The Mind’s Irreducible Structure


The human mind is one of our most compelling subjects of scientific inquiry—and perhaps our most elusive. Despite impressive biological advances, neuroscience has yet to produce a logical and empirical analysis of the mind that exhibits universal, objective explanatory power of human mental phenomena on both an individual and species level. This article first explores the limitations of the current neuroscientific approach to the human mind and then argues for a reconceptualization of the relationship between human mental phenomena and the brain. Here I introduce a new interpretation of neuroscientific data and argue that this framework has the capacity to causally explain the link between social, psychological and biological levels of analysis.

Share and Cite:

Simes, M. (2012). The Mind’s Irreducible Structure. Sociology Mind, 2, 251-254. doi: 10.4236/sm.2012.23033.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Darwin, C. (2004). On the origin of species. New York: Barnes & Noble.
[2] Eichenbaum, H. (2000). A cortical hippocampal system for declarative memory. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 1, 41-50. doi:10.1038/35036213
[3] Greenfeld, L. (2006). An invitation to a dialogue. Nationalism and the mind: Essays on modern culture (pp. 162-175). Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
[4] Huxley, T. (1880). The coming of age of the origin of species. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 22, 1-24. doi:10.1038/022001a0
[5] Polanyi, M. (11968). Life’s irreducible structure. Science, 160, 1308-1312. doi:10.1126/science.160.3834.1308

Copyright © 2024 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.