Composite Consolidation Coefficient Analysis of Soft Soil with Drainage Water

The consolidation coefficient is the most basic parameter to calculate the consolidation rate of soil layer, and the horizontal consolidation coefficient controls the radial water flow into the drainage well. Based on the background of the soft soil in Shantou, Guangdong Province, a series of experimental studies on the consolidation characteristics were carried out by using the modified consolidation instrument. And the concept of the composite consolidation coefficient of the drained water body was put forward. The composite consolidation coefficient reflects the consolidation characteristics of soft soil with drainage water, The test results showed that: 1) The consolidation test with drainage plate is basically consistent with the load compression curve, but its consolidation rate is fast, which is reflected by the composite consolidation coefficient. 2) In the consolidation test of water bodies with drainage, the vertical consolidation coefficient and radial consolidation coefficient are calculated by three-point method, and then the composite consolidation coefficient is obtained. The composite consolidation coefficient decreases with the increase of drain spacing ratio, effective drainage diameter and drainage height, which is basically consistent with the theoretical formula. 3) The vertical consolidation coefficient and radial consolidation coefficient decrease with the increase of the diameter of the sample, and the difference is obvious when the load is large. The large-size model with a diameter of 100 mm and a height of 100 mm is about 1.35 times of the vertical consolidation coefficient of the conventional consolidation test.

1. Introduction

A series of laboratory consolidation tests were carried out to study the consolidation characteristics of soft soil. However, there is no direct measurement and research on the horizontal consolidation coefficient which controls the radial flow into the drainage well and the composite consolidation coefficient which contains the drainage unit. In this paper, through the automatic acquisition and displacement of the reformed large-scale consolidation instrument, the consolidation test of soft soil is carried out, and the drainage plate is added in the middle of the model, which can more intuitively reflect the actual consolidation and drainage situation of engineering, and compare and analyze with the conventional test to explore the large-size consolidation rule of drainage unit and provide reference for engineering application.

2. Theoretical Derivation

2.1. Theoretical Formula of Composite Consolidation Coefficient

The total degree of consolidation of water bodies with discharge under instantaneous loading is deduced by terzaggy theory

${U}_{t}=1-\frac{8}{{\pi }^{2}}\underset{m=1}{\overset{m=\infty }{\sum }}\frac{1}{{m}^{2}}{\text{e}}^{-\left(\frac{{m}^{2}{\pi }^{2}{C}_{v}}{4{H}^{2}}+\frac{8{C}_{r}}{{F}_{n}{d}_{e}^{2}}\right)t}$ (1)

When Ut > 30%, the first term can be approximately taken:

${U}_{t}=1-\frac{8}{{\pi }^{2}}{\text{e}}^{-\left(\frac{{\pi }^{2}{C}_{v}}{4{H}^{2}}+\frac{8{C}_{r}}{{F}_{n}{d}_{e}^{2}}\right)t}$ (2)

$F\left(n\right)=\frac{n\mathrm{ln}n}{{n}^{2}-1}-\frac{3{n}^{2}-1}{4{n}^{2}}$ , $n=\frac{{d}_{e}}{{d}_{w}}$

where, Ut is the average consolidation degree of vertical drainage, %; t is consolidation time, s; dε is the effective drainage diameter of the sand well, cm. H is the vertical drainage distance of soil layer, cm; Cv is the vertical consolidation coefficient, cm2/s; Cr is radial consolidation coefficient, cm2/s.

The degree of consolidation is defined by the composite consolidation coefficient

${U}_{t}=1-\frac{8}{{\pi }^{2}}{\text{e}}^{-\frac{{\pi }^{2}{C}_{rv}}{4{H}^{2}}t}$ (3)

where, Crv is the composite consolidation coefficient, and others are as above.

