Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Isolated Bacteria from Otitis Media in Children at Mohamed Aden Sheikh Children Teaching Hospital in Hargeisa, Somaliland ()
1. Introduction
Otitis media is a group of inflammatory diseases of the middle ear [1]. Otitis media (OM) is a leading cause of health care visits and drugs prescription and its complications and sequelae are important causes of preventable hearing loss, particularly in developing countries [2]. Approximately 10% of children have an episode of AOM by three months of age and, by three years of age, approximately 50% to 85% of all children have experienced at least one AOM episode [3]. The two main types are acute otitis media (AOM) and otitis media with effusion (OME) [4]. Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is also another common type of otitis media. AOM is the rapid onset of signs and symptoms of inflammation in the middle ear [5]. Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media (CSOM) is a chronic inflammation of middle ear and mastoid cavity that may present with recurrent ear discharges (otorrhea) through a tympanic perforation [6]. One in four children will have an episode of AOM at some time during the first 10 years of life with a peak incidence of diagnosis occurring between the ages of three and six years [7].
AOM is characterized by irritability or feeding difficulties which may be the only indication of a septic focus whereby older children demonstrate a consistent presence of fever and otalgia, or ear tugging and hearing loss [8]. CSOM is characterized by chronic drainage from the middle ear associated with tympanic membrane (TM) perforation [9].
AOM is often caused by bacteria, but can also be caused by viruses. The bacterial species that usually cause AOM are Streptococcus pneumonia, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis [1]. In CSOM, the bacteria may be aerobic (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella species) or anaerobic such as Bacteroides, Peptostreptococcus, Proprionibacterium [10]. Viruses associated with AOM are respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), rhinoviruses, and adenoviruses [11]. However, the focus in this study will be the bacterial etiologies.
This study was guided by the quality improvement theory developed by Donabedian and Evidence-based practice (EBP) theory which has its roots in clinical epidemiology and evidence-based medicine (EBM). Donabedian defined quality care as that capable of maximizing the patient’s well-being and presented quality as a multidimensional concept and proposed the structure-process-outcome model of quality of care and which has been the basis for much work in healthcare quality since its original description in 1980 [12].
Donebedian’s theory was used because it entails quality of healthcare which is the ultimum area in which the study’s vision of improved quality of care is focused on. Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the conscientious and judicious use of current best evidence in conjunction with clinical expertise and patient values to guide health care decisions [13]. Practice guidelines are cited as potential tools for reducing the costs of health care, for enhancing quality assurance, and for improving medical education [14]. This study was also driven by this theory of EBP as the study aimed at improving the technical resources of the healthcare practitioners involved in the treatment of OM through generation of knowledge essential for developing standard treatment guideline for OM.
Antibiotic prescribing for otitis media should be guided by local data because research has shown there is a variation in etiologies among different geographical areas [15]. Likewise, the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of causative pathogens exhibit geographic variation [10]. However, antibiotic prescribing for otitis media in Somaliland is based on foreign data which cannot reflect the local etiological and antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Therefore, there was a significant research gap there for the study to fill.
This study was intended to help rational antibiotic prescribing, thus the fight against antibiotic resistance which is a national and global healthcare challenge. It is estimated that between 700,000 and several million people who suffer infectious diseases from resistant microbes die worldwide every year [16]. Very high rates of resistance have been observed in all WHO regions in common bacteria (for example, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus) that cause common health-care associated and community-acquired infections [17].
Studies conducted in different countries and regions had identified diverse bacterial pathogens of OM. A multinational study done on 917 children with OM in the US, Israel and Eastern Europe, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella were isolated from ear fluid cultures [18]. In Costa Rica, organisms isolated from 40 patients with CSOM in 1991 and 1992 included Pseudomonas spp. (41.9%), Gram-negative enterics (29%), Staphylococcus (9.8%), and others (9.8%) [19]. A study in Solomon Islands identified Proteus in 41%, Pseudomonas in 26%, Klebsiella in 16%, Escherichia coli in 9%, and S. aureus in 7% of patients who provided ear discharge samples [20].
