Temperature-Programmed Reduction and Dispersive X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Studies of CeO2-Based Nanopowders for Intermediate-Temperature Solid-Oxide Fuel Cell Anodes
Marina S. Bellora1,2, Joaquín Sacanell2,3*, Cristián Huck-Iriart1, Analía L. Soldati3, Susana A. Larrondo4,5, Diego G. Lamas1
1CONICET/Laboratorio de Cristalografía Aplicada, Escuela de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional de General San Martín, San Martín, Argentina.
2Departamento de Física de la Materia Condensada, Gerencia de Investigación y Aplicaciones, Centro Atómico Constituyentes, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, San Martín, Argentina.
3Instituto de Nanociencia y Nanotecnología (INN), CNEA-CONICET, San Martín and San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina.
4UNIDEF-CONICET-MINDEF, Departamento de Investigaciones en Sólidos, CITEDEF, Villa Martelli, Argentina.
5Instituto de Investigación e Ingeniería Ambiental, Universidad Nacional de General San Martín, San Martín, Argentina.
DOI: 10.4236/msa.2019.1010045   PDF    HTML   XML   318 Downloads   760 Views   Citations


In this work, we study the influence of the average crystallite size and dopant oxide on the reducibility of CeO2-based nanomaterials. Samples were prepared from commercial Gd2O3-, Sm2O3- and Y2O3-doped CeO2 powders by calcination at different temperatures ranging between 400°C and 900°C and characterized by X-ray powder diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and BET specific surface area. The reducibility of the samples was analyzed by temperature-programmed reduction and in situ dispersive X-ray absorption spectroscopy techniques. Our results clearly demonstrate that samples treated at lower temperatures, of smallest average crystallite size and highest specific surface areas, exhibit the best performance, while Gd2O3-doped ceria materials display higher reducibility than Sm2O3- and Y2O3-doped CeO2.

Share and Cite:

Bellora, M. , Sacanell, J. , Huck-Iriart, C. , Soldati, A. , Larrondo, S. and Lamas, D. (2019) Temperature-Programmed Reduction and Dispersive X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Studies of CeO2-Based Nanopowders for Intermediate-Temperature Solid-Oxide Fuel Cell Anodes. Materials Sciences and Applications, 10, 631-642. doi: 10.4236/msa.2019.1010045.

1. Introduction

Cerium oxide (CeO2) has been studied for many years and it is still the focus of great attention due its wide range of possible applications. It is used in three-way catalysts (TWCs) for the elimination of toxic auto-exhaust gases [1] [2] low-temperature water-gas shift (WGS) reaction [3] [4], oxygen sensors [5] [6], oxygen permeation membrane systems [7] [8] and solid-oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) [9] [10] [11] [12], among others.

In all the aforementioned applications, there is a growing interest in the study of nanostructured materials, in which an improved surface-to-volume ratio can be obtained. This interest is founded in the consequent substantial reduction in the energy for defect formation occurs in nanocrystalline CeO2, that leads to a high degree of non-stoichiometry and electronic carrier generation [13] both beneficial for redox, catalytic and transport properties. For example, CeO2-based nanoceramics exhibit enhanced ionic conductivity [14], which is very important for their application as SOFC electrolytes.

Although the benefit of the use of nanostructured materials has already been pointed out by several authors, the studies of this type of materials from the basic point of view to understand the mechanisms underlying the different processes of catalysis are scarce. In recent years, our research groups have investigated CeO2-based and NiO/CeO2-based catalysts by dispersive X-ray absorption spectroscopy (DXAS) under different atmospheres and reaction conditions [15] [16] [17] [18]. Samples with different morphologies were analyzed, finding that CeO2-based materials with small average crystallite size and high specific surface area exhibit the best properties, reaching high reducibility and excellent methane conversion for intermediate temperatures [19].

In this work, we analyzed the redox behavior of nanocrystalline Gd2O3, Sm2O3 and Y2O3-doped CeO2 (GDC, SDC and YDC, respectively) powders. We used conventional laboratory temperature programmed reduction (TPR) and combined those results with an in-situ DXAS study under diluted hydrogen atmosphere, in order to gain further insight on the redox properties of the systems. The samples were treated at different temperatures, between 400˚C and 900˚C to analyze the influence of the crystallite size.

2. Experimental Procedure

Samples were prepared from nanocrystalline commercial (Nextech Materials) Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9 (GDC), CeO2-10 mol% Sm2O3 (Ce0.82Sm0.18O1.91, SDC) and CeO2-10 mol% Y2O3 (Ce0.82Y0.18O1.91, YDC) powders. They were calcined at 400˚C, 650˚C and 900˚C in order to study the influence of the average crystallite size.