Contrast Equations (2) and (3):

$\frac{{\pi }^{2}{C}_{rv}}{4{H}^{2}}=\frac{{\pi }^{2}{C}_{v}}{4{H}^{2}}+\frac{8{C}_{r}}{{F}_{n}{d}_{e}^{2}}$ (4)

From Equation (4), the ratio $\lambda$ of composite consolidation coefficient and vertical consolidation coefficient is obtained:

$\lambda =\frac{{C}_{rv}}{{C}_{v}}=\left(1+\frac{32{H}^{2}{C}_{r}}{{\pi }^{2}{F}_{n}{d}_{e}^{2}{C}_{v}}\right)=\left(1+\frac{32}{{\pi }^{2}{F}_{n}}{R}_{Hd}^{2}{R}_{rv}\right)$ (5)

where: ${R}_{Hd}$ is the ratio between the vertical drainage distance and the radial equivalent drainage distance; ${R}_{rv}$ is the ratio of radial and vertical consolidation coefficient.

From Equation (5), it can be seen that $\lambda$ is directly proportional to the square of ${R}_{Hd}$ and directly proportional to ${R}_{rv}$ . Figure 1 shows the relationship between $\lambda$ and ${R}_{Hd}$ and ${R}_{rv}$ . $\lambda$ increases with the increase of ${R}_{Hd}$ and ${R}_{rv}$ .

2.2. Three-Point Method Deduced from Experimental Results

In Figure 2, three points (t1, s1), (t2, s2) and (t3, s3) that meet the conditions are selected in the U > 30% region, and t2 = 2t1, t3 = 3t1.

Derived from Formula (2)

$\frac{{\pi }^{2}{C}_{v}}{4{H}^{2}}+\frac{8{C}_{r}}{{F}_{n}{d}_{\epsilon }^{2}}=-\frac{1}{{t}_{1}}\mathrm{ln}\left(\frac{{s}_{3}-{s}_{2}}{{s}_{2}-{s}_{1}}\right)$ (6)

3. Test Scheme

3.1. Experimental Materials

The soil samples used in the test were taken from the blow filled soft soil in Shantou district, Guangdong Province. The density of the soft soil was 1.586 g/cm3, the moisture content was 72.97%, the initial pore ratio was 1.999, the plastic limit was 25.4, and the liquid limit was 51.1.

The modified WG triplex high pressure single lever consolidation instrument is used as the test instrument. The specific modified instrument is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 1. Relationship λ with (RHd, n).

Figure 2. Relation curve between s and t.

Figure 3. Consolidation instrument.

The test was carried out under the condition of normal temperature and double drainage. For each load level, the stability standard is that the deformation observed at regular intervals is less than 0.005 mm/d, and the next load is added after the deformation is stabilized under the first load. UT7116Y static strain gauge acquisition and processing system was used for data collection and recording.

3.2. Test Scheme

In order to study the consolidation characteristics of drainage plate added into the soft soil, and analyze the drain spacing ratio within 16 - 39, the effective drainage diameter is 80 mm, 100 mm, 120 mm, and the drainage height is 50 mm and 100 mm, respectively. Different drainage conditions and model sizes are set. The seven loading levels are 12.5 kPa, 25 kPa, 50 kPa, 100 kPa, 200 kPa, 400 kPa and 800 kPa, respectively. The specific scheme is shown in Table 1.

4. Analysis of Experimental Results

4.1. Consolidation Test Analysis of Different Drainage Channels

The consolidation coefficient is an important parameter in Terzaghi’s one dimensional consolidation theory, and its size can directly reflect the degree of soil consolidation speed. Accurately measuring the consolidation coefficient is of great significance for predicting soil drainage consolidation rate and soil consolidation degree. Through the “time square root method”, the vertical consolidation coefficient of the samples without drainage plate under all levels of load and the composite consolidation coefficient of the samples with drainage plate under all levels of load were obtained. Through Formula (6), the radial consolidation coefficient Cr of the samples under all levels of load was obtained.

Schemes 1 and 2, large size model with a diameter of 100 mm and a height of 100mm, with drainage plate and without drainage plate, can be compared and analyzed. According to Figure 4, it can be seen that the vertical consolidation coefficient Cv and radial consolidation coefficient Cr are basically the same. When the load is small, Cv is large, and when the load is larger than 400 kPa, Cr is large. When adding the first level of load, the vertical consolidation coefficient Cv is relatively large, which may be affected by the self-weight stress. Starting from the second level of load, the consolidation coefficient gradually increases with the increase of load. The radial consolidation coefficient first increases and

Figure 4. Relation between consolidation coefficient and load.