A similar variation of etiologic bacteria of CSOM was also reported in similar studies conducted in Asia. Indian study reported that Staphylococcus aureus was the prevalent isolate followed by Proteus aeruginosa and Pseudomonas respectively [21]. In Nepal, identified Staphylococcus aureus as the most prevalent etiology followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella respectively [22]. Another study in Iraq reported that S. aureus and E. coli were the main isolates from ear cultures respectively [23].
Studies from different parts of Africa identified various bacterial pathogens as causative agents. Sudanese study observed that Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella with other coliforms were the commonest pathogens among investigated children 3 months to 15 years of age [24]. Nigerian study revealed that Pseudomonas to be the leading pathogen of OM followed by S. aureus and Proteus spp. respectively [25]. Studies in Ethiopia, [15] [26] reported that that Proteus spp. was the most common isolated pathogen (27.5%) followed by S. aureus (26.5%). A Moroccan study identified that Streptococcus pneumonia, Staphylococcus, E. coli, Klebsiella and Proteus as the main isolated bacteria in OM [27].
AOM may improve with antibiotics, but they are not always necessary since not all AOM is caused by bacteria [5]. Observation without use of antibacterial agents in a child with uncomplicated AOM is an option for selected children based on diagnostic certainty, age, illness severity, and assurance of follow-up [5]. For CSOM, There is no consensus agreement on its management and several treatment approaches are used including antibiotics and ear toilet (ear washing) with antiseptics such as Hydrogen Peroxide, Povide-Iodine and Normal Saline [28] and Mastoidectomy and/or tympanoplasty are frequently necessary to permanently cure CSOM [6]. A randomized clinical trial reported that toilet combined with antimicrobial treatment is more effective than aural toilet alone (OR = 0.31, 95% CL = 0.23, 0.43) and Oral antibiotics are better than aural toilet alone (OR = 0.35, 95% CL = 0.14, 0.87) [29]. Intravenous wide-spectrum antibiotic therapy in conjunction with daily suction and debridement is efficacious for the treatment of chronic suppurative otitis media without cholesteatoma compared to daily suction and debridement without antibiotics [30]. Topical ciprofloxacin drops were as effective as combined oral and topical ciprofloxacin and the addition of oral drug did not have any beneficial effect but increased cost of treatment [31]. Antibiotics will reduce the number of episodes of AOM per year from around three to around 1.5 [32]. Mastoidectomy and/or tympanoplasty are frequently necessary to permanently cure CSOM [6].
Otitis media is highly prevalent in children living in Hargeisa. However, currently no studies are available conducted in Hargeisa to investigate on the etiologic bacteria and its antibiotic susceptibility patterns to allow evidence-based treatment approaches for otitis media Therefore, this study aimed to identify the etiologic bacteria and antibiotic susceptibilities to guide local healthcare professionals and practice guidelines as well in the effective therapeutic management of otitis media in children in Hargeisa city and in Somaliland in general.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Area, Design and Population
The study was cross-sectional by design, retrospective data collected and conducted at a tertiary pediatric teaching hospital in Hargeisa, the capital city of Somaliland. The hospital was selected because it’s the largest referral pediatric hospital in the country serving in patients and outpatients from Hargeisa and those referred from other regions and districts in Somaliland as well as from neighboring Puntland and Somalia.
The study population screening criteria were all children between the age range of 0 to 14 years who presented to the hospital with ear discharge with subsequent confirmed diagnosis by hospital physician and ear swab was collected. Children with otitis media but ear swab and culture were not done were not eligible and excluded. The study participants were randomly selected from the 8017 OM cases of children less than 15 years of age who presented to the hospital with otitis media with ear discharge between 1st March 2013 to 20th May, 2017.
2.2. Sample Size and Sample Size Determination
The sample size was calculated using Yamane (1967) sample size calculation formula [33]. 95% confidence level and a margin of error (α) of 5% were considered. The formula was stated as: n = N ÷ {1 + N(e2)}, where: n = the sample size
N = the population size (No. of patients treated at the hospital with OM).
e = the acceptable sampling error at 95% confidence level and p = 0.05 are assumed
On substitution n = 8017 ÷ {1+ [8017(0.052)]} = 8017 ÷ 21.0425 = 381.
However, it was not possible to reach the target 381 sample size due to the retrospective nature of the study as well as the unavailability of the ear discharge culture and sensitivity laboratory data in the hospital electronic database (medical records) and only 270 reports were found comprising of 70.8% of the target sample size which was acceptable enough to achieve external validity (sample representativeness of the target population).
