An Economic Evaluation of New Optional Calling Plans in Telephone Service

.
DOI: 10.4236/me.2011.25101   PDF   HTML     3,921 Downloads   6,152 Views  

Abstract

With the growth of competition in the telecommunication market, optional calling plans were introduced in 1980s, have expanded dramatically in 1990s and now have become widespread rate systems in many countries. In this respect, the Korean telephone market also provided various rates. Compared to other countries, however, a special optional calling plan has activated in Korean market. It is a unique calling plan where rates are based on previous calls made. That plan provides high market performance, yet it arouses criticism in the industry. There are questions raised by professionals in the industry if that plan based on previous call made is fair to consumers and is it more effective than other type of calling plan. Considering this circumstance, we theoretically analyzed and compare between rate system based on previous call made and different rate system including unlimited flat-rate and BOT, by mainly the perspective of efficiency. The results show that rate system based on past calling patterns will be economically more efficient compared to other types. Therefore, it is necessary not to prohibit this rate system, rather selectively regulating or other flexible means of regulation is desirable, nevertheless it has some week point.

Share and Cite:

S. Seol and M. Kim, "An Economic Evaluation of New Optional Calling Plans in Telephone Service," Modern Economy, Vol. 2 No. 5, 2011, pp. 901-909. doi: 10.4236/me.2011.25101.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] H. W. Choi, I. J. Kim and T. S. Kim, “Contingent Claims Valuation of Optional Plan Contracts in Telephone Industry,” International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2002, pp. 433-448.
[2] OFCOM (Office of Communications), “Investigation against BT about Potential Anti-Competitive Exclusionary Behavior,” 2004.
[3] J. Alleman, “The Pricing of Local Telephone Service,” Office of Telecommunications Special Report, US Department of Commerce, Vol. 77, No. 14, 1977.
[4] B. M. Mitchell, “Optimal Pricing of Local Telephone Service,” American Economic Review, Vol. 68, No. 4, 1978, pp. 517-537.
[5] G. Wilkinson, “The Estimation of Usage Repression under Local Measured Service: Empirical Evidence from the GTE Experiment,” In: L. Courville, , A. de Fontenary and R. Dobell Eds., Economic Analysis of Telecommunications: Theory and Applications, North-Holland Press, Amsterdam, 1983.
[6] R. Park, B. Wetzel and B. Mitchell, “Price Elasticities for Local Telephone Calls,” Econometrica, Vol. 51, No. 6, 1983, pp. 1699-1730. doi:10.2307/1912113
[7] R. Park, B. Mitchell, B. Wetzel and J. Alleman, “Changing for Local Telephone Calls: How Household Characteristics Affect the Distribution of Calls in the GTE Illinois Experiment,” Journal of Economics, Vol. 22, 1983, pp. 339-364.
[8] K. Train, D. McFadden and M. Ben-Akiva, “The Demand for Local Telephone Service: A Fully Discrete Model of Residential Calling Patterns and Service Choices,” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1987, pp. 109-123. doi:10.2307/2555538
[9] C. Martins-Filho and J. Mayo, “Demand and Pricing of Telecommunications Services: Evidence and Welfare Implications,” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1993, pp. 439-454. doi:10.2307/2555967
[10] E. J. Miravete, “The Welfare Performance of Sequential Pricing Mechanisms,” International Economic Review, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2005, pp. 1321-1360. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2354.2005.00369.x
[11] Y. Masuda and S. Whang, “On the Optimality of Fixed- up-to Tariff for Telecommunications Service,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2006, pp. 247-253. doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0097
[12] S. Jensen, “Implications of Competitive Nonlinear Pricing: Tariffs with Inclusive Consumption,” Review of Economic Design, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2006, pp. 9-29. doi:10.1007/s10058-006-0002-3
[13] KISDI, “An Empirical Analysis and Its Strategic Implications for Call Substitution from Fixed to Mobile,” 2007.
[14] KISDI (Korea Information Society Development Institute), “Toward a Comprehensive Pricing Policy Adapted to the Competitive Market System,” 1997.
[15] M. B. Yeom, “Economic Analysis of ICT Service Optional Calling Plans,” Economic Papers, Vol. 14, 1998, pp. 61-87.
[16] J. W. Byun, “Block of Time Tariff with Heterogeneous Consumers,” ICT Policy Studies, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2005, pp. 125- 148.
[17] S. H. Seol and S. C. Kweon, “Economic Effect Analysis of the Introduction of Tailored Flat Pricing for Fixed Line Telephone Service,” Electronics & Telecommunications Research Institute, Daejeon, 2005.
[18] D. Prelec and G. Loewenstein, “The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt,” Marketing Science, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1998, pp. 4-28. doi:10.1287/mksc.17.1.4
[19] B. Hayes, “Competitions and Two-Part Tariffs,” Journal of Business, Vol. 60, No. 1, 1987, pp. 41-54. doi:10.1086/296384
[20] G. Stigler, “The Theory of Price,” Macmillan, New York, 1987.
[21] A. Stole, “Price Discrimination and Imperfect Competition,” Mimeo, 2003.
[22] J. C. Bonbright, “Principles of Public Utility Rates,” Columbia University Press, New York, 1961.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.