Characteristics and Dynamic of Algal Communities in a New Impounded Hydro-Agricultural Dam Lake (Samendeni Reservoir) in Burkina Faso (Western Africa)

Abstract

Proliferation of microalgae is the result of a complex interaction between hydrological and physico-chemical variables influenced by climatic and anthropogenic factors. This study assessed algal communities in the Samendeni Dam Lake to serve as indicators of water quality for sustainable management of hydro-agricultural water resources. Therefore, physico-chemical parameters and microalgae were monitored in three sampling zones from November 2021 to October 2022. A comparison of physico-chemical parameters was realized between sampling zones and between seasons. CCA and RDA were used to establish the relationship between parameters and microalgae. The results show 96 species belonging to 46 genera, 30 families, 19 orders, 9 classes, and 7 phyla. Charophyta dominated microalgal communities in both dry and rainy seasons. Phytoplankton species reached 34 in the dry season and 41 in the rainy season, whereas periphyton revealed 41 species in both seasons. Phytoplankton abundances ranged from 213 to 5440 cells·mL−1 and 3 to 110 cells·cm−2 for periphyton. At p < 0.05, significant correlation of Charophyta with pH (r = 0.39, p-value = 0.04), EC (r = −0.41 - 0.91, p-value = 0.00 - 0.03), Transp (r = 0.73, p-value = 0.03), Ammo (r = 0.48, p-value = 0.01), Nitra (r = 0.81, p-value = 0.01), Nitri (r = 0.91, p-value = 0.00) was observed. Bacillariophyta significantly correlated to pH (r = 0.70, p-value = 0.04), EC (r = −0.51 - 0.94, p-value = 0.00 - 0.04), DO (r = −0.70 - 0.81, p-value = 0.01 - 0.04), Transp (r = −0.71 - 0.73, p-value = 0.02 - 0.03), Nitra (r = 0.84, p-value = 0.00) and OrthoP (r = 0.44 - 0.73, p-value = 0.02 - 0.03). Chlorophyta was significantly correlated to EC (r = −0.41 - 0.95, p-value = 0.00 - 0.03), Transp (r = −0.52, p-value = 0.01), Nitra (r = 0.71, p-value = 0.03), Ammo (r = 0.42, p-value = 0.03). Cyanophyta showed significant correlation with pH (r = 0.43, p-value = 0.02); EC (r = 0.68, p-value = 0.04), Transp (r = −0.44, p-value = 0.02), OrthoP (r = 0.44 - 0.54, p-value = 0.00 - 0.02) and Ammo (r = 0.43, p-value = 0.02). Ochrophyta significantly correlated to Nitra (r = 0.42, p-value = 0.03). While Charophyta and Chlorophyta species in the dam lake indicate relatively good water quality, recorded harmful Cyanophyta species show a possible deterioration of the habitat. Therefore, continuous water quality monitoring since the construction of dam lakes should be performed for careful water management.

Share and Cite:

Kabré, F. , Sanogo, S. and Zongo, B. (2024) Characteristics and Dynamic of Algal Communities in a New Impounded Hydro-Agricultural Dam Lake (Samendeni Reservoir) in Burkina Faso (Western Africa). Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 16, 671-694. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2024.1611038.

1. Introduction

New impounded lakes are often known to be sustainable productive systems [1] [2]. As primary producers of water bodies, the proliferation of microalgae is the result of a complex interaction between hydrological and physico-chemical variables [3]. These variables are strongly influenced and disturbed by anthropogenic activities [4]. As a result, important amounts of nutrients composed of phosphorus and nitrogen are loaded in water environments [5], leading to eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems, algal proliferation and degradation of water quality [6] [7].

Burkina Faso faces significant water resource challenges due to its semi-arid climate and increasing population demands [8]. The country has implemented hydro-agricultural water bodies to develop and improve agricultural production. The largest are the dam lakes of Kompienga in the Eastern region, Bagre in the South-East region and Samendeni in the western part of the country [9]. The Samendeni Dam Lake impounded on the Mouhoun River in 2017 is the most recent hydro-agricultural water body of the country. This water body is mostly used for agricultural practices, animal watering and fishing. Fertilizers and nutrients drained into water bodies stimulate the production of chlorophyllous organisms, particularly microalgae [10]. However, many authors reported that several types of microalgae from Cyanophyta and Miozoa are known to be harmful to human and animal health and may negatively compromise the development of the food chain [11]. According to Renuka et al. [12], microalgal communities composed of phytoplankton and periphyton are sustainable alternative for assessing the pollution levels of water ecosystems. In a hydro-agricultural freshwater system, this can contribute to environmental preservation and the enhancement of agricultural irrigation practices [13]. Thus, this study seeks to use microalgae as a baseline tool for monitoring water pollution in hydro-agricultural systems. The specific objectives are:

  • To measure physico-chemical parameters of the water, likely to foster algal development;

  • To assess diversity and abundance of microalgae communities;

  • To determine spatial and temporal variations of algal communities in relation with water quality.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Characteristics of the Study Area

The Samendeni Dam Lake is located between the geographical coordinates of 11˚23' north latitude and 4˚42' west longitude. It has been listed since 2020 as a wetland of international importance [14]. Considered as the third largest dam in Burkina Faso after Kompienga (16,000 to 20,000 ha) and Bagré (21,000 to 25,000 ha), the area of the dam is estimated between 10,500 and 15,300 ha [9]. Its watershed drains a volume of water estimated at 1,050,000,000 m3 [15]. The study area is covered by the Sudanese and Sudano-Sahelian zones and the inter-annual mean precipitation was 1288.27 mm over the period 2012-2022. The rainy season is generally from May to October and daily temperatures vary between 23.50˚C (December) to 31.30˚C (April). The study was carried out on 2 horizontal transects going from one bank (coastline) to the other, each consisting of 5 sampling stations. The length of transect 1 is 4613 m and that of transect 2 is 4984 m. An average distance of 4850 m was observed between transects, while a distance of 1200 m was between 2 sampling stations on a transect (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Location map of the Samendeni Dam Lake.

2.2. Sampling Method and Species Identification

The 10 sampling stations from transects 1 and 2 (Figure 1) were grouped into 3 main sampling zones for the study according to the similar characteristics they have. The open water zone 1 (OWZ1) that includes stations 1, 5, 6, and 10 is strongly influenced by human activities and characterized by the presence of macrophytes, with an average depth of 1.50 ± 0.30 meters. The open-water zone 2 (OWZ2) that includes stations 2, 4, 7, and 9 is the open and well-lit zone of the body of freshwater, with an average depth of 12.00 ± 3.00 meters. The open-water zone 3 (OWZ3) includes stations 3 and 8, located below the range of effective light penetration in the body of freshwater, with an average depth of 21.25 ± 2.60 meters. Measurements of physico-chemical parameters and sampling of microalgae were done on the 15th of every month, from November 2021 to October 2022 at the station of the 3 sampling zones. As the site is located at the Hauts-Bassins Region of Burkina Faso, the study was conducted on-site with the authorization of the Regional Department of Agriculture, Animal and Fisheries Resources of this region.

Water pH, electrical conductivity (µs·cm−1), dissolved oxygen (mg·L−1) and temperature (˚C) were measured at a depth of 40 cm using a multiparameter probe Bante900P. Water transparency (m) was estimated using a Secchi disc. Concentrations of Ammonium nitrogen ( NH 4 + ), nitrites ( NO 2 ), nitrates ( NO 3 ) and orthophosphates ( PO 4 3 ) were determined using standard methods [16]. Therefore, they were determined using a spectrophotometer HACH DR3900 at 640 nm, 540 nm, 410 nm and 880 nm, respectively.

Phytoplankton were sampled at a depth of 40 cm in each station of the 3 sampling zones. They were sampled according to the sampling period as described above. A volume of 40 mL of freshwater was collected and preserved with 5% formalin at ambient temperature [9]. At the laboratory, samples were left undisturbed in a dark place for 24 hours to allow algal cells to settle [9]. After settling, the top water was removed, and 20 mL of subsamples were used for qualitative and quantitative analysis [7].