2.3. Isolation and Identification of Bacteria
Secondary retrospective data were collected from the patients’ medical records (electronic hospital database-Open Hospital) to isolate micro-organisms from the ear swab cultures. Ear swabs were originally collected from participants by hospital physicians and sent to Hargeisa Group Hospital Laboratory, the National Referral Hospital, for culture and sensitivity testing. The medical laboratory used standard microbiological and biochemical procedures for bacterial identification. The samples were inoculated onto blood chocolate and MaCconkey agar plates and incubated at 37˚C overnight. The gram stain was performed as well as standard biochemical tests including catalase, oxidase, urease, coagulase, and indole tests.
2.4. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing
To determine the in vitro antibiotic susceptibility of the isolated bacterial species from ear discharge samples, the microbiology laboratory used disk diffusion method according to the performance standards for susceptibility testing by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute [34].
2.5. Data Analysis
Data were entered and analyzed using the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Epi Info™ “version 7.2.” software and any associations among the study variables tested with Chi2 test with confidence level of 95% and p value of < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
2.6. Ethical Considerations
The ethical clearance of the study was given by the Ethical Committee of the School of Postgraduate Studies and Research of Amoud University. Moreover, official permission to conduct the study at the site and participation was obtained from the Ethical Committee and Management of Mohamed Aden Sheikh Children Teaching Hospital prior to the study commencement. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, it was not possible to obtain consent from the parents and guardians of the children who participated the study. However, the parents and guardians provided verbal consent for ear swab collection for microbiological analysis previously to the hospital though this was for medical reasons only.
3. Results
Out of the total 270 participants, 158 (58.52%) were males and 112 (41.48%) were females as presented in Figure 1. As described in Figure 2, 34.4% aged between 0 - 3 years followed by the age groups 4 - 7, 8 - 11 and 12 - 15 years constituting 29.3%, 27.8% and 8.5% respectively. The prevalence of ear samples providing positive cultures were 96.3% while in 3.7% of them, no bacterial growth was observed. The predominant bacterial isolate was S. aureus (31.48%) followed by P. aeruginosa (24.81%) and P. mirabilis (15.93%). The least prevalent isolates were Coagulase negative Staphylococcus (1.48%), S. pyogenes (0.74%) and Enterobacter spp. (0.37%) respectively as shown in Table 1.
The predominant bacterial isolates for females were S. aureus (38.39%), P. aeruginosa (19.64) and P. mirabilis (14.29) respectively while the least isolated species were CoNS, S. pyogenes and S. pneumoniae (0.89%) each as presented in Table 2. For male participants, the frequent bacterial isolate was P. aeruginosa (28.48) in contrast to the female participants followed by S. aureus (26.58) and P. mirabilis (17.9%) respectively (Table 2). There was no significant relationship between bacterial isolate and gender, χ2 (11,270 = 9.2283, p = 0.6008) (Table 3). Table 4 shows the distribution of isolated bacteria by age groups in which the predominant age group was (0 - 3 years). There was a significant relationship between the isolate distribution and this age group 0 - 3 (χ2 (143,270 = 223.245, p = 0.000) as shown in Table 5.
Figure 1. Sample distribution by gender.
Figure 2. Sample distribution by age.
Table 1. Isolate distribution by frequency and percentage.
Isolate |
Frequency |
Percent (%) |
Cum. Percent |
CoNS |
4 |
1.48 |
1.48 |
E. coli |
15 |
5.56 |
7.04 |
Enterobacter spp. |
1 |
0.37 |
7.41 |
Klebsiella pneumoniae |
6 |
2.22 |
9.63 |
no growth |
10 |
3.70 |
13.33 |
P. aeruginosa |
67 |
24.81 |
38.15 |
P. vulgaris |
25 |
9.26 |
47.41 |
P. mirabilis |
43 |
15.93 |
63.33 |
Proteus spp. |
7 |
2.59 |
65.93 |
S. aureus |
85 |
31.48 |
97.41 |
S. pyogenes |
2 |
0.74 |
98.15 |
S. pneumoniae |
5 |
1.85 |
100.00 |
Total |
270 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
CoNs coagulase negative Staphylococci.