X-ray powder diffraction (XPD) was performed in a Brucker D8 Discover DaVinci diffractometer (Institute of Physics, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil) operated with Cu-Kα radiation at 40 kV and 30 mA, a Ni filter and a Lynx-eye detector, in Bragg-Brentano configuration. Experimental data were collected in the angular 2θ range of 20˚ - 140˚ with a step size of 0.02˚ and a time per step of 1 s. The average crystallite sizes of the crystalline phases were determined for all the samples using the Scherrer equation.

Specific surface area was evaluated by means of N2-physisorption with a Quantachrome Corporation Autosorb-1 equipment. Samples were previously degassed with pure He at 90˚C during 12 h. Results were obtained using the five-point Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) experiments were performed using a Philips CM 200 UT microscope operated at 200 kV. The microscope was equipped with ultratwin objective lens and an EDAX spectrometer for chemical analysis by EDS. Powdered samples were suspended in isopropyl alcohol, ultrasonicated for 2 minutes and deposited in Cu/ultrathin hollow carbon TEM grids (Ted Pella).

Hydrogen temperature programmed reduction (TPR) experiments were performed in a Micromeritics Chemisorb 2720 equipment to study sample reducibility. The mass employed for each experiment was of 80 mg. Prior to TPR tests, samples were pretreated in He at 300˚C during 30 min to remove any adsorbed species on the solid surface. TPR was carried out with a 50 cm3 (STP) min−1 (5 vol.% H2/Ar) flow from room temperature up to 800˚C following a heating ramp of 10˚C min−1. Hydrogen uptake was estimated using a Thermal Conductivity Detector (TCD) previously calibrated.

Dispersive X-ray absorption spectroscopy (DAXS) study was performed at the D06A-DXAS dispersive beamline of the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS, Campinas, Brazil). A Si (111) monochromator was used altogether with a CCD detector to collect the absorption spectrum in transmission mode. Self-supporting discs were prepared by mixing the sample powder with boron nitride that has no significant absorption in the energy ranges used. The catalyst mass in the discs was calculated in order to obtain a total absorption ratio of 1.5. Sample discs were located in a sample-holder with a thermocouple attached to it. The sample holder was placed in a quartz reactor, with inlet and outlet gas lines, and located in a furnace with temperature control. Inlet gas composition was set with a gas-mixing station provided with mass flow controllers and exit composition was assessed with a Pfeiffer Omnistar mass spectrometer.

We followed the evolution of DXAS spectra as function of temperature at the L3-edge of Ce under diluted H2(5% in He), in order to determine the Ce3+/ Ce4+ proportion. The temperature range was of 400˚C - 800˚C. CeO2 and Ce(NO3)3∙6H2O were also measured as standards. Ce3+/Ce4+ proportion was obtained by means of linear least square procedures using Python scripting.

3. Results and Discussion

X-ray diffraction patterns for the samples calcined at 400˚C are presented in Figure 1. All of them display the expected fluorite-type crystal structure with no sign of any impurity. The nanostructured character of the powders is evidenced by their wide Bragg peaks.

Samples of the three compounds were treated at different temperatures, in order to obtain powders with different particle sizes. Figure 2 displays the X-ray

Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns for all compounds treated at 400˚C.

Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns for YDC powders compounds treated at 400˚C, 650˚C and 900˚C.

diffraction patterns for YDC nanopowders treated at 400˚C, 650˚C and 900˚C. As expected, the broadening of Bragg peaks decreases for increasing calcination temperature because samples treated at higher temperatures are formed by larger crystallites. The average crystallite sizes (D) determined from the Scherrer equation for all samples are summarized in Table 1. Crystallite sizes range from around 5 to ~50 nm. In particular, the SDC sample treated at 900˚C, is formed by crystallite significantly larger than GDC and YDC samples calcined at the same temperature.

Figure 3 displays selected TEM images taken from several samples treated at 650˚C. From those images, it can be observed that particle sizes are of the same order of magnitude of crystallite sizes (Table 1), thus indicating that particles

Table 1. Average crystallite size in nm determined using Scherrer equation for all the samples studied in this work.

Figure 3. TEM images of the samples calcined at 650˚C: (a) GDC, (b) SDC, (c) YDC.

are single crystals. This feature was also observed for samples treated at 400˚C and for samples treated at 900˚C, as exemplified in Figure 4 for the SDC system. From the morphological point of view, it can be seen that the particles display polygonal shapes in samples treated at higher temperatures.

The dependence of the average crystallite size as a function of calcination temperature is presented in Figure 5, where it can be seen that crystallite growth is less significant in GDC and YDC compared to SDC. In any case, in undoped ceria the effect is more prominent than that observed in the present work [20] [21]. This is a consequence of the inhibition produced by the solute drag model due to a space charge effect [22]. Y2O3 is known as one of the most efficient inhibitors of grain boundary mobility [20], here we show that Gd2O3 has a very similar effect.

