Movement, 11, 37-41. Hdoi:10.2478/v10038-010-0004-4
[20] Rose, E., & Parfitt, G. (2010). Pleasant for some and unpleasant for others: A protocol analysis of the cognitive factors that influence affective responses to exercise. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7, 1-15. Hdoi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-15
[21] Schomer, H. (1986). Mental strategies and the perception of effort of marathon runners. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 17, 41-59.
[22] Yamaji, K., Iguchi, F., & Hashisume, K. (2008). Assessment of running speed at predicted maximal heart rate (vHRmax.pred) in trained runners. Advances in Exercise and Sports Physiology, 13, 101-106.

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.