Table 2. Isolate distribution by gender.
Gender |
CoNS |
E. coli |
Enterobacter spp. |
Klebsiella pneumoniae |
no growth |
P. aeruginosa |
P. vulgaris |
P. mirabilis |
Proteus spp. |
S. aureus |
S. pyogenes |
S. pneumoniae |
Total |
Female |
1 (0.89) |
7 (6.25) |
1 (0.89) |
2 (1.79) |
4 (3.57) |
22 (19.64) |
10 (8.93) |
16 (14.29) |
4 (3.57) |
43 (38.39) |
1 (0.89) |
1 (0.89) |
112 |
Male |
3 (1.9) |
8 (5.06) |
0 (0) |
4 (2.53) |
6 (3.8) |
45 (28.48) |
15 (9.49) |
27 (17.9) |
3 (1.9) |
42 (26.58) |
1 (0.89) |
4 (0.63) |
158 |
Total |
4 (1.48) |
15 (5.56) |
1 (0.37) |
6 (2.22) |
10 (3.7) |
67 (24.81) |
25 (9.26) |
43 (15.93) |
7 (2.59) |
85 (31.48) |
2 (0.74) |
5 (1.85) |
270 |
CoNS Coagulase negative Staphylococcus.
Table 3. Summary of Χ2 test of isolate distribution by gender.
Variable |
N |
df |
χ2 |
Sig. |
Decision |
Isolate distribution |
270 |
11 |
9.2283 |
0.6008 |
Accept Ho |
Table 4. Isolate Distribution by Age.
Age |
CoNS |
E. coli |
Enterobacter spp. |
Klebsiella pneumoniae |
no growth |
P. aeruginosa |
P. vulgaris |
P. mirabilis |
proteus spp. |
S. aureus |
S. pyogenes |
S. pneumoniae |
Total |
P-Value |
0 - 3 |
3 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
18 |
8 |
14 |
1 |
32 |
2 |
2 |
93 |
0.000 |
4 - 7 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
22 |
6 |
15 |
1 |
28 |
0 |
0 |
79 |
|
8 - 11 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
20 |
9 |
13 |
4 |
20 |
0 |
3 |
75 |
|
12 - 15 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
|
Total |
4 |
15 |
1 |
6 |
10 |
67 |
25 |
43 |
7 |
85 |
2 |
5 |
270 |
|
Table 5. Summary of χ2 test of isolate distribution by age and hypothesis testing.
Variable |
N |
df |
χ2 |
Sig. |
Decision |
Isolate distribution |
270 |
143 |
223.245 |
0.000 |
Reject Ho |
S. aureus, the predominant isolate, showed highest sensitivity towards the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin (85.7%), the aminoglycosides; amikacin (76.5%), and gentamicin (73.8%) respectively and chloramphenicol (75.6%). Highest resistance rates were observed towards the penicillins; oxacillin (94.1%), penicillin (88%), ampicillin (75%) and amoxiclav (66.7%) as well as sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (67.9%). P. aeruginosa, the second most prevalent isolated bacteria, was highly sensitive to ciprofloxacin (92.3%), followed by doxycycline (92.3%), gentamicin (87.8%) and amikacin (83.8%) respectively and highly resistant to nitrofurantoin and erythromycin (100%) both, and followed in the order of resistance by ampicillin (96.6%), amoxiclav (88.5%) and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (84.8%) as illustrated in Table 6.
Overall, the most efficacious antibiotics to the total isolates were gentamicin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone while least effective drugs were
Table 6. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of isolated bacteria.
