Share This Article:

Quantifying the Effects of Climate Change and Land Management on Vegetation Dynamics from 1982 to 1985 in the Source Region of Three-Rivers, China

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:3770KB) PP. 54-68
DOI: 10.4236/gep.2019.711005    71 Downloads   156 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment


Vegetation dynamics under a warming climate in the source region of the Three Rivers (SRTR) and its ecological impacts are a source of serious concern. In this study, we investigated the spatial and temporal variations of normalized difference vegetation index during the growing season (NDVIgr) and the start of the vegetation growing season (SOS) for six ecosystems. We examined the relationships between vegetation parameters, air temperature, precipitation and land management using residual trend method from 1982 to 2015. The NDVIgr increased at a rate of 0.0061/10a, and SOS advanced by 0.96 d/10a during the study period. The NDVIgr increased for the all six vegetation ecosystem from 1982 to 2015. The SOS showed advancing trend for the vegetation types for meadow (0.1236 d/a) and steppe (0.3480 d/a), but showing delaying trends for forest, shrub, barren land and alpine vegetation. The results of the correlation analysis indicate an increase in the air temperature in the SRTR is the main factor explaining increases in the NDVI and advancement of the SOS. In general, awarming-wetting climate and reasonable human activities had positive effects on vegetation growth, while the positive impact of human activities was weaker than that of climatic factors. This study provides a necessary basis for research on and the prediction of vegetation changes and their response to the climate warming of the SRTR in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP).

1. Introduction

The Yellow River, Yangtze River and Lantsang River originate in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), which is a cold and arid region with a fragile ecosystem (Wang et al., 2017) . Because of the high altitude and climate of the QTP, frozen ground is widespread, and alpine grasslands are the primary vegetation type. In a warming climate, the increasing rate of temperature in the QTP is obviously greater than that in other regions of the world in recent decades (Yang et al., 2010; Qin et al., 2016) . This trend has been shown to invoke dramatic influence on the structure and function of terrestrial ecosystem in the source region of three-river (SRTR) (Grimm et al., 2013; Fu et al., 2019) .

It is hypothesized that the climate warming may result in alpine grassland degradation, including the reduction in vegetation cover, decrease in the number of plant families, reverse succession of alpine grasslands and release of organic carbon (Yi et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2015) . Many previous studies have suggested that temperature increases and frozen ground degradation lower the ground water table and dry out surface soils, leading to the degradation of vegetation, which supports the above hypothesis (Wang et al., 1994; Wang et al., 2010) . However, some studies have reported that pronounced soil temperatures combined with the degradation of frozen grounds may promote vegetation growth in cold regions (Myneni et al., 1997; Zhong et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2011) . These studies have stressed that the increase in temperature may mitigate the low-temperature stress of alpine vegetation and promote the nutrient cycle (Zhou et al., 2015) . Clearly, it remains unclear whether a warming climate has positive or negative effects on vegetation growth.

Vegetation phenology is not only a sensitive indicator of global climate change but also provide feedback to climate through changes in biogeochemical cycling and biophysical properties (Kim et al., 2012) . It has been suggested that longer growing seasons, particularly earlier spring vegetation green-up, significantly enhance vegetation productivity in the temperate and boreal regions (Song et al., 2011) . However, previous researches regarding the trend of SOS during the last few decades on the plateau remain controversial. For example, Piao et al. (2007) have reported a continuous advancement in SOS on the Tibetan Plateau during 1982-2011, whereas others have argued that there is no evidence to prove such a conclusion (Oliva et al., 2018) . Zhang et al., (2015) assumed that the SOS delaying trend due to low temperature in winter for plant dormancy could not be sufficient as the significant increase in temperature of winter.

Temperature and precipitation were considered as the two principal climatic factors causing variations in vegetation (Pang et al., 2017) . Non-climatic drivers referring to land management mainly include grazing, ecological programs, natural hazards and engineering infrastructure, which may have significant impacts on plant productivity and community structure (Pan et al., 2017; Sheng et al., 2019) . However, few studies have distinguished the effects of climate change and non-climatic factors on vegetation growth, particularly to compare these differences in these effects across different land cover and vegetation types.