A periphyton trapping device (Figure 2) was an artificial support made up of square wood, suspended between two wires stretched parallel and spaced 25 cm apart. It was held at the bottom of OWZ1 by a stone and at the surface of the water by a float. There were 3 rows of 5 square woods. A square wood measured 10 cm on a side. The trapping device was settled only at the four stations of the OWZ1 for sampling. Periphyton was sampled by brushing both sides of wooden plates and collected in vials. The samples were immediately preserved in 20 mL of 5% formalin at ambient temperature for qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Microalgae species were examined and photographed using an optical binocular microscope BELONA, manufactured by OPTO-EDU (Beijing) Co. LTD., China. They were identified on the basis of realized images using standard works such as Niamien-Ebrottié , Seu-Anoï , Adon , Kouassi , Wehr and Koffi . Identified species were verified and classified using the taxonomical criteria of AlgaeBase .

Figure 2. Periphyton trapping device.

2.3. Quantitative Analysis of Microalgae

Phytoplankton abundance and periphyton density were determined using a Malassez chamber that was filled with a homogeneous solution and kept undisturbed for 5 min to allow particles to settle . After settling, all individuals in the chamber were counted four times for each sample of periphyton or sub-sample of phytoplankton, and the relative abundance (RA) was determined using the following formula :

RA= N  10 6 Vs q ( Vs + v ) (1)

N: Number of individuals per room; Vs: Volume of sub-sample for phytoplankton or sample for periphyton; q: Volume of the counting room; v: Volume of formaldehyde solution used for preservation.

The relative abundance of phytoplankton in the samples (RAs) was determined by the following formula:

RAs=RA k 1 (2)

k: Dilution factor (0.50).

The density of periphyton was obtained from the formula:

D =  RA( Vs+v ) S   (3)

Vs: Volume of sample; S: Total area of periphyton trapping device (3000 cm2).

2.4. Quantitative Analysis of Microalgae

The frequency of occurrence (F) of a taxon is the ratio between the number of samples (Pa) from a station where the taxon is present and the total number (P) of samples . It is calculated according to the formula:

F ( % )= Pa P 100

Pa: Number of samples; P: Total number of samples.

Depending on the value of F, three groups of species can be distinguished: the constant species (F >50%), the accessory species (25 < F < 50%) and the accidental species (F < 25%).

Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H'), Pielou’s evenness index (J) and Similarity Sørensen index (S) were performed using the package vegan from the R software version 4.4.1.

Hutcheson’s t-test (Diversity t-test) was performed with the software R-4.4.1 to compare Shannon-Wiener diversity indices between the sampling zones using the package ecolTest.

Comparison of physico-chemical parameters between the sampling zones and seasons was performed using the software R-4.4.1. After determining the normality of the data with the Shapiro-Wilk test, an ANOVA test was applied to the physico-chemical parameters that followed a normal distribution, and the Kruskal-Walli’s test was used for the other parameters.

Water pH, electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature (Temp), transparency (Transp), Nitrates (Nitra), Nitrites (Nitri), Orthophosphates (OrthoP), Ammonium nitrogen (Ammo) and abundance of microalgal species were used for this analysis. To study the distribution of phytoplankton and periphyton species in relation to environmental parameters, Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) was employed to assess variations in microalgal composition and determine the length of the different environmental gradients. For gradient lengths shorter than 4 standard deviations (SD), as observed for periphyton, linear analysis methods such as Redundancy Analysis (RDA) were deemed more appropriate than unimodal methods. In contrast, Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) was used for phytoplankton, where gradient lengths exceeded 4 SD, indicating a preference for unimodal response models. It allowed analyzing the links between environmental and biotic variables [27] and cross-referencing monthly microalgae density data with monthly environmental data. Monte Carlos permutation test (permutation 1000) was performed to highlight the environmental variables that best influence the species’ abundance. Correlation coefficient was used to determine and measure the intensity of the relationship between the different parameters and the abundance of algal species. Correlation test was performed to highlight the environmental variables that best influence the species abundance. The Correlations between environmental variables and the abundance of microalgal communities, CCA and RDA were performed using XLSTAT 2023.2.0 software.

3. Results

3.1. Physico-Chemical Variables of Freshwater

The average value of pH in Samendeni Dam Lake was 7.88 ± 0.43. Those of electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen, temperature, transparency, nitrates, nitrites, orthophosphates and ammonium nitrogen was 74.59 ± 4.76 µs·cm−1, 7.25 ± 0.49 mg·L−1, 29.37˚C ± 1.40˚C, 1.58 ± 0.24 m, 0.62 ± 0.28 mg·L−1, 0.01 ± 0.02 mg·L−1, 0.06 ± 0.14 mg·L−1 and 0.39 ± 0.29 mg·L−1, respectively. Comparison of the physico-chemical parameters between dry season and rainy season (Figure 3) using ANOVA test showed significant differences for pH (F = 7.77, p-value = 0.01), electrical conductivity (F = 52.81, p-value = 0.00) and dissolved oxygen (F = 8.40, p-value = 0.01). Non-parametric test showed significant differences between dry and rainy seasons for transparency (X2 = 24.83, p-value = 0.00), nitrites (X2 = 18.50, p-value = 0.00), orthophosphates (X2 = 35.93, p-value = 0.00) and ammonium nitrogen (X2 = 20.21, p-value = 0.00). Temperature (X2 = 0.27, p-value = 0.61) and nitrates (X2 = 2.96, p-value = 0.09) did not show significant differences. Comparison of physico-chemical parameters between sampling zones using ANOVA did not show significant differences between sampling zones for pH (F = 1.39, p-value = 0.26) and dissolved oxygen (F = 0.32, p-value = 0.73). Non-parametric test did not show significant differences for electrical conductivity (X2 = 0.08, p-value = 0.96), temperature (X2 = 0.18, p-value = 0.91), transparency (X2 = 0.58, p-value = 0.75), nitrates (X2 = 0.023, p-value = 0.99), nitrites (X2 = 0.16, p-value = 0.93), orthophosphates (X2 = 0.04, p-value = 0.98) and ammonium nitrogen (X2 = 0.19, p-value = 0.91).

Figure 3. Spatial and seasonal variation of physico-chemical parameters of Samendeni Dam Lake.

3.2. Diversity and Relative Abundance of Algal Microflora

In the Samendeni Dam Lake, a total of 96 species belonging to 46 genera, 30 families, 19 orders, 9 classes and 7 phyla were recorded. From phytoplankton communities, Charophyta was the most represented phylum during the study period, with 14 species corresponding to 41.18% of total recorded species at dry season and 17 species corresponding to 41.46% of total recorded species at rainy season. Miozoa was the least represented phylum during the dry season, with 2 species corresponding to 5.88% of total recorded species, while Ochrophyta was the least represented phylum during the rainy season, with only 1 species corresponding to 2.44% of total recorded species. From periphyton communities, Charophyta was also the most represented phylum during the study period, with 16 species corresponding to 39.02% of total recorded species at the dry season and 14 species corresponding to 34.15% of total recorded species during the rainy season. Miozoa was the least represented phylum during the study period, with 2 species corresponding to 4.88% of total recorded species during the dry season and only 1 species corresponding to 2.44% of total recorded species during the rainy season.

Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H') of phytoplankton at dry season shows that OWZ1 and OWZ3 were the most diversified with species. At rainy season, OWZ1 was the most diversified (Table 1). Significant differences of H’ values were observed between dry and rainy seasons at OWZ1 (t = −5.73, p-value = 0.00), OWZ2 (t = 20.14, p-value = 0.00) and OWZ3 (t = 24.40, p-value = 0.00) (Table 1). Regarding periphyton, a significant difference of H’ values was observed between dry and rainy seasons (t = 3.47, p-value = 0.00), indicating that dry season was most diversified in species (Table 2). The high evenness (J) values of both phytoplankton and periphyton (Table 1, Table 2) indicate a co-dominance of the species abundance in time and space.