Table 1. Test scheme.

then decreases with the increase of load. It may be that with the increase of load, the consolidation of soft soil goes deep, leading to deformation and blockage of drainage plate, thus affecting the radial consolidation coefficient. At 400 kPa, Cv is 1.33 m2/yr, and Crv is 45% larger than Cv. The Crv/Cv under each level of load is 1.4 times, which is basically consistent with the value of 1.37 times obtained by Formula (5). The addition of drainage plates reduces the drainage distance and speeds up the consolidation rate.

4.2. Analysis of Drainage Consolidation Test Results with Different Well Diameter Ratios

Through the scheme 2 - 5 to simulate the model size for Φ100 mm drainage consolidation test, the width of drainage board is 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm and 8 mm respectively. That is, the drain spacing ratio n is 39, 26, 20 and 16 respectively. According to Figure 5, consolidation tests of different drain spacing ratio show that the consolidation coefficient changes with load in basically the same way. As the drainage diameter increases, the composite consolidation coefficient of the

Figure 5. Relationship between composite consolidation coefficient Crv and load p.

test increases slightly. When the drain spacing ratio is 39, the experimental value is basically consistent with the results obtained by Formula (5). When the drain spacing ratio is 26, 20 and 16, the formula value is slightly larger than the test value. The main reason for the test is that the model size is small, the effect of drain spacing ratio on the composite consolidation coefficient is small, and the vertical consolidation coefficient has no effect basically. As can be seen from Figure 6, the radial consolidation coefficient Cr first increases and then decreases with the increase of load. With the increase of drain spacing ratio, n equals 39 over n equals 16 decreases by 0.17 m2/yr at 200 kPa, while other loads change little.

4.3. Analysis of Drainage Consolidation Test Results of Different Sizes

Schemes 6 - 9 were used to study the Cv of samples with different diameters without adding drain plate, and Crv of samples with different diameters with adding drain plate. Through Formula (5), the radial consolidation coefficient Cr of samples with different diameters under various loads was obtained, and compared with conventional consolidation tests.

As can be seen from Figure 7, in the soft soil consolidation test with drainage plate, with the same drain spacing ratio, the larger the effective diameter of drainage is, the smaller the composite consolidation coefficient Crv of soft soil is, that is, the consolidation rate of soft soil is getting smaller and smaller, greatest difference when 400 kPa, Φ8 cm is about 0.88 m2/yr higher than Φ10 cm Crv, increased by 58%. So engineering with “thin and dense” drainage sand Wells.

To the sample of different diameter, the changing rule of the coefficient of consolidation is roughly same; to the sample of different diameter, the vertical coefficient of consolidation and radial consolidation coefficient decreases with increasing the diameter of the sample. As shown in Figure 8, there was a large difference at the load of 400 kPa, and the Cr of Φ8 cm was about 0.098 m2/yr higher than that of Φ10 cm. This is because the increment of excess pore water pressure in soil body is the same under the same load increment, but the effective diameter of drainage increases with the increase of soil sample diameter.

Figure 7. Relation between consolidation coefficient C and load p.

Therefore, the drainage consolidation speed decreases with the increase of soil sample diameter, especially the soil sample with drainage plate, that is, the consolidation coefficient decreases with the increase of effective drainage diameter of soil sample.

The large-size model of 100 mm is larger than the Cv of conventional consolidation test, and the difference is the largest at 800 kPa. The average value of Cv under different loads differs by 0.25 m2/yr, which is about 35% of the conventional consolidation coefficient. It is concluded that the test results of conventional soil samples cannot be used in practical engineering, and the effect of size effect on the results should be fully considered.