In this study, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), which is derived from the Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spector radiometer (MODIS), was used to characterize changes in vegetation over time, and to examine the correlation with climatic variation and land management. The objectives of our study were to 1) investigate the spatial and temporal patterns of growing season vegetation NDVI (from May to September) (NDVIgr) and SOS in SRTR during the past 34 years; 2) analyze the vegetation growth among different land covers; 3) distinguish the effects climatic and non-climatic factors on NDVI and SOS changes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The SRTR is a catchment area of approximately 33.95 × 104 km2 located in northeastern QTP, and its spatial range covers 31˚39' - 36˚12'N, 89˚45' - 102˚23'E (Figure 1). The altitude decreases from west to east and south to north, ranging from 6824 m in the Animaqin Mountains to 2575 m in the village of Tangnaga. The SRTR has a typical continental plateau climate that is affected by the Asian monsoon, with an average annual air temperature of −5.6˚C to −7.8˚C and an average annual precipitation of 260 - 780 mm. The SRTR is characterized as a transition zone from permafrost to seasonally frozen soils at midlatitudes and high altitudes of the QTP.

2.2. Data

The measured meteorological data in this study from 45 meteorological stations located in and near the SRTR (Figure 1) were collected from the National Meteorological Information Center ( These data include monthly air temperature and precipitation, spanning the period 1982-2015.

Figure 1. The general geographic map of the study area and the meteorological sites.

The NDVI derived from GIMMS and MODIS was used to understand vegetation growth. GIMMS NDVI data are represented in a 15-d maximum-value composite product, with a spatial resolution of 8 km during the period 1982-2006. The MODIS NDVI data are collected every 16 d at a 1-km spatial resolution from 2002 to 2015. To ensure consistency in the two NDVI datasets, we applied a linear fit between the two datasets using an overlapping data period (2000-2006) and applied this relationship (Song et al., 2011) to the MODIS NDVI data to extend the temporal sequence of the GIMMS NDVI data. Additionally, we preprocessed the datasets by implementing an image cut, projection transformation (to WGS-84) and image resampling (to 8 km). The above two datasets were subjected to radiometric calibration, atmospheric correction, cloud screening, and solar zenith angle correction to remove the effects unassociated with variations in vegetation.

The land cover map (MICLCover2000), with a 1-km spatial resolution, for the year 2000 used the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) classification (Figure 2). The MICLCover2000 datasets were downloaded from the Cold and Arid Regions Science Data Center at Lanzhou (

2.3. Retrieving the Vegetation Green-up Date

The GIMMS and MODIS NDVI data were used to determine the vegetation green-up date (i.e., the start of the vegetation growing season (SOS)) in the SRTR. Time series of NDVI data were smoothed using the asymmetric Gaussian function fitting method via the TIMESET software version 3.2 (Jönsson & Eklundh, 2004) . This fitting method, which is combined with the Gaussian function, simulates the vegetation growth process by stage and then connects and smooths the fitted curves in different stages to reestablish the NDVI time series.

Figure 2. Land cover types in the SRTR.

The SOS was determined by the relative threshold method from the NDVI time series. The dates of the SOS were defined by the times when the NDVI values increased to a certain proportion of the seasonal amplitude along the left edge of the annual curve. A relative threshold of 10% was used based on previous suggestions and results obtained in similar environments (Song et al., 2011) .

2.4. Trend and Correlation Analyses

The t-test was adopted to analyze the interannual trends of the NDVIgr, SOS, precipitation and temperature, and to examine the significance of these trends. The computational formula (Zhang et al., 2016) is:

θ Slope = n × j = 1 n ( j × x j ) ( j = 1 n j ) ( j = 1 n x j ) n × ( j = 1 n j ) 2 ( j = 1 n j ) 2 (1)

where n represents the number of years in the study period, which was n = 34 (1982-2015) in this study; Xj represents the quantity being studied in year j; and θ represents the slope of the trend line (when θ > 0, the quantity being studied increases over n years, and vice versa).

The correlation coefficients were calculated in each pixel in order to analyze the relationship between vegetation factors and climatic factors. The computational formula (Xu et al., 2011) is:

r x y = i = 1 n ( x i x ¯ ) ( y i y ¯ ) i = 1 n ( x i x ¯ ) 2 i = 1 n ( y i y ¯ ) 2 (2)

To quantitatively determine how non-climatic factors impact vegetation growth, the residual trend analysis (Pan et al., 2017) was used in this study. The residuals represented the differences between simulated and observed NDVI. The multivariate linear regression was adopted to simulate NDVI considering factors including SFD, air temperature and precipitation on NDVI. All data were processed with the assistance of ArcGIS 10.5 software and MATLAB 2015a software.