Table 1. Shannon-Wiener diversity and Pielou’s evenness indices of phytoplankton species at the sampling zones of Samendeni Dam Lake at dry season and rainy season. Diversity values with the different letters indicate that these values were significantly different between seasons (Hutcheson t-test used for comparison).

Dry season

Rainy season

H’

J

H’

J

Open-water zone (OWZ1)

2.86a

0.89

2.90c

0.88

Open-water zone (OWZ2)

2.77b

0.90

2.59d

0.83

Open-water zone (OWZ3)

2.86a

0.94

2.62e

0.89

Table 2. Shannon-Wiener diversity and Pielou’s evenness indices of periphyton species of Samendeni Dam Lake at dry season and rainy season. Diversity values with the different letters indicate that these values were significantly different between seasons (Hutcheson t-test used for comparison).

Dry season

Rainy season

H’

3.23a

3.01b

J

0.87

0.81

Kruskal-Wallis test revealed that at dry season, there were significant differences concerning the abundance of phytoplankton species between OWZ1 and OWZ2 (df = 11, p-value = 0.00), OWZ1 and OWZ3 (df = 9, p-value = 0.01) and OWZ2 and OWZ3 (df = 9, p-value = 0.00) (Figure 4). At rainy season, significant differences were observed between OWZ1 and OWZ2 (df = 7, p-value = 0.01) and OWZ2 and OWZ3 (df = 5, p-value = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in phytoplankton abundance between OWZ1 and OWZ2 (df = 5, p-value = 0.07). For periphyton density, a significant difference was observed between dry and rainy seasons (df = 11, p-value = 0.00) (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Microalgae proliferation in the sampling site of Samendeni Dam Lake.

At dry season, phytoplankton species Closterium acutum Brébisson had the highest abundance at the three sampling zones with 5440 cells·mL−1 at OWZ1, 4760 cells·mL−1 at OWZ2 and 2465 cells·mL−1 at OWZ3. At rainy season, Oscillatoria geminatum Schwabe ex Gomont had the highest abundance with 4781 cells·mL−1 at OWZ1, 5631 cells·mL−1 at OWZ2 and 3081 cells·mL−1 at OWZ3 (Table 3). Regarding periphyton at dry season (Table 3), the species Peridinium sp.2 (57 cells·cm−2) had the highest density and Stauroneis anceps Ehrenberg (110 cells·cm−2) at rainy season.

Table 3. Seasonal abundance of phytoplankton and periphyton density in the Samendeni Dam Lake in dry season (DS) and rainy season (RS).

Taxonomy

Phytoplankton abundance (cells·mL−1)

Periphyton density (cells·cm−2)

Phylum

Classe

Order

Family

Genera

Species

DS

RS

DS

RS

Bacillariophyta

Coscinodiscophyceae

Aulacoseirales

Aulacoseiraceae

Aulacoseira

Aulacoseira granulata (Ehrenberg) Simonsen 1979

482

177

3

27

Bacillariophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Cymbellales

Cymbellaceae

Cymbella

Cymbella cymbiformis C. Agardh 1830

0

71

0

0

Bacillariophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Cymbellales

Gomphonemataceae

Encyonema

Encyonema elginense (Krammer) D.G.Mann 1990

0

0

3

13

Bacillariophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Cymbellales

Gomphonemataceae

Encyonema

Encyonema silesiacum (Bleisch) D. G. Mann 1990

0

0

23

10

Bacillariophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Fragilariales

Fragilariaceae

Fragilaria

Fragilaria subconstricta Østrup 1910

0

142

0

0

Bacillariophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Cymbellales

Gomphonemataceae

Gomphonema

Gomphonema gracile Ehrenberg 1838

0

0

0

3

Bacillariophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Naviculales

Naviculaceae

Navicula

Navicula sp.

142

0

0

0

Bacillariophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Naviculales

Naviculaceae

Navicula

Navicula tripunctata (O.F. Müller) Bory 1822

0

0

7

30

Bacillariophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Naviculales

Neidiaceae

Neidium

Neidium affine (Ehrenberg) Pfitzer 1871

0

0

13

10

Bacillariophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Naviculales

pinulariaceae

Pinnularia

Pinnularia brebissonii (Kützing) Rabenhorst 1864

0

0

13

0

Bacillariophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Naviculales

Pinulariaceae

Pinnularia

Pinnularia viridis (Nitzsch) Ehrenberg 1843

0

0

7

17

Bacillariophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Naviculales

Sellaphoraceae

Sellaphora

Sellaphora pupula (Kützing) Mereschkovsky 1902

113

0

3

0

Bacillariophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Naviculales

Stauroneidaceae

Stauroneis

Stauroneis anceps Ehrenberg 1843

0

0

0

110

Bacillariophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Surirellales

Surirellaceae

Surirella

Surirella sp.

0

0

0

3

Bacillariophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Bacillariales

Bacillariaceae

Tryblionella

Tryblionella scalaris (Ehrenberg) Siver & P.B.Hamilton 2005

0

0

0

3

Bacillariophyta

Bacillariophyceae

Licmophorales

Ulnariaceae

Ulnaria

Ulnaria ulna (Nitzsch) Compère 2001

0

0

7

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Actinotaenium

Actinotaenium australe (Raciborski) Croasdale 1981

0

142

0

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Closteriaceae

Closterium

Closterium acutum Brébisson 1848

4222

2302

0

77

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Closteriaceae

Closterium

Closterium gracile Brébisson ex Ralfs 1848

3683

1487

0

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Cosmarium

Cosmarium binum Nordstedt 1880

0

0

3

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Cosmarium

Cosmarium ceratophoroides Bourrelly 1961

0

0

3

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Cosmarium

Cosmarium connatum Brébisson ex Ralfs 1848

0

0

3

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Cosmarium

Cosmarium contractum 0. Kirchner 1878

2068

354

0

10

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Cosmarium

Cosmarium decoratum West & G.S. West 1895

198

0

0

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Cosmarium

Cosmarium laeve Rabenhorst 1868

0

0

0

3

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Cosmarium

Cosmarium margaritatum (P.Lundell) J.Roy & Bisset 1886

0

0

3

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Cosmarium

Cosmarium punctulatum Brébisson 1856

0

0

3

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Cosmarium

Cosmarium reniforme (Ralfs) W. Archer 1874

0

106

0

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Cosmarium

Cosmarium regulare Schmidle 1894

0

0

3

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Cosmarium

Cosmarium spinuliferum West & G.S.West 1902

0

0

3

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Cosmarium

Cosmarium undulatum var. minutum Wittrock 1869

142

0

0

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Euastrum

Euastrum denticulatum F. Gay 1884

0

106

40

10

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Euastrum

Euastrum trigibberum West & G.S.West 1895

0

0

3

7

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Gonatozygaceae

Gonatozygon

Gonatozygon aculeatum W. N. Hastings 1892

822

248

0

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Gonatozygaceae

Gonatozygon

Gonatozygon kinahanii (W. Archer) Rabenhorst 1868

0

496

3

7

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Gonatozygaceae

Gonatozygon

Gonatozygon pilosum Wolle 1882

878

496

3

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Zygnematales

Zygnemataceae

Mougeotia

Mougeotia sp.

0

0

0

7

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Spondylosium

Spondylosium tetragonum West & G. S. West 1892

595

142

7

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Staurastrum

Staurastrum brevispina Brébisson 1848

0

0

3

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Staurastrum

Staurastrum cingulum (West & G.S.West) G.M.Smith 1922

0

0

3

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Staurastrum

Staurastrum gracile var. elongatum A.M.Scott & Prescott 1958

0

0

0

3

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Staurastrum

Staurastrum hystrix Ralfs 1848

963

142

0

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Staurastrum

Staurastrum laeve Ralfs 1848

368

496

17

13

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Staurastrum

Staurastrum leptocladum Nordstedt 1870

0

0

0

3

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Staurastrum

Staurastrum manfeldtii Delponte 1878

0

0

0

7

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Staurastrum

Staurastrum muticum Brébisson ex Ralfs 1848

340

425

0

3

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Staurastrum

Staurastrum quadrangulare Brébisson 1848

0

0

7

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Staurastrum

Staurastrum quadricornutum J. Roy & J. Bisset 1886

142

0

0

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Staurastrum

Staurastrum sp.