|
|
Susceptibility Patterns of Bacterial Isolates by Frequency (Percent) |
Isolate |
|
CN |
AMK |
CIP |
SXT |
CAF |
T |
DO |
AML |
P |
CRO |
E |
AMC |
S. aureus |
S |
31 (73.8) |
13 (76.5) |
24 (85.7) |
17 (32.1) |
31 (75.6) |
29 (58.0) |
13 (72.2) |
3 (25.0) |
3 (12.0) |
8 (57.1) |
41 (68.3) |
3 (33.3) |
R |
11 (26.2) |
4 (23.5) |
4 (14.3) |
36 (67.9) |
10 (24.4) |
21 (42.0) |
5 (27.8) |
9 (75.0) |
22 (88.0) |
6 (42.9) |
19 (31.7) |
6 (66.7) |
P. aeruginosa |
S |
36 (87.8) |
15 (83.3) |
36 (92.3) |
5 (15.2) |
6 (21.4) |
7 (24.1) |
12 (92.3) |
1 (3.4) |
0 (0) |
10 (58.8) |
0 (0) |
3 (11.5) |
R |
5 (12.2) |
3 (16.7) |
3 (7.7) |
28 (84.8) |
22 (78.6) |
22 (75.9) |
1 (7.7) |
28 (96.6) |
4 (100) |
7 (41.2) |
1 (100) |
23 (88.5) |
P. mirabilis |
S |
17 (81.0) |
5 (71.4) |
23 (92.0) |
13 (39.4) |
5 (25.0) |
2 (8.0) |
0 (0.0) |
5 (22.7) |
0 (0.0) |
17 (85.0) |
0 (0.0) |
6 (40.0) |
R |
4 (19.0) |
2 (28.6) |
2 (8.0) |
20 (60.6) |
15 (75.0) |
23 (92.0) |
3 (100.0) |
17 (77.3) |
5 (100.0) |
3 (15.0) |
2 (100.0) |
9 (60.0) |
P. vulgaris |
S |
12 (70.6) |
4 (80.0) |
10 (90.9) |
4 (28.6) |
4 (25.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (12.5) |
0 (0.0) |
9 (90.0) |
0 (0.0) |
2 (16.7) |
|
R |
5 (29.4) |
1 (20.0) |
1 (9.1) |
10 (71.4) |
12 (75.0) |
15 (100.0) |
4 (100.0) |
7 (87.5) |
2 (100.0) |
1 (10.0) |
1 (100.0) |
10 (83.3) |
CoNS |
S |
1 (50.0) |
0 (0) |
2 (100.0) |
1 (100.0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (33.3) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.00 |
0 (0.0) |
1 (50.0) |
1 (100.0) |
0 (0.0) |
R |
1 (50.0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
2 (100.0) |
2 (66.7) |
1 (100.0) |
2 (100.0) |
1 (100.0) |
1 (50.0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (100.0) |
E. coli |
S |
3 (50.0) |
5 (100.0) |
9 (69.2) |
2 (28.6) |
2 (40.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0) |
3 (60.0) |
1 (50.0) |
1 (12.5) |
R |
3 (50.0) |
0 (0.0) |
4 (30.8) |
5 (71.4) |
3 (60.0) |
9 (100.0) |
3 (100.0) |
7 (100.0) |
0 (0) |
2 (40.0) |
1 (50.0) |
7 (87.5) |
Enterobacter spp. |
S |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
1 (100.0) |
0 (0) |
1 (100.0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0) |
1 (100.0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0.0) |
R |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0) |
1 (100.0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0) |
1 (100.0) |
Klebsiella pneumoniae |
S |
1 (50.0) |
0 (0) |
1 (100.0) |
2 (33.3) |
2 (50.0) |
1 (20.0) |
0 (0) |
0 (100.0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (100.0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0.0) |
R |
1 (50.0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0.0) |
4 (66.7) |
2 (50.0) |
4 (80.0) |
0 (0) |
5 (100.0) |
1 (100.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0) |
5 (100.0) |
Proteus spp. |
S |
2 (100.0) |
4 (100.0) |
4 (66.7) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0) |
4 (100.0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (100.0) |
R |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
2 (33.3) |
4 (100.0) |
1 (100.0) |
2 (100.0) |
2 (100.0) |
5 (100.0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
S. pyogenes |
S |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (50.0) |
1 (50.0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
1 (50.0) |
0 (0) |
2 (100.0) |
0 (0.0) |
R |
1 (100.0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
2 (100.0) |
1 (50.0) |
1 (50.0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0) |
1 (50.0) |
0 (0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (100.0) |
S. pneumoniae |
S |
3 (100.0) |
2 (100.0) |
2 (100.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (33.3) |
1 (50.0) |
0 (0) |
1 (50.0) |
2 (100.0) |
2 (100.0) |
0 (0.0) |
R |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
3 (100.0) |
2 (100.0) |
2 (66.7) |
1 (50.0) |
0 (0) |
1 (50.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (100.0) |
CoNS: coagulate negative Staphylococci, AMK: Amikacin, AMC: Amoxicillin clavulanic acid, CRO: Ceftriaxone, CN: Gentamicin; DO: Doxycycline, CIP: Ciprofloxacin, SXT: Trimethoprim-Sulphamethoxazole, E: Erythromycin, T: Tetracycline, AML: Ampicillin, and P Penicillin; S: sensitive, R: resistant.