3. Results

3.1. Spatial and Temporal Variations in NDVI, SOS, Temperature and Precipitation

Figure 3 demonstrated the spatial distributions of the mean NDVIgr, SOS, air temperature and precipitation over the 34 year in SRTR. The average vegetation NDVIgr from 1982 to 2015 was 0.2911 and gradually decreased from southeast to northeast with increasing altitudes (Figure 3(a)). The SOS date ranged from 122d to 164d, with the mean value of 143d, occurring at the end of April (Figure 3(b)). As NDVIgr, annual distribution of average temperature and precipitation varied greatly spatially, with highest value (−4.81˚C and 126.17 mm, respectively)

Figure 3. Spatial distribution of the mean NDVIgr (a), SOS (b), air temperature (c) and precipitation (d) during 1982-2015.

in southeast region and the lowest value in northeast region (4.72˚C and 708.57 mm, respectively).

Temporal variations of the mean NDVIgr, SOS, air temperature and precipitation from 1982 to 2015 were shown in Figure 4. The NDVI in the SRTR exhibited a generally increasing trend at the 34-year time scale (Figure 4(a)), with a rate of increase of 0.0061/10 a. The most significant increase in the NDVI for the SRTR occurred in the source region of the Yellow River which located in the eastern SRTR. The SOS showed a significant advancing trend across the entire SRTR (0.096 d/a) (Figure 4(b)). The SOS in eastern and western region showed a rapid advancing trend, whereas the central SRTR showed a delay in the SOS. At the same time scale, both the annual mean air temperature and precipitation showed increasing trends at the rates of 0.057˚C/a and 2.604 mm/a, respectively.

3.2. Vegetation Dynamics of Different Vegetation Types

The trends in the NDVIgr and SOS for six types of vegetation in the SRTR are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6, respectively. The growing season NDVI increased for the all six vegetation types from 1982 to 2012, with the increasing rates of 0.0033/a, 0.0023/a, 0.0026/a, 0.0026/a, 0.0022/a and 0.0018/a in forest, shrub, steppe, meadow, barren land and alpine vegetation, respectively. The average vegetation SOS showed an advancing trend for the vegetation types for meadow (0.1236 d/a) and steppe (0.3480 d/a), which were the principal plant communities in SRTR. But such advancing trends were not observed for forest,

Figure 4. Spatial distribution of NDVIgr (a), SOS (b), air temperature (c) and precipitation (d) from 1982 to 2015.

Figure 5. Trends of mean NDVIgr of forest (a), shrub (b), steppe (c), meadow (d), barren land (e), and alpine vegetation (f) from 1982 to 2015.

Figure 6. Trends of mean SOS of forest (a), shrub (b), steppe (c), meadow (d), barren land (e), and alpine vegetation (f) from 1982 to 2015.

shrub, barren land and alpine vegetation, and the shrub showed the greatest delay trend (0.2450 d/a).

3.3. Effect of Climatic and Non-Climatic Factors on Vegetation

We calculated the correlation coefficients between vegetation factors (NDVIgr and SOS) and climatic factors (air temperature and precipitation) and (Table 1). It was found that the correlation coefficients between the NDVIgr and climatic factors were significantly positive, especially for vegetation type of steppe. However, the SOS for entire study area and the six vegetation communities showed a lower correlation with temperature and precipitation. In addition, compared with the precipitation, the increasing air temperature had greater effects on the NDVIgr for all six vegetation types. However, the impacts of increasing temperature on SOS were more complex, and the correlation coefficients between SOS and temperature were greater for forest and shrub at the 0.05 level of significance.

To further quantify the influences of climatic and non-climatic factors on the variation in vegetation activity, the contribution of each driving factor to the interannual variation in the NDVI in the regions during 1982-2015 was analyzed and compared (Figure 7). The average contributions of temperature, precipitation and non-climatic factors to the NDVI across the SRTR were positive, which were 0.0044/a, 0.0031/a and 0.0025/a, respectively. Temperature was found to have strong positive effects on the majority of both regions but have negative effects in the north and south region. In general, precipitation has weaker effects on the NDVI than temperature, and has a negative effect on the NDVI in part

Table 1. The correlation coefficients between influencing factors and vegetation factors.

Note: (*) and (**) are significant at a level of 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.