0

142

0

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Staurastrum

Staurastrum teliferum Ralfs 1848

0

142

0

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Staurastrum

Staurastrum tohopekaligense Wolle 1885

1218

956

0

0

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Desmidiales

Desmidiaceae

Staurastrum

Staurastrum volans West & G.S.West 1895

567

319

0

3

Charophyta

Zygnematophyceae

Zygnematales

Zygnemataceae

Zygnema

Zygnema sp.

0

0

0

3

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Scenedesmaceae

Coelastrum

Coelastrum microporum Nägeli 1855

0

0

0

3

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Scenedesmaceae

Desmodesmus

Desmodesmus armatus (Chodat) E. H. Hegewald 2000

170

177

0

0

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Scenedesmaceae

Desmodesmus

Desmodesmus communis (E. Hegewald) E. Hegewald 2000

680

425

7

73

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Scenedesmaceae

Desmodesmus

Desmodesmus magnus (Meyen) P. M. Tsarenko 2000

0

0

27

0

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Scenedesmaceae

Desmodesmus

Desmodesmus opoliensis (P.G.Richter) E.Hegewald 2000

142

106

7

0

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Scenedesmaceae

Desmodesmus

Desmodesmus perforatus (Lemmermann) E.Hegewald 2000

0

0

17

0

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Chlamydomonadales

Volvocaceae

Eudorina

Eudorina elegans Ehrenberg 1832

0

248

0

3

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Selenastraceae

Messastrum

Messastrum gracile (Reinsch) T.S.Garcia 2021

170

106

3

3

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Hydrodictyaceae

Monactinus

Monactinus simplex (Meyen) Corda 1839

170

0

0

0

Chlorophyta

Trebouxiophyceae

Chlorellales

Oocystaceae

Oocystis

Oocystis borgei J. W. Snow 1903

0

142

0

0

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Hydrodictyaceae

Pediastrum

Pediastrum duplex Meyen 1829

0

0

10

0

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Chlamydomonadales

Volvocaceae

Pleodorina

Pleodorina californica W. R. Shaw 1894

0

177

0

0

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Scenedesmaceae

Scenedesmus

Scenedesmus naegelii Brébisson 1856

0

0

0

3

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Scenedesmaceae

Scenedesmus

Scenedesmus sp.

170

0

0

0

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Scenedesmaceae

Tetradesmus

Tetradesmus dimorphus (Turpin) M.J.Wynne 2016

0

0

0

13

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Scenedesmaceae

Tetradesmus

Tetradesmus lagerheimii M.J.Wynne & Guiry 2016

0

0

0

3

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Hydrodictyaceae

Tetraëdron

Tetraëdron caudatum (Corda) Hansgirg 1888

0

0

0

3

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Hydrodictyaceae

Tetraëdron

Tetraëdron minimum (A. Braun) Hansgirg 1889

425

283

0

0

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Scenedesmaceae

Tetrastrum

Tetrastrum elegans Playfair 1917

0

106

0

0

Chlorophyta

Chlorophyceae

Sphaeropleales

Scenedesmaceae

Tetrastrum

Tetrastrum staurogeniiforme (Schröder) Lemmermann 1900

170

0

0

0

Cyanophyta

Cyanophyceae

Chroococcales

Microcystaceae

Aphanothece

Aphanothece microscopica Nägeli 1849

0

0

3

0

Cyanophyta

Cyanophyceae

Chroococcales

Chroococcaceae

Chroococus

Chroococus sp.

198

0

0

0

Cyanophyta

Cyanophyceae

Chroococcales

Chroococcaceae

Johanseninema

Johanseninema constrictum (Szafer) Hasler, Dvorák & Poulícková 2014

1558

142

0

3

Cyanophyta

Cyanophyceae

Chroococcales

Microcystaceae

Merismopedia

Merismopedia elegans A. Braun ex Kützing 1849

822

283

0

0

Cyanophyta

Cyanophyceae

Chroococcales

Microcystaceae

Merismopedia

Merismopedia glauca (Ehrenberg) Kützing 1845

0

177

3

13

Cyanophyta

Cyanophyceae

Chroococcales

Microcystaceae

Merismopedia

Merismopedia tenuissima Lemmermann 1898

0

283

0

0

Cyanophyta

Cyanophyceae

Chroococcales

Microcystaceae

Merismopedia

Merismopedia tranquilla (Ehrenberg) Trevisan 1845

283

283

7

0

Cyanophyta

Cyanophyceae

Oscillatoriales

Oscillatoriaceae

Oscillatoria

Oscillatoria corallinae Gomont 1890

397

177

0

0

Cyanophyta

Cyanophyceae

Oscillatoriales

Oscillatoriaceae

Oscillatoria

Oscillatoria geminatum Schwabe ex Gomont 1892

2125

4498

0

0

Cyanophyta

Cyanophyceae

Oscillatoriales

Oscillatoriaceae

Oscillatoria

Oscillatoria limosa C. Agardh ex Gomont 1892

0

71

0

0

Cyanophyta

Cyanophyceae

Oscillatoriales

Oscillatoriaceae

Oscillatoria

Oscillatoria tenuis C. Agardh ex Gomont 1892

0

142

0

0

Cyanophyta

Cyanophyceae

Oscillatoriales

Oscillatoriaceae

Oscillatoria

Oscillatoria tenuis f. natans (Gomont) Elenkin 1949

0

0

0

7

Cyanophyta

Cyanophyceae

Oscillatoriales

Oscillatoriaceae

Phormidium

Phormidium hamelii (Frémy) Anagnostidis & Komárek 1988

595

0

0

0

Cyanophyta

Cyanophyceae

Leptolyngbyales

Leptolyngbyaceae

Planktolyngbya

Planktolyngbya limnetica (Lemmermann) Komárková Legnerová & Cronberg 1992

0

0

3

7

Cyanophyta

Cyanophyceae

Pseudanabaenales

Pseudanabaenaceae

Pseudanabaena

Pseudanabaena catenata Lauterborn 1915

0

0

37

23

Euglenozoa

Euglenophyceae

Euglenales

Phacaceae

Phacus

Phacus sp.

0

0

0

3

Euglenozoa

Euglenophyceae

Euglenales

Euglenaceae

Trachelomonas

Trachelomonas abrupta Svirenko 1914

0

0

30

0

Euglenozoa

Euglenophyceae

Euglenales

Euglenaceae

Trachelomonas

Trachelomonas lefevrei Deflandre 1926

0

0

10

0

Euglenozoa

Euglenophyceae

Euglenales

Euglenaceae

Trachelomonas

Trachelomonas sp.

