Fekete-Szegö Estimate for a Class of Starlike Functions Involving Certain Analytic Multiplier Transform ()
1. Introduction
For the normalized analytic function f of the form:
(1)
in the unit disk
, Fekete and Szegö [1], proved that,
(2)
And for the Schwarzian derivative
given by
Simple calculation shows that the coefficient functional
is related to the Schwarzian derivative by
on normalized analytic functions f in the unit disk. Kanas and Darwish [2]
remarked that, when
, becomes
, where
denotes the Schwarzian derivative given in Equation (3) and that if we consider the nth root transformation
of the function in Equation (1), then
and
, so that
where
. Several authors have discussed the nature of
for the normalized univalent functions in the unit disk. This is known as Fekkete-Szegö problem. Several authors have discussed the nature of
for classes of normalized univalent functions in the unit disk and this is known as Fekkete-Szegö problem. For example, Choi, Kim and Sugawa [3], gave a generalized prestarlike function, while in [4] Fekete-Szegö problem was solved using subordination principle. Moreover, in [5] [6] [7] [8] and [9] Fekete-Szegö problems were solved for class of close-to-convex functions. Authors in [10] [11] [12] and [13] also solved Fekete-Szegö for classes of normalized analytic functions.
Now, we denote by S, the set of all functions of the form (1) that are normalized analytic and univalent in the unit disk
. Let
be the classes of starlike and convex univalent function of order
, of the form:
Now, we denote by S, the set of all functions of the form (1) that are normalized analytic and univalent in the unit disk
. Let
be the classes of starlike and convex univalent function of order
, of the form:
(4)
Several authors have generalized notions of
-starlikeness and
-convexity onto a complex order
see [14] [15] [16]. When
in Equations (4) and (5), the starlike, respectively, convex functions with respect to the origin are obtained. With the aid of Ruscheweyh derivative, Kumar et al. [17] introduced the class
of functions
as follows:
Definition 1 Let b be a nonzero complex number, and let f be a univalent function of the form (1) such that
for
. We say that f belongs to
if
(5)
Moreover, the author in [18] defined a linear transformation
by
(6)
where
.
Motivated by the work of Kanas and Darwish, using the subclass of Kumar et al, involving the linear transformation in Equation (6), we study the coefficient estimates and solved the Fekete-Szegö problem for the subclass
involving the linear transformation
.
Definition 2 Let b be a nonzero complex number, and f a univalent function of the form (1) such that
for
. We say that f belongs to
if
(7)
where
is as given in Equation (6).
The following results shall be employed in the proof of the main results of this study.
Lemma 1 [19] Let P be the class of analytic functions in U with
, Re
and of the form
(8)
then
If
, then
with
. Conversely, if
for some
, then
and
. Furthermore, we have
If
and
, then
, where
and
,
. Conversely, if
for some
and
, then
,
and
.
In what follows, we give the statement and proof of the results of this study.
2. Coefficient Estimates for...
Theorem 1 Let
and b a non-zero complex number. If f of the form (1) is in
, then
and
Proof 1 Let
, then by definition 2, there exist a class of analytic function p given by
satisfying
and
such that
(9)
where
From Equation (9), we have:
(10)
Equating coefficients in Equation (10) using Equation (6) with
, we have
(11)
(12)
(13)
From Equations (12) and (13) using Equation (6), we have,
(14)
respectively
(15)
On the account of Equations (14) and (15) using Lemma 1, we have
and
which proves theorem 1.
3. The Fekete-Szegö Problem for the Subclasses
Theorem 2 Let b be a nonzero complex number and
. Then
, the following holds.
Proof 2 From Equations (14) and (15), we have
where
and
.
Applying Lemma 1 to the above last inequality, we obtain
(16)
This proves the theorem.
Theorem 3 Let b be a nonzero complex number and
. Then
, the following holds.
(17)
where
.
Proof 3 Let
. From Equation (17), we have
Now, using the above calculations with
, we have
and conclusively, let
, then
This concludes the proof of the theorem 3.
4. Conclusions
The result in this paper extends the work of Kanas and Darwish as it is evident
that for
and
,
in the first part, respectively second part of the theorem 1 yields the first part respectively second part
of the theorem 2.2 for
in Kanas and Darwish. Moreover when
and
in Equation (6), the result in this study gives finer initial coefficient estimates and bound for Fekete-Szegö problem.
It will also be interesting to check the effect of the linear transformation given in (6) on other subclasses of normalized analytic functions.