Figure 7. Contributions of air temperature (a), precipitation (b), and non-climatic factors (c) to NDVIgr variations during 1982-2014.

area of south region. The non-climatic factors have a greater effect on the variation in the NDVI in the east than in the west of the study area.

4. Discussion

This study made an effort to investigate variations in the annual mean NDVIgr and SOS in the SRTR from 1982 to 2015. Our results indicated that the NDVI during the growing season showed an increase from 1982 to 2015, which was consistent with previous reports on the source region in the QTP (Xu et al., 2011; Luo et al., 2018) but contrary to some earlier studies (Zhang et al., 2007) . Different selections of study areas and time intervals can result in different conclusions. The SRTR had better eco-environmental quality than the other regions in QTP, mainly because the Chinese government has established a nature reserve and introduced numerous ecological restoration programs in this area since 2000 to protect this ecosystem (Shen et al., 2018) . The results from previous vegetation studies before 2003 were different from those after 2003 (Zhang et al., 2016) . Liang et al. (2012) reported that in 2000-2007, variations in the NDVI based on MODIS satellite data experienced an overall increase of approximately 5%, which supported our results to a certain extent. This study showed that the average SOS in the SRTR has advanced by 0.096 d/a, which is consistent with previous reports from the QTP (Yu et al., 2018) .

There is no doubt that vegetation growth depends upon an appropriate hydrothermal condition (Xu et al., 2011) . Several previous studies found that vegetation variations and green-up dates for the Tibetan Plateau were associated with precipitation (Zhong et al., 2010) . Other studies showed that vegetation dynamics and phenological changes were positively influenced by increased temperatures (Wang et al., 2016) . Our study indicated that the temperature made a greater effect on the NDVIgr comparing with precipitation, which was in line with the latter one. Climate warming could mitigate low-temperature stress, promote the nutrient cycle in cold regions and, therefore, play a positive role in the enhancement of vegetation (Zhou et al., 2015) . Moreover, some researchers have generally assumed that permafrost degradation increases soil permeability, decreases the water table and dries out shallow soils, thereby negatively influencing vegetation growth on the QTP (Wang et al., 2019) .

In addition, the responses of vegetation to climate change are different according to the climate and vegetation type in the study area. Wang et al. (2010) found that the vegetation growth of alpine meadows mainly distributed across seasonally frozen soil areas was mainly limited by the soil temperature of the QTP, while that of alpine steppes (mainly found in seasonally frozen soils) was limited by both soil temperature and soil water. Zhou et al. (2015) found that in very cold permafrost regions, warming mitigated energy limitations on vegetation growth for both semiarid and semihumid basins; in warm permafrost regions, warming exacerbated the limitations of water on vegetation growth in semiarid basins but still favored vegetation growth in semihumid basins. In other words, under different conditions (heat-limited or water-limited), the vegetation of plateaus responds differently (Karnieli et al., 2006) . In our study, the NDVIgr of all the vegetation types showed an increasing trend, and the SOS of meadow and steppe exhibited the advancing trend. The differences were due mainly to the selection of study period and method.

In this study, non-climatic factors referring to land management made a positive impact on vegetation growth in most parts of SRTR for the entire period of 1982-2015. Previous studies indicated that non-climatic factors made a negative contribution to vegetation distribution and ecosystem structure due to overgrazing and rodent damage in SRTR before 2000. Since 2000, when the implementation of ecological restoration projects began, the negative influence of land management on vegetation was reversed (Pan et al., 2017) . Therefore, the positive contributions of land management after 2000 may offset the negative effects before 2000. Moreover, the contribution of non-climatic factors was greater in the east than in the west of the study area, possibly because the population was more in the east with lower elevation and thereby human activities were more intense.

5. Conclusion

Based on vegetation NDVI and meteorological datasets, we investigated the spatial and temporal changes in NDVIgr and SOS in the SRTR over the past 34 years, and their responses to climate change were analyzed and discussed. The main findings were as follows: 1) At the regional scale, the average NDVIgr and SOS gradually decreased and increased from southeast to northeast with increasing altitudes, with the mean values of 0.2911 and 143d, respectively. From 1982 to 2015, the mean NDVIgr and SOS showed the increasing and advancing trends of 0.0061/10a and 0.096 d/a, respectively. 2) The growing season NDVI increased for the all six vegetation types from 1982 to 2012. The average vegetation SOS showed advancing trend for the vegetation types for meadow (0.1236 d/a) and steppe (0.3480 d/a), but showing delaying trends for forest, shrub, barren land and alpine vegetation. 3) The relationship between climatic factors and NDVIgr for entire region and six vegetation types were greater than with SOS. The contribution of temperature on vegetation growth was greater than precipitation and non-climatic factors. Except for the climatic factors and human activities, other driving forces (e.g. frozen soil, wind and evapotranspiration) also play an important role in vegetation dynamics. Therefore, we will further study the different factors on vegetation growth and quantify their effects.