4.4. Consolidation Coefficient Analysis of Single and Double Drainage

The effects of single drainage and double drainage on consolidation coefficient are studied in Schemes 10 - 11. According to Figure 9, under the condition of consolidation without drainage plate, the vertical consolidation coefficient Cv of single and double drainage decreases first and then gradually increases with the increase of consolidation pressure p, but the curves of the two drainage conditions are intersecting. That is, when the consolidation pressure is less than 200 kPa, the consolidation coefficient under double-sided drainage condition is larger than that under single-sided drainage condition, while when the consolidation pressure is more than 200 kPa, the situation is just the opposite. When drainage plate is added, the composite consolidation coefficient Crv of single drainage is larger than that of double drainage. With the increase of drainage height, the effect of adding drainage plate on improving consolidation rate increases obviously. According to Figure 10, the radial consolidation coefficient Cr of double-sided drainage is basically the same as that of single-sided drainage when the load is relatively small. When the load is greater than 200 kPa, the radial consolidation coefficient Cr of double-sided drainage is larger than that of single-sided drainage.

Figure 9. Relation between consolidation coefficient Crv and load p.

5. Conclusions

1) The consolidation test with drainage plate has basically the same change law of load compression curve as that without drainage plate, but its consolidation rate is fast. Composite consolidation coefficient is used to reflect the effect of adding drainage plate, so as to comprehensively reflect the consolidation rate.

2) In the consolidation test with drainage plate, the vertical consolidation coefficient and radial consolidation coefficient are calculated by “three-point method”, and then the composite consolidation coefficient is obtained. The composite consolidation coefficient decreases with the increase of the drain spacing ratio, effective drainage diameter and drainage height, which is basically consistent with the theoretical formula.

3) The consolidation coefficient changes in samples with different diameters in roughly the same way. The vertical consolidation coefficient and radial consolidation coefficient decrease with the increase of the diameter of the sample, and the difference is obvious when the load is large. The vertical consolidation coefficient of the samples with different borehole diameter ratio is basically the same, while the radial consolidation coefficient decreases slightly. Compared with double drainage and single drainage, the vertical consolidation coefficient increases first and then decreases with the increase of load, while the radial consolidation coefficient decreases when the load is greater than 400 kPa. The large-size model with a diameter of 100 mm and a height of 100 mm is about 1.35 times the vertical consolidation coefficient of conventional consolidation test. The influence of size effect on results should be fully considered in engineering.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Cite this paper

Ding, J. , You, K. , Feng, Z. and Sun, D. (2019) Composite Consolidation Coefficient Analysis of Soft Soil with Drainage Water. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7, 572-582. doi: 10.4236/wjet.2019.74041.

  Chen, X.P. (2017) Consolidation Effect of Soft Soil Deposited by Sea and Land Interchanges. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 33, 520-528.  Dong, Z.L. and Zhang, G.X. (2018) Research and Development and Application of Consolidation Technology of Shallow Supersoft Soil in Tianjin Binhai New Area. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 30, 1074-1080.  Yin, C.Q. (2017) Study on Strengthening Characteristics of Tianjin Port Ultra-Soft Soil Foundation. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 39, 122-125.  Lei, H.Y., He, C.F., Qiu, W.W. and Chen, L. (2016) Experimental Study on the Effect of Size Effect on Consolidation Characteristics of Soft Soil Filled by Blowing. Journal of Tianjin University (Natural Science and Engineering Technology Edition), 49, 73-79.  Jiang, C.X. (2005) Axisymmetric Consolidation and Plane Strain Equivalent Consolidation Analysis of Foundation with Vertical Drainage. Hohai University, Nanjing.  Deng, Y.B. (2013) Analytical Theory and Finite Element Analysis of Shaft Foundation Consolidation. Zhejiang University, Hangzhou.  Lei, H.Y., Ren, Q., Zhang, W.Z., Huang, M.S. and Kang, J.W. (2014) Experimental Analysis of Consolidation Characteristics of Blow-Filled Super Soft Soil. Journal of Engineering Geology, 22, 1039-1045.  Pei, Z.S. (2017) Study on Consolidation Characteristics of Soft Soil in Dongting Lake area. University of Science and Technology of Hunan, Xiantang.  Menard, L. and Broise, Y. (2014) Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Dynamic Consolidation. Geotechnique, 25, 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1975.25.1.3  Chen, R.P., Zhou, W.H., Wang, H.Z. and Chen, Y.M. (2005) One-Dimensional Nonlinear Consolidation of Multi-Layered Soil by Differential Quadrature Method. Computers and Geotechnics, 32, 358-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2005.05.003 