The values of BET specific surface area of the samples are summarized in Table 2. As it can be observed in Figure 5, there is a marked correlation between SSA and average crystallite size, showing inverse trends for increasing calcination temperature.

The temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) profiles of samples calcined at

Figure 4. TEM images for the SDC samples treated at (a) 400˚C, (b) 650˚C, (c) 900˚C.

Figure 5. Average crystallite size and BET specific surface area as functions of calcination temperature.

Table 2. BET specific surface area in m2/g for all samples.

650˚C are shown in Figure 6. The TPR signal, directly related with hydrogen consumption, is presented as a function of the temperature of the sample. The

Figure 6. (a) TPR profile and (b) hydrogen consumption, for samples calcined at 650˚C.

curves do not present the same shape, position and height of the maximum. It is clearly observed that the main peak for all samples is close to 500˚C, while a secondary peak is detected around 770˚C. The main peak corresponding to the GDC sample, notably occurs at a lower temperature than those corresponding to YDC and SDC, indicating that the first is more efficient for hydrogen oxidation than the other two. Besides, SDC sample is slightly better than YDC one considering their reducibility, in view of the lower temperature at which hydrogen consumption is triggered. No significant difference is observed between the secondary peak of the three samples. The same trend was observed for samples treated at 400˚C and 900˚C. In Figure 6(b) we show the hydrogen consumption as a function of temperature in which the overall picture is clarified. Indeed, hydrogen consumption of GDC triggers at significantly lower temperature and is higher in the whole temperature range, than that corresponding to SDC and YDC, which are both very similar.

We also studied the influence of the average crystallite size on the reducibility of the samples. Figure 7(a) displays the TPR profiles for the YDC system as an example. It can be observed that the temperature of the main peak decreases with increasing calcination temperature, thus indicating that samples of lower

Figure 7. (a) TPR profiles and (b) hydrogen consumption for YDC samples.

average crystallite size are more efficient than those with larger particles. The same overall trend is observed for the other two systems (not shown). Regarding hydrogen consumption (Figure 7(b)), it can be noticed that it is enhanced in the sample treated at 400˚C, confirming again the enhanced reducibility of samples with smallest crystallites.

The above results regarding the influence of crystallite size and dopant oxide on the reducibility of the samples were further confirmed by using the DXAS technique under diluted H2 atmosphere (5 mol% H2/He). The experimental procedure was designed in order to mimic the conditions of the laboratory TPR experiments. For example, DXAS data taken at the Ce L3-edge for the SDC nanopowder calcined at 400˚C is shown in Figure 8, displaying the evolution as a function of temperature. At room temperature, two peaks characteristic of Ce4+ are detected, while one peak corresponding to Ce3+ becomes more prominent at high temperatures. By measuring DXAS data corresponding to Ce3+ and Ce4+ standards and using a linear combination procedure, it was possible to determine the Ce3+ fraction as a function of temperature for all the samples.

Figure 9 displays the Ce3+ fraction (αCe3+) as a function of temperature for GDC, SDC and YDC samples treated at 400˚C (Figure 8(a)) and 650˚C (Figure 8(b)). As it can be observed that the largest values of αCe3+ were exhibited by

Figure 8. DXAS data at the Ce L3-edge collected upon heating under 5 mol% H2/He up to 600˚C for SDC nanopowder calcined at 400˚C.

Figure 9. Ce3+ fraction (αCe3+) for the GDC, SDC and YDC samples, treated at (a) 400˚C and (b) 650˚C, obtained from DXAS analysis.

GDC for both sets samples (calcined at 400˚C and 650˚C), clearly indicates its higher reducibility compared to SDC and YDC systems, in excellent agreement with TPR results.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we analyzed by the effect of average crystallite size and dopant oxide on the reducibility of CeO2-based nanopowders by temperature-programmed reduction and dispersive X-ray absorption spectroscopy techniques.

We obtained samples formed by single-crystalline particles of controlled grain size, ranging between 4 to around 50 nm of diameter. The addition of Gd2O3 or Y2O3 has shown to inhibit grain growth more efficiently than Sm2O3.

Our results obtained from combined TPR and in situ DXAS, evidenced that:

- Gd2O3-doped ceria display better reducibility than Y2O3- and Sm2O3-doped ceria.

- Reducibility is enhanced in the samples formed by small sized crystallites.

Even though all the materials studied in this work exhibited good properties and, therefore, are likely to be used as anodes of intermediate-temperature SOFCs, Gd2O3-doped CeO2 nanopowders presented the best performance and are more promising for applications.