The research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.41807061), Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (No.2018M633454) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (No.GK201803046).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Wang, R. and Ma, H. (2019) Quantifying the Effects of Climate Change and Land Management on Vegetation Dynamics from 1982 to 1985 in the Source Region of Three-Rivers, China. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 7, 54-68. doi: 10.4236/gep.2019.711005.


[1] Fu, G., Zhang, H. R., & Sun, W. (2019). Response of Plant Production to Growing/ Non-Growing Season Asymmetric Warming in an Alpine Meadow of the Northern Tibetan Plateau. Science of The Total Environment, 650, 2666-2673.
[2] Grimm, N. B., Chapin, F. S., Bierwagen, B. et al (2013). The Impacts of Climate Change on Ecosystem Structure and Function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11, 474-482.
[3] Jönsson, P., & Eklundh, L. (2004). TIMESAT—A Program for Analyzing Time-Series of Satellite Sensor Data. Computers & Geosciences, 30, 833-845.
[4] Karnieli, A., Bayasgalan, M., Bayarjargal, Y., Agam, N., Khudulmur, S., & Tucker, C. J. (2006). Comments on the Use of the Vegetation Health Index over Mongolia. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27, 2017-2024.
[5] Kim, Y., Kimball, J. S., Zhang, K., & McDonald, K. C. (2012). Satellite Detection of Increasing Northern Hemisphere Non-Frozen Seasons from 1979 to 2008: Implications for Regional Vegetation Growth. Remote Sensing of Environment, 121, 472-487.
[6] Liang, S. H., Ge, S. M., Wan, L., & Xu, D. W. (2012). Characteristics and Causes of Vegetation Variation in the Source Regions of the Yellow River, China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 33, 1529-1542.
[7] Luo, L. H., Ma, W., Zhuang, Y. L. et al. (2018). The Impacts of Climate Change and Human Activities on Alpine Vegetation and Permafrost in the Qinghai-Tibet Engineering Corridor. Ecological Indicators, 93, 24-35.
[8] Myneni, R. B., Keeling, C. D., Tucker, C. J., Asrar, G., & Nemani, R. (1997). Increased Plant Growth in the Northern High Latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature, 386, 698-702.
[9] Oliva, M., Pereira, P., & Antoniades, D. (2018). The Environmental Consequences of Permafrost Degradation in a Changing Climate. Science of the Total Environment, 616-617, 435-437.
[10] Pan, T., Zou, X. T., Liu, Y. J., Wu, S. H., & He, G. M. (2017). Contributions of Climatic and Non-Climatic Drivers to Grassland Variations on the Tibetan Plateau. Ecological Engineering, 108, 307-317.
[11] Pang, G. J., Wang, X. J., & Yang, M. X. (2017). Using the NDVI to Identify Variations in, and Responses of, Vegetation to Climate Change on the Tibetan Plateau from 1982 to 2012. Quaternary International, 444, 87-96.
[12] Piao, S. L., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Viovy, N., & Demarty, J. (2007). Growing Season Extension and Its Impact on Terrestrial Carbon Cycle in the Northern Hemisphere over the Past 2 Decades. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 21, GB3018.
[13] Qin, Y., Lei, H. M., Yang, D. W., Gao, B., Wang, Y. H., Cong, Z. T., & Fan, W. J. (2016). Long-Term Change in the Depth of Seasonally Frozen Ground and Its Ecohydrological Impacts in the Qilian Mountains, Northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Hydrology, 542, 204-221.
[14] Shen, X. J., An, R., Feng, L. et al. (2018). Vegetation Changes in the Three-River Headwaters Region of the Tibetan Plateau of China. Ecological Indicators, 93, 804-812.
[15] Sheng, W. P., Zhen, L., Xiao, Y., & Hu, Y. F. (2019). Ecological and Socioeconomic Effects of Ecological Restoration in China’s Three Rivers Source Region. Science of the Total Environment, 650, 2307-2313.