0

0

0

3

Euglenozoa

Euglenophyceae

Euglenales

Euglenaceae

Trachelomonas

Trachelomonas volvocinopsis Svirenko 1914

0

0

23

23

Miozoa

Dinophyceae

Peridiniales

Peridiniaceae

Peridinium

Peridinium sp. 1

1303

1239

3

0

Miozoa

Dinophyceae

Peridiniales

Peridiniaceae

Peridinium

Peridinium sp. 2

680

850

57

13

Ochrophyta

Chrysophyceae

Chromulinales

Dinobryaceae

Dinobryon

Dinobryon sertularia Ehrengerg 1834

0

71

0

0

3.3. Occurrence of Microalgae in the Sampling Zones

Considering the two categories of species, constant species were the most abundant at dry season (62%), whilst at rainy season, accessories species were the most abundant (56%). At dry season, among the 34 recorded phytoplankton species, 3 species (Cosmarium decoratum West & G.S.West, Sellaphora pupula (Kützing) Mereschkovsky and Staurastrum quadricornutum J. Roy & J. Bisset) were identified exclusively at OWZ1; 2 species (Chroococcus sp. and Navicula sp.) were found only at OWZ2 and 4 species (Cosmarium undulatum var. minutum Wittrock, Monactinus simplex (Meyen) Corda, Scenedesmus sp., Tetrastrum staurogeniiforme (Schröder) Lemmermann) were restricted at OWZ3 (Figure 5). At rainy season, among 41 recorded phytoplankton species, 6 species (Cosmarium reniforme (Ralfs) W. Archer, Euastrum denticulatum F. Gay, Fragilaria subconstricta Østrup, Merismopedia glauca (Ehrenberg) Kützing, Staurastrum sp. and Staurastrum teliferum Ralfs) were exclusively found at OWZ1; 6 species (Cymbella cymbiformis C. Agardh, Oocystis borgei J. W. Snow, Oscillatoria limosa C. Agardh ex Gomont, Oscillatoria tenuis C. Agardh ex Gomont, Pleodorina californica W. R. Shaw and Tetrastrum elegans Playfair) were identified solely at OWZ2 and 2 species (Actinotaenium australe (Raciborski) Croasdale and Dinobryon sertularia Ehrengerg) were found only at OWZ3 (Figure 5).

When comparing algal species composition between sampling zones by using Sørensen similarity index (S), similarities were found at dry season between sampling zones (S = 0.50 - 0.57). No similarities were found between sampling zones at rainy season (S < 0.50).

3.4. Impact of Water Quality on Phytoplankton and Periphyton Communities

Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) and the Pearson correlation test show that phytoplankton species were diversely influenced by physico-chemical parameters (Figure 6). At p < 0.05, pH was positively correlated to C. acutum (r = 0.39, p-value = 0.04), C. gracile Brébisson ex Ralfs (r = 0.39, p-value = 0.04), and J. constrictum (Szafer) Hasler, Dvorák & Poulícková (r = 0.43, p-value = 0.02). Electrical conductivity was negatively correlated to A. granulata (r = −0.51, p-value = 0.01), Cosmarium decoratum West & G.S. West (r = −0.41, p-value = 0.03) and M. gracile (Reinsch) T.S. Garcia (r = −0.41, p-value = 0.03). Transparency was negatively correlated to Cymbella cymbiformis C. Agardh (r = −0.44, p-value = 0.02), Oscillatoria limosa C. Agardh ex Gomont (r = −0.44, p-value = 0.02) and Tetrastrum elegans Playfair (r = −0.52, p-value = 0.01). Nitrates showed positive correlation with Dinobryon sertularia Ehrengerg (r = 0.42, p-value = 0.03). Orthophosphates showed a positive correlation with J. constrictum (r = 0.44, p-value = 0.02), Merismopedia elegans A. Braun ex Kützing (r = 0.54, p-value = 0.00), Navicula sp. (r = 0.45, p-value = 0.02) and Oscillatoria corallinae Gomont (r = 0.50, p-value = 0.01). Ammonium nitrogen showed a positive correlation with Merismopedia elegans (r = 0.43, p-value = 0.02), Scenedesmus sp. (r = 0.42, p-value = 0.03) and Staurastrum hystrix Ralfs (r = 0.48, p-value = 0.01).

Figure 5. Few most characteristic microalgae identified in sampling zones of the Samendeni Dam Lake.

Figure 6. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of phytoplankton communities and physico-chemical variables. Augr: A. granulata, Clac: C. acutum, Clgr: C. gracile, Code: C. decoratum, Coun: C. undulatum, Cycy: C. cymbiformis, Deop: D. opoliensis, Dise: D. sertularia, Goac: G. aculeatum, Gopi: G. pilosum, Joco: J. constrictum, Meel: M. elegans, Megr: M. gracile, Mosi: M. simplex, Nasp: Navicula sp., Osco: O. corallinae, Osli: O. limosa, Phha: P. hamelii, Scsp: Scenedesmus sp., Sthy: S. hystrix, Teel: T. elegans.

Redundancy analysis (Figure 7) and Pearson correlation test show that periphyton species were diversely influenced by physico-chemical parameters. At p < 0.05, pH was positively correlated to Neidium affine (Ehrenberg) Pfitzer (r = 0.70, p-value = 0.04). Electrical conductivity was positively correlated to Aulacoseira granulata (Ehrenberg) Simonsen (r = 0.71, p-value = 0.03), C. acutum (r = 0.84, p-value = 0.01), Desmodesmus communis (E. Hegewald) E. Hegewald (r = 0.73, p-value = 0.03), Encyonema elginense (Krammer) D.G.Mann (r = 0.94, p-value = 0.00), Eudorina elegans Ehrenberg (r = 0.80, p-value = 0.01), M. glauca (r = 0.68, p-value = 0.04), Pinnularia viridis (Nitzsch) Ehrenberg (r = 0.68, p-value = 0.04), Staurastrum volans West & G.S.West (r = 0.91, p-value = 0.00), S. anceps (r = 0.83, p-value = 0.01), Surirella sp. (r = 0.81, p-value = 0.01) and Tetradesmus dimorphus (Turpin) M.J.Wynne (r = 0.95, p-value = 0.00). Dissolved oxygen was positively correlated to N. affine (r = 0.81, p-value = 0.01) and negatively with Pinnularia brebissonii (Kützing) Rabenhorst (r = −0.70, p-value = 0.04). Transparency was positively correlated to Gonatozygon pilosum Wolle, S. pupula, Spondylosium tetragonum West & G. S. West, Staurastrum brevispina Brébisson and Staurastrum cingulum (West & G.S.West) G.M.Smith (r = 0.73, p-value = 0.03) and negatively with Gomphonema gracile Ehrenberg (r = −0.71, p-value = 0.03). Nitrates were positively correlated to Pinnularia viridis (r = 0.84, p-value = 0.00), S. volans (r = 0.81, p-value = 0.01) and T. dimorphus (r = 0.71, p-value = 0.03). Nitrites showed a positive correlation to Euastrum trigibberum West & G.S.West (r = 0.91, p-value = 0.00). Orthophosphates were positively correlated to Gomphonema gracile (r = 0.73, p-value = 0.03).

Figure 7. Redundancy analysis (RDA) of periphyton communities and physico-chemical variables. Augr: A. granulata, Clac: C. acutum, Deco: D. communis, Dema: Desmodesmus magnus, Enel: E. elginense, Eutr: E. trigibberum, Euel: E. elegans, Gogr: G. gracile, Gopi: G. pilosum, Megl: M. glauca, Natr: N. tripunctata, Neaf: N. affine, Pibr: P. brebissonii, Pivi: P. viridis, Scna: S. naegelii, Sepu: S. pupula, Spte: S. tetragonum, Stbr: S. brevispina, Stci: S. cingulum, Stgr: S. gracile, Stan: S. anceps, Stvo: S. volans, Susp: Surirella sp., Trdi: T. dimorphus.