tetracycline, ampicillin, penicillin, erythromycin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and amoxiclav.
4. Discussion
In this study, the culture positive samples were 96.3% which was close to that observed by [15] and higher than those reported by other researchers [35] [36]. The majority of cases in the study were under five children in line with findings of [15] [26]. This could be attributed to the anatomy of the Eustachian tube, which is horizontal, wide and short especially in children with these features enabling advantage to pathogens to mount from the nasopharynx to the middle ear cavity [37].
The most prevalent bacterial isolate in this study was S. aureus which is in agreement with studies [22] [38] [39] [40]. In contrast, studies [36] [41] [42] [43] [44] reported P. aeruginosa as the predominant bacterial isolate while [15] [26] observed Proteus spp. as the main bacterial isolates. In agreement with this study’s findings, [45] and [46] reported P. aeruginosa and S. aureus as the most dominant causes of OM.
There was no significant association between bacterial isolate and gender in this study (χ2 (11,270 = 9.2283, p = 0.6008), χc2 = 19.675 > χo2 = 9.2283) as reported by [43] [47]. On the contrary, others have found that there was an association between gender and otitis media [15] [48] [49] [50]. In addition, a significant relationship was found between number of isolates and age group (0 - 3) (p = 0.000). This is in close agreement with a study done in Ethiopia which reported the highest bacterial isolates found in age group 0 - 5 (p = 0.02) [40]. Similar result was observed by other studies in Ethiopia [15] and [26].
In the present study, the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates varied among different antibiotics tested. S. aureus, the most prevalent isolate, was 85.7% sensitive to ciprofloxacin, the drug exhibited most effective antibacterial activity which is in agreement with the report of [44] and in contrast to that of [15] [40] and [42]. S. aureus was sensitive to gentamicin (73.8%) in this study as reported also by [15] [35] [36] [38] and [39] demonstrated high resistance to penicillin (88%), ampicillin (75%) and amoxiclav (66.7%). This pattern of S. aureus resistance pattern correlates with the findings of [27]. In this study, 31.7% of the S. aureus isolates were resistant to erythromycin which is very close to the findings of [15] and [40] which observed 39% and 31.5% of the isolates being resistant respectively.
P. aeruginosa, the second most prevalent isolated bacteria, was highly sensitive to ciprofloxacin (92.3%). Similar finding has been reported by [36] [44]. Contrastingly, less P. aeruginosa sensitivity pattern to ciprofloxacin had been reported by [27] [35] [40]. Proteus mirabilis showed multiple drug resistant patterns with 100% resistance to doxycycline, penicillin and erythromycin as similarly observed by [36] [40].
The most efficacious antibiotics to the total isolates were gentamicin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin. This agreed with the results of [40]. The two proteus species were the most resistant bacteria to many antibiotics tested. All isolates showed highest resistance rates to tetracyclines, ampicillin, penicillin, erythromycin and amoxiclav.
5. Conclusion
S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and Proteus mirabilis were the leading causative pathogens of otitis media. No association was established between isolate distribution and gender. Both the isolated gram positive and gram negative bacteria showed greatest sensitivity towards ciprofloxacin while the highest resistance was observed to penicillins, tetracyclines and sulfonamides. S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and P. mirabilis remain the major etiologic bacteria of OM among children in Hargeisa which could effectively be treated with topical and systemic flouroquinolones, aminoglycosides and 3rd gen. cephalosporins.
6. Limitations
It was not possible to reach the target 381 sample sizes due to the retrospective nature of the study as well as the unavailability of the ear discharge culture and sensitivity laboratory data in the hospital electronic database (medical records) and only 270 reports were found comprising of 70.8% of the target sample size.