[16] Song, C. Q., Ke, L. H., You, S. C., Liu, G. H., & Zhong, X. K. (2011). Comparison of Three NDVI Time-Series Fitting Methods Based on TIMESAT—Taking the Grassland in Northern Tibet as Case. Remote Sensing Technology & Application, 26, 147-155.
[17] Wang, B. L., & French, H. M. (1994) Climate Controls and High-Altitude Permafrost, Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau, China. Permafrost & Periglacial Processes, 5, 87-100.
[18] Wang, G. X., Liu, L. A., Liu, G. S., Hu, H. C., & Li, T. B. (2010). Impacts of Grassland Vegetation Cover on the Active-Layer Thermal Regime, Northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Permafrost & Periglacial Processes, 21, 335-344.
[19] Wang, R., Zhu, Q. K., Ma, H., & Ai, N. (2017). Spatial-Temporal Variations in Near-Surface Soil Freeze-Thaw Cycles in the Source Region of the Yellow River during the Period 2002-2011 Based on the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for the Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) Data. Journal of Arid Land, 9, 850-864.
[20] Wang, T. Y., Wu, T. H., Wang, P., Li, R., Xie, C. W., & Zou, D. F. (2019). Spatial Distribution and Changes of Permafrost on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Revealed by Statistical Models during the Period of 1980 to 2010. Science of the Total Environment, 650, 661-670.
[21] Wang, X. Y., Yi, S. H., Wu, Q. B., Yang, K., & Ding, Y. J. (2016). The Role of Permafrost and Soil Water in Distribution of Alpine Grassland and Its NDVI Dynamics on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Global and Planetary Change, 147, 40-53.
[22] Xu, W. X., Gu, S., Zhao, X. Q., Xiao, J. S., Tang, Y. H., Fang, J. Y., Zhang, J., & Jiang, S. (2011). High Positive Correlation between Soil Temperature and NDVI from 1982 to 2006 in Alpine Meadow of the Three-River Source Region on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations & Geoinformation, 13, 528-535.
[23] Yang, M., Nelson, F. E., Shiklomanov, N. I., Guo, D. L., & Wan, G. N. (2010). Permafrost Degradation and Its Environmental Effects on the Tibetan Plateau: A Review of Recent Research. Earth Science Reviews, 103, 31-44.
[24] Yi, S. H., Zhou, Z. Y., Ren, S. L., Xu, M., Qin, Y., Chen, S. Y., & Ye, B. S. (2011). Effects of Permafrost Degradation on Alpine Grassland in a Semi-Arid Basin on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Environmental Research Letters, 6, 45403-45409.
[25] Yu, S., Xia, J. J., Yan, Z. W., & Yang, K. (2018). Changing Spring Phenology Dates in the Three-Rivers Headwater Region of the Tibetan Plateau during 1960-2013. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 35, 116-126.
[26] Zhang, J. H., Yao, F. M., Zheng, L. Y., & Yang, L. M. (2007). Evaluation of Grassland Dynamics in the Northern-Tibet Plateau of China Using Remote Sensing and Climate Data. Sensors, 7, 3312-3328.
[27] Zhang, W. J., Yi, Y. H., Kimball, J. S., Kim, Y. W., & Song, K. C. (2015) Climatic Controls on Spring Onset of the Tibetan Plateau Grasslands from 1982 to 2008. Remote Sensing, 7, 16607-16622.
[28] Zhang, Y., Zhang, C. B., Wang, Z. Q., Chen, Y. Z., Gang, C. C., An, R., & Li, J. C. (2016). Vegetation Dynamics and Its Driving Forces from Climate Change and Human Activities in the Three-River Source Region, China from 1982 to 2012. Science of the Total Environment, 563, 210-220.
[29] Zhong, L., Ma, Y. M., Salama, M. S., & Su, Z. B. (2010). Assessment of Vegetation Dynamics and Their Response to Variations in Precipitation and Temperature in the Tibetan Plateau. Climatic Change, 103, 519-535.
[30] Zhou, Z. Y., Yi, S. H., Chen, J. J., Ye, B. S., Sheng, Y., Wang, G. X., & Ding, Y. J. (2015). Responses of Alpine Grassland to Climate Warming and Permafrost Thawing in Two Basins with Different Precipitation Regimes on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateaus. Arctic Antarctic & Alpine Research, 47, 125-131.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.