The present work was partially supported by the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS, Brazil, proposals DXAS-10900, XAFS1-13662 and XAFS1-15360), Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (Argentina, PICT 2015 No. 3411 and PICT 2016 No. 1921) and CAPES-MinCyT bilateral cooperation. The authors thank Prof. Márcia Fantini for her help during X-ray powder diffraction and DXAS measurements and for her valuable comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


[1] Trovarelli, (1996) Catalytic Properties of Ceria and CeO2-Containing Materials. Catalysis Reviews, 38, 439-520.
[2] Kaspar, J., Fornasiero, P. and Graziani, M. (1999) Use of CeO2-Based Oxides in the Three-Way Catalysis. Catalysis Today, 2, 285-298.
[3] Fu, Q., Weber, A. and Flytzani-Stephanopoulo, M. (2001) Nanostructured Au-CeO2 Catalysts for Low-Temperature Water-Gas Shift. Catalysis Letters, 77, 87-95.
[4] Fu, Q., Saltsburg, H. and Flytzani-Stephanopoulo, M. (2003) Active Nonmetallic Au and Pt Species on Ceria-Based Water-Gas Shift Catalysts. Science, 301, 935-938.
[5] Beie, H.J. and Gnörich, A. (1991) Oxygen Gas Sensors Based on CeO2 Thick and Thin Films. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 4, 393-399.
[6] Jasinski, P., Suzuki, T. and Anderson, H.U. (2003) Nanocrystalline Undoped Ceria Oxygen Sensor. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 95, 73-77.
[7] Stoukides, M. (2000) Solid-Electrolyte Membrane Reactors: Current Experience and Future Outlook. Catalysis Reviews, 42, 1-70.
[8] Yin, X., Hong, L. and Liu, Z.L. (2006) Oxygen Permeation through the LSCO-80/ CeO2 Asymmetric Tubular Membrane Reactor. Journal of Membrane Science, 268, 2-12.
[9] Steele, C.H. (2000) Appraisal of Ce1yGdyO2-y/2 Electrolytes for ITSOFC Operation at 500 °C. Solid State Ionics, 129, 95-110.
[10] Park, S.D., Vohs, J.M. and Gorte, R.J. (2000) Direct Oxidation of Hydrocarbons in a Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Nature, 404, 265-267.
[11] Sun, W., Hui, R. and Roller, J. (2010) Cathode Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: A Review. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 14, 1125-1144.
[12] Sun, W. and Stimming, U. (2007) Recent Anode Advances in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Journal of Power Sources, 171, 247-260.
[13] Tuller, H.L. (2000) Ionic Conduction in Nanocrystalline Materials. Solid State Ionics, 131, 143-157.
[14] Bellino, M.G., Lamas, D.G. and Walsöe de Reca, N.E. (2006) Enhanced Ionic Conductivity in Nanostructured, Heavily Doped Ceria Ceramics. Advanced Functional Materials, 16, 107-113.
[15] Zimicz, M.G., Larrondo, S.A., Prado, R.J. and Lamas, D.G. (2012) Time-Resolved in Situ XANES Study of the Redox Properties of Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 Mixed Oxides. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37, 14881-14886.
[16] Zimicz, M.G., Prado, F.D., Soldati, A.L., Lamas, D.G. and Larrondo, S.A. (2015) XPD and XANES Studies of Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 Nanocatalysts under Redox and Catalytic CH4 Oxidation Conditions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 119, 19210-19217.
[17] Zimicz, M.G., Prado, F.D., Lamas, D.G. and Larrondo, S.A. (2017) In-Situ XANES and XPD Studies of NiO/Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 IT-SOFCs Anode Nanomaterial as Catalyst in the CPOM Reaction. Applied Catalysis A: General, 542, 296-305.
[18] Toscani, L.M., Zimicz, M.G., Martins, T.S., Lamas, D.G. and Larrondo, S.A. (2018) In Situ X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Study of CuO-NiO/CeO2-ZrO2 Oxides: Redox Characterization and Its Effect in Catalytic Performance for Partial Oxidation of Methane. RSC Advances, 8, 12190-12203.
[19] Bacani, R., Toscani, L.M., Martins, T.S., Fantini, M.C.A., Lamas, D.G. and Larrondo, S.A. (2017) Synthesis and Characterization of Mesoporous NiO2/ZrO2-CeO2 Catalysts for Total Methane Conversion. Ceramics International, 43, 7851-7860.
[20] Chen, P.-L. and Chen, I.W. (1996) Grain Growth in CeO2: Dopant Effects, Defect Mechanism, and Solute Drag. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 79, 1793- 1800.
[21] Inaba, H., Nakajima, T. and Tagawa, H. (1998) Sintering Behaviors of Ceria and Gadolinia-Doped Ceria. Solid State Ionics, 106, 263-268.
[22] Kingery, W.D., Bowen, H.K. and Uhlmann, D.R. (1976) Introduction to Ceramics. 2nd Edition, John Wiley, New York, 456.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.