4. Discussion

4.1. Physico-Chemical Variables of Freshwater

Understanding the ecological processes of a freshwater habitat using physico-chemical parameters is crucial for assessing its ecological health and long-term stability [28]. In this study, some major water parameters were used in this way. These parameters play a very important role in the survival of both micro and macro-organisms in an aquatic ecosystem [29]. Thus, measured pH was found to be within the standard of natural waters that is between 6.00 and 8.50 [30]. Standard values of pH were previously noted by different works in Burkina Faso such as those of Ouattara et al. [31] on the Loumbila reservoir (pH = 7.92) 68 years after impoundment and Zongo et al. [7] on the Bagré reservoir (pH = 8.31) 6 years after impoundment. The values of pH between 7.50 and 8.50 are favorable for good production of microalgae [7]. Electrical conductivity of 74.59 ± 4.76 µS/cm is characteristic of a system with limited mineralization and relatively low anthropogenic influence, reflecting a water body in its early stages of nutrient and mineral cycling [32]. However, high values can prevent light penetration and medium oxygenation [33]. The temperature stability of 29.37˚C ± 1.40˚C is ecologically significant for tropical freshwater systems, as it supports year-round biological activity and ensures a relatively consistent metabolic rate for aquatic organisms [34]. The water temperature was practically the same throughout water body [31] [35]. It is influenced by climatic variables such as air temperature, solar radiation, wind speed, flow rate, groundwater [36]. In Samendeni freshwater, temperatures were in the range of 18˚C - 30˚C, facilitating the development of phytoplankton [7]. Water transparency of 1.58 ± 0.24 m in Samendeni Dam Lake was higher than that measured by Zongo et al. [7] (Transp = 0.49 m) and Ouattara et al. [31] (Transp = 0.57 m) in Bagré and Loumbila reservoirs, respectively. The high transparency of the Samendeni dam lake proves that this newly impounded reservoir is less disturbed compared to the others. However, the high transparency of water at dry season compared to rainy season could be explained by water flows from the blackish-colored forest litter, located at the dam lake shore drained into the water body during rainy season [37]. Dissolved oxygen of 7.25 ± 0.49 mg·L−1 ranges within the standard of the required values [3 to 8 mg·L−1) for natural waters [38]. This is essential in supporting aquatic organisms and indicating good water quality. Higher oxygen levels enhance the metabolic activity, stimulate primary production and alter nutrient cycling, potentially leading to nutrient depletion in the water column [39]. The best water quality should correspond to total nitrogen and total phosphorus concentrations close to zero [40]. Therefore, nutrient profile of Samendeni Reservoir, characterised by low concentrations of nitrates, nitrites, ammonium nitrogen and orthophosphates, reflects a system with limited nutrient loading and low eutrophication risk [41]. However, the significant increase in the water contents of nitrites, ammonium nitrogen, and orthophosphates at rainy season suggests that external inputs from runoff are an important driver of nutrient dynamics [42]. Seasonal variations likely enhance nutrient availability for phytoplanktonic and periphytic microalgal communities, promoting growth during the rainy season. According to Cook et al. [43], this episodic nutrient enrichment of the water body could lead to temporary algal blooms, altering production rates, and potentially influencing competition among algal species.

4.2. Algal Microflora in the Lake

Anthropogenic factors (e.g., agriculture, animal watering, fishing) and climatic variables (e.g., precipitation, solar radiation, wind) influencing physico-chemical parameters of water contribute to the variation in species’ richness, composition, abundance and assemblage of microalgae in water bodies [44]. The dominance of Charophyta in the Samendeni Dam Lake during dry and rainy seasons indicates the adaptability and resilience of this taxonomical group to changing environmental conditions. Charophyta can grow well in neutral pH (7.5 to 8.5) and optimum temperature (18˚C to 30˚C) [45] as observed in the study habitat. Desmidiaceae that numerically dominate the algal flora in waters from the sudanian and sahelian zones of Africa is similarly mentioned by authors such as Ouattara et al. [46] and Santi et al. [47]. Miozoa and Ochrophyta were less represented in the water body, reflecting their limited ecological adaptability. Their low abundance could suggest specific environmental sensitivities or a preference for niche habitats in the water body. The Shannon-Wiener diversity index highlighted significant differences between seasons and zones, suggesting complex interactions between microalgae and environmental factors [48]. High evenness values indicate that several microalgae species coexist in sampling zones. The specific richness of phytoplankton recorded in Samendeni Dam Lake was lower than that of Bagré Reservoir with 203 species, including 114 new species [49] and Loumbila Reservoir with 205 species [31]. That may be due to the characteristics of the Samendeni reservoir which is younger than the Bagré and the Loumbila reservoirs and less influenced by anthropogenic activities. Consequently, high water clarity and low nutrient content observed in the Samendeni Dam Lake conduct to lower species richness. According to Ravindra and Kaushik [50], nitrates and orthophosphates stimulate the proliferation of microalgae. Species abundance indicates a dominance of C. acutum in the dry season and O. geminatum in the rainy season. Additionally, some species of phytoplankton are exclusively present in different zones and adapted to specific ecological niches [51]. The shift from constant species dominance in the dry season to accessory species dominance highlights the strong influence of water quality on microalgae abundance [52]. The abundance and diversity of phytoplankton species were higher during the dry season, likely due to the seasonal shrinkage of the water body [53] [54]. Furthermore, while periphyton density peaks during the rainy season, it exhibits lower diversity. Periphyton communities tend to dominate in oligotrophic lakes due to their ability to access nutrients from their substrates [55]. In such nutrient-poor environments, the low density of phytoplankton allows ample light to reach the substrates, facilitating the growth of periphyton [56]. The abundance and diversity of microalgae in a hydro-agricultural dam lake have favorable characteristics for sustainable agricultural practices, such as promoting plant growth and enhancing soil quality [13] [57]. As listed in Table 3, Desmidiaceae, Euglenaceae and Cyanophyceae were recorded in the Samendeni Dam Lake. Indeed, the presence of Desmidiaceae species indicates oligotrophic habitats, whereas Euglenaceae species are particularly abundant in eutrophic habitats [24] [58]. Cyanophyta species can include potentially toxic species that can negatively impact animal health and aquatic life [59] [60]. The presence of some species from Euglenaceae such as Trachelomonas abrupta Svirenko, Trachelomonas lefevrei Deflandre, Trachelomonas volvocinopsis Svirenko and Cyanophyceae such as Oscillatoria geminatum Schwabe ex Gomont, Pseudanabaena catenata Lauterborn and Merismopedia elegans A. Braun ex Kützing, in the Dam Lake would indicate the beginning of degradation of the new impounded water body and the need to control its water quality.

4.3. Relationship between Microalgae and Water Parameters

Canonical correspondence analysis and redundancy analysis have revealed that the physico-chemical parameters strongly impact phytoplankton and periphyton communities in Samendeni Dam Lake. Figure 5 and Figure 6 show that a strong correlation of Chlorophyta species as well as Bacillariophyta species, Charophyta species, Cyanophyta species and Ochrophyta species were observed with pH, dissolved oxygen, electrical conductivity, transparency, nitrates, nitrites, ammonium nitrogen, orthophosphates. The strong correlation shows the ability of the species to adapt and grow under various physico-chemical conditions [7] [61]. Changes in water parameters inevitably impact the availability of species in freshwater ecosystems, serving as indicators of water quality [62]. According to Olele and Ekelemu [63], the sensitivity of species to electrical conductivity as observed with some Charophyta species in this study underscores their potential suitability as indicators of a good water quality and habitat conditions. Reynolds [64] reported that Charophyta and Bacillariophyta are oligotrophic indicators, while Cyanophyta and Euglenozoa are eutrophic indicators. In contrast, the presence of some Cyanophyta species (e.g., O. limosa, O. corallinae, M. elegans, M. glauca) and some Ochrophyta species (e.g., D. sertularia) indicate a nutrient-rich environments [31]. However, an increase in Cyanophyta abundance can have adverse effects, as some species can generate algal blooms and be harmful. This situation may be toxic to aquatic life and be unhealthy for human population [31]. An increase in the abundance of Cyanophyta is suggesting alterations in physico-chemical parameters, leading to a shift in microalgae populations, thereby influencing the overall ecological health and dynamics of water systems [65].

5. Conclusion

The presence of diversified species (96 species) related to the physico-chemical parameters of the Samendeni Dam Lake indicates the current situation of this new impounded system. It underscores the importance of continuous water quality monitoring, serving as a fundamental tool for habitat assessment. Charophyta is emerging as the dominant group, showcasing their remarkable adaptability to less polluted water. While pH, electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen, temperature, transparency, nitrates, nitrites, ammonium nitrogen and orthophosphates met acceptable thresholds, their variations across seasons highlight the nuanced nature of this recently established ecosystem. However, some Cyanophyta species can be potentially harmful species, indicating pollution of the water system. The presence of such species in a water body can serve as a cautionary reminder of the necessity for prudent management of the ecosystem and controlling algal proliferation. Therefore, efforts are essential for maintaining water quality, safeguarding biodiversity, and promoting sustainable agricultural practices, thereby preserving the delicate ecological balance of emerging freshwater environments.

Acknowledgements

We thank the following colleagues from Laboratoire de Recherche et de Formation en Pêche et Faune (LaRFPF), for their invaluable guidance and support throughout this work: Pr André Tinkoudgou Kabré and Dr Inoussa Compaoré. Their expertise and insights greatly enhanced the quality of this study. We acknowledge the help of all the fishermen of the Samendeni Dam Lake in obtaining relevant information for our study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1] Bennett, E.M. and Balvanera, P. (2007) The Future of Production Systems in a Globalized World. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5, 191-198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Tranvik, L.J., Downing, J.A., Cotner, J.B., Loiselle, S.A., Striegl, R.G., Ballatore, T.J., et al. (2009) Lakes and Reservoirs as Regulators of Carbon Cycling and Climate. Limnology and Oceanography, 54, 2298-2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Lavoie, I., Warwick, F.V., Reinhard, P. and Painchaud, J. (2005) Effet du débit sur la dynamique temporelle des algues périphytiques dans une rivière influencée par les activités agricoles. Revue des sciences de leau, 16, 55-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Groga, N. (2012) Structure, fonctionnement et dynamique du phytoplancton dans le lac de Taabo (Côte d’Ivoire). Ph.D. Dissertation, Université de Toulouse.
[5] Neya, B.A. (2018) Analyse du contrôle biologique des micro-algues toxiques et à fla-veur grâce à la prédation par Oreochromis niloticus et Sarotherodon galilaeus dans le lac de barrage de Ziga (Burkina Faso). Ph.D. Dissertation, Université Nazi BONI.
[6] Galvez-Cloutier, R., Ize, S. and Arsenault, S. (2002) La détérioration des plans d’eau: Manifestations et moyens de lutte contre l’eutrophisation. Vecteur Environnement, 35, 18-37.
[7] Zongo, F., Zongo, B., Boussim, J. and Coute, A. (2009) Nouveaux taxa de microalgues dulçaquicoles pour le Burkina Faso (Afrique de l’Ouest): I-Chlorophyta. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 2, 508-528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Sanogo, F., Kabore, F. and Kekele, A. (2023) Hydro-Agricultural Development, Integrated Water Resources Management in Climate Variability and Agricultural Migration Context in the Plandi 2 Sub-Watershed of Upper Mouhoun, Burkina Faso. International Journal of Geoinformatics and Geological Science, 10, 9-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Kabre, F.A., Sanogo, S., Compaore, I. and Zongo, B. (2023) Etude du broutage et du filtrage de la microflore algale par Heterotis niloticus (Cuvier, 1829) et biocontrôle de la qualité de l’eau du lac de barrage hydroagricole de Samendeni au Burkina Faso. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 17, 130-140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Bourrelly, P. (1990) Les algues d’eau douce: Initiation à la systématique. Tome I, Les algues vertes. Editions Boubée.
[11] WHO (2003) Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments. Coastal and Fresh Waters. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data.
[12] Renuka, N., Guldhe, A., Prasanna, R., Singh, P. and Bux, F. (2018) Microalgae as Multi-Functional Options in Modern Agriculture: Current Trends, Prospects and Challenges. Biotechnology Advances, 36, 1255-1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] González-Pérez, B.K., Rivas-Castillo, A.M., Valdez-Calderón, A. and Gayosso-Morales, M.A. (2021) Microalgae as Biostimulants: A New Approach in Agriculture. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 38, Article No. 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Ouedraogo, R.B., Sanogo, S. and Inoussa, C. (2024) Assessing the Exploitation Status of Sarotherodon Galilaeus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Samendéni Reservoir, Burkina Faso. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 28, 1509-1535.
[15] Kouanda, B., Coulibaly, P., Niang, D., Fowe, T., Karambiri, H. and Paturel, J.E. (2018) Analysis of the Performance of Base Flow Separation Methods Using Chemistry and Statistics in Sudano-Sahelian Watershed, Burkina Faso. Hydrology: Current Research, 9, Article 1000300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] APHA, AWWA and WEF (2017) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 23rd Edition, American Public Health Association.
[17] Niamien-Ebrottié, J.E. (2010) Composition et distribution spatio-temporelle des peuplements d’algues de quatre rivières du Sud-Est de la Côte d’Ivoire (Soumié, Eholié, Ehania et Noé). Ph.D. Dissertation, Université d’Abobo-Adjamé.
[18] Seu-Anoï, N.M. (2012) Structuration spatiale et saisonnière des peuplements phytoplanctoniques et variabilité des facteurs abiotiques dans trois complexes lagunaires de Côte d’Ivoire (Aby, Ébrié et Grand-Lahou). Ph.D. Dissertation, Université Nangui Abrogoua.
[19] Adon, M.P. (2013) Variation spatiale et saisonnière du phytoplancton de la retenue d’eau d’Adzopé (Côte d’Ivoire): Composition, structure, biomasse et production primaire. Ph.D. Dissertation, Université Nangui Abrogoua.
[20] Kouassi, B.A. (2013) Taxinomie, composition floristique et dynamique spatio-saisonnière des algues périphytiques de la retenue d’eau d’Adzopé (Côte d’Ivoire). Ph.D. Dissertation, Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny.
[21] Wehr, J.D. and Sheath, R.G. (2003) Freshwater Algae of North America: Ecology and Classification. Academic Press.
[22] Koffi, A.M. (2022) Qualité écologique de la lagune Aghien (Sud-Est de la Côte d’Ivoire): Suivi spatiotemporel et approches expérimentales des facteurs de régulation du phy-toplancton. Ph.D. Dissertation, Université Jean Lorougnon GUEDE.
[23] Guiry, M.D. and Guiry, G.M. (2024) AlgaeBase. World-Wide Electronic Publication, University of Galway.
https://www.algaebase.org/search/species/
[24] Zongo, B. and Boussim, J.I. (2015) The Effects of Physicochemical Variables and Tadpole Assemblages on Microalgal Communities in Freshwater Temporary Ponds through an Experimental Approach. Aquatic Biosystems, 11, Article No. 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Zongo, B., Zongo, F., Toguyeni, A. and Boussim, J.I. (2017) Water Quality in Forest and Village Ponds in Burkina Faso (Western Africa). Journal of Forestry Research, 28, 1039-1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Dajoz, R. (2000) Précis d’écologie. 7e edition, Editions DUNOD.
[27] Zongo, B., Zongo, F., Thiombiano, A. and Boussim, J.I. (2019) Phytoplankton Assemblages and Community Structure in Tropical Temporary Freshwater Ponds in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Phycology, 55, 789-800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Bancé, V., Ouéda, A., Kaboré, I., Zerbo, H. and Kabré, B.G. (2021) Ecological Status of a Newly Impounded Sub-Saharan Reservoir Based on Benthic Macroinvertebrates Community (Burkina Faso, West Africa). Journal of Ecology and The Natural Environment, 13, 1-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Duncan, A.E., Barnie, S., Osei-Marfo, M., Boateng, S.N., Acquaah, G. and Oboh, G. (2023) Water Quality Monitoring in the Pra Basin of Ghana. Open Access Library Journal, 10, e10173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] Ghazali, D. and Zaid, A. (2013) Etude de la qualité physico-chimique et bactériologique des eaux de la source Ain Salama-Jerri (Région de Meknes-Maroc). Larhyss Journal, 12, 22-36.
[31] Ouattara, M., Zongo, F. and Zongo, B. (2021) Species Diversity of Cyanobacteria and Desmids of a Drinking Water Source under Anthropogenic Pressure, and Their Implication in Toxin Production and Water Quality in Sub-Saharan Africa (Burkina Faso, Western Africa). Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 13, 1000-1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[32] Ouattara, Y., Guiguemde, I., Diendere, F., Diarra, J. and Bary, A. (2013) Pollution des eaux dans le bassin du nakambe: Cas du barrage de Ziga. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 6, 8034-8050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Attingli, A.H., Zinsou, L.H., Vissin, E.W. and Laleye, P.A. (2016) Spatialisation des paramètres physico-chimiques dans les pêcheries de la Basse Vallée de l’Ouémé (Sud-Bénin). Journal of Applied Biosciences, 105, 10190-10202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Sunardi, S. and Wiegleb, G. (1970) Review: Climate-Induced Hydrological Changes and the Ecology of Tropical Freshwater Biota. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 17, 322-331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] Kaboré, I., Ouéda, A., Moog, O., Meulenbroek, P., Tampo, L., Bancé, V., et al. (2022) A Benthic Invertebrates-Based Biotic Index to Assess the Ecological Status of West African Sahel Rivers, Burkina Faso. Journal of Environmental Management, 307, Article 114503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Bélanger, M., El-Jabi, N., Caissie, D., Ashkar, F. and Ribi, J.M. (2005) Estimation de la température de l’eau de rivière en utilisant les réseaux de neurones et la régression linéaire multiple. Revue des sciences de leau, 18, 403-421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] Oueda, A., Guenda, W., Kabre, A.T., Zongo, F. and Kabre, G.B. (2006) Diversity, Abundance and Seasonal Dynamic of Zooplankton Community in a South-Saharan Reservoir (Burkina Faso). Journal of Biological Sciences, 7, 1-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[38] Rodier, J., Legube, B., Merlet, N. and Brunet, R. (2009) L’Analyse de l’Eau. 9e edition, Editions Dunod.
[39] Greenop, B., Lovatt, K. and Robb, M. (2001) The Use of Artificial Oxygenation to Reduce Nutrient Availability in the Canning River, Western Australia. Water Science and Technology, 43, 133-144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Parparov, A. (2010) Water Quality Assessment, Trophic Classification and Water Resources Management. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2, 907-915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[41] Abagale, F.K., Yusif, H. and Abagale, S.A. (2020) Nutrient Concentration in Surface Water from Crop Lands in the Tolon District, Ghana. Asian Journal of Science and Technology, 11, 10985-10991.
[42] Cardoso-Mohedano, J., Canales-Delgadillo, J.C., Machain-Castillo, M., Sanchez-Muñoz, W., Sanchez-Cabeza, J., Esqueda-Lara, K., et al. (2022) Contrasting Nutrient Distributions during Dry and Rainy Seasons in Coastal Waters of the Southern Gulf of Mexico Driven by the Grijalva-Usumacinta River Discharges. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 178, Article 113584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Cook, S.C., Back, J.A. and King, R.S. (2022) Compensatory Dynamics of Lotic Algae Break down Nonlinearly with Increasing Nutrient Enrichment. Ecology, 103, e3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Proulx, F., Rodriguez, M.J., Sérodes, J.B. and Miranda, L.F. (2010) Factors Influencing Public Perception and Use of Municipal Drinking Water. Water Supply, 10, 472-485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[45] Pratiwi, N.T., Wardiatno, Y., WahyuAzizi, and Iswantari, A. (2019) Aufwuch Community on Association to Aquatic Plant in Lake Tempe, South Sulawesi. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 298, Article 012004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[46] Ouattara, A., Podoor, N., Teugels, G.G. and Gourene, G. (2000) Les Micro-algues de deux cours d’eau (Bia et Agnebi) de Cote d’Ivoire. Systematics and Geography of Plants, 70, 315-372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[47] Santi, S., Poda, B., Zongo, B. and Toguyeni, A. (2023) Comparative Study of Algal Community in African Sharptooth Catfish (Clarias gariepinus, Burchell 1822) and Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, Linnaeus 1758) Farming Ponds. Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries, 3, 149-164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[48] Hii, K.S., Mohd-Din, M., Luo, Z., Tan, S.N., Lim, Z.F., Lee, L.K., et al. (2021) Diverse Harmful Microalgal Community Assemblages in the Johor Strait and the Environmental Effects on Its Community Dynamics. Harmful Algae, 107, Article 102077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[49] Zongo, F., Zongo, B., Ouéda, A., Boussim, J.I. and Couté, A. (2007) Nouveaux taxa de micro-algues dulçaquicoles pour le Burkina Faso (Afrique de l’Ouest): II—Cyano-phyta, Heterokontophyta, Euglenophyta. Annales de lUniversité de Ouagadougou-Série C, 5, 51-78.
[50] Ravindra, K., Ameena, Meenakshi, Monika, Rani, and Kaushik, A. (2003) Seasonal Variations in Physico-Chemical Characteristics of River Yamuna in Haryana and Its Ecological Best-Designated Use. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 5, 419-426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[51] Alexander, T.J., Vonlanthen, P. and Seehausen, O. (2017) Does Eutrophication-Driven Evolution Change Aquatic Ecosystems? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372, Article 20160041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[52] Ndiritu, G.G., Gichuki, N.N., Kaur, P. and Triest, L. (2003) Characterization of Environmental Gradients Using Physico-Chemical Measurements and Diatom Densities in Nairobi River, Kenya. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 6, 343-354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[53] Arreghini, S., de Cabo, L., Seoane, R., Tomazin, N., Serafín, R. and de Iorio, A.F. (2005) Influence of Rainfall on the Discharge, Nutrient Concentrations and Loads of a Stream of the “Pampa Ondulada” (buenos Aires, Argentina). Limnetica, 24, 225-236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[54] Kabré, A.T. and Illé, A. (2000) Rétrécissement saisonnier des superficies d’eau, varia-tion physico-chimique et production des pêcheries artisanales de Bagré. Centre-Est Burkina Faso. Tropicultura, 18, 130-135.
[55] Wetzel, R.G. (2001) Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems. Third Edition, Academic Press.
[56] Vadeboncoeur, Y. and Steinman, A.D. (2002) Periphyton Function in Lake Ecosystems. The Scientific World Journal, 2, 1449-1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[57] Garcia-Gonzalez, J. and Sommerfeld, M. (2015) Biofertilizer and Biostimulant Properties of the Microalga Acutodesmus Dimorphus. Journal of Applied Phycology, 28, 1051-1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[58] Wehr, J.D., Sheath, R., Marcos, S. and Kociolek, P. (2015) Freshwater Algae of North America: Ecology and Classification. Academic Press.
[59] Altaf, H.G. and Saltanat, P. (2014) Effect of Physico-Chemical Conditions on the Structure and Composition of the Phytoplankton Community in Wular Lake at Lankrishipora, Kashmir. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 6, 71-84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[60] Glibert, P.M., Pitcher, G.C., Bernard, S. and Li, M. (2018) Advancements and Continuing Challenges of Emerging Technologies and Tools for Detecting Harmful Algal Blooms, Their Antecedent Conditions and Toxins, and Applications in Predictive Models. In: Glibert, P., Berdalet, E., Burford, M., Pitcher, G. and Zhou, M., Eds., Global Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algal Blooms, Springer International Publishing, 339-357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[61] Fužinato, S., Cvijan, M. and Stamenković, M. (2011) A Checklist of Desmids (Conjugatophyceae, Chlorophyta) of Serbia. II. Genus Cosmarium. Cryptogamie, Algologie, 32, 77-95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[62] Johnson, A.C., Acreman, M.C., Dunbar, M.J., Feist, S.W., Giacomello, A.M., Gozlan, R.E., et al. (2009) The British River of the Future: How Climate Change and Human Activity Might Affect Two Contrasting River Ecosystems in England. Science of The Total Environment, 407, 4787-4798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[63] Olele, N.F. and Ekelemu, J.K. (2008) Physicochemical and Periphyton/Phytoplankton Study of Onah Lake, Asaba, Nigeria. African Journal of General Agriculture, 4, 183-193.
[64] Reynolds, C.S. (2003) The Development of Perceptions of Aquatic Eutrophication and Its Control. International Journal of Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology, 3, 149-163.
[65] Hulyal, S.B. and Kaliwal, B.B. (2008) Dynamics of Phytoplankton in Relation to Physico-Chemical Factors of Almatti Reservoir of Bijapur District, Karnataka State. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 153, 45-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Copyright © 2025 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.