Biological Nitrogen and COD Removal of Nutrient-Rich Wastewater Using Aerobic and Anaerobic Reactors
Florante A. MAGNAYE, Pag-asa D. GASPILLO, Joseph L. AURESENIA
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2009.15045   PDF    HTML     7,558 Downloads   13,694 Views   Citations


A preliminary study on nitrogen and organic removal efficiency of a lab-scale system using aerobic and an-aerobic reactors was performed. A simulated wastewater containing elevated levels of nitrogen was used. This paper aims to compare the efficiency of aerobic and anaerobic reactors in achieving nitrogen and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal of nutrient-rich wastewater. It also presents the start-up experi-mentation conducted on simulated wastewater using two different reactors configured as aerobic and anaero-bic. Start-up experiments were carried out using a 5-liter acrylic aerobic reactor and a 4-liter flask anaerobic reactor containing activated sludge taken from De La Salle University (DLSU) wastewater treatment plant as a source of inoculum. Simulated wastewater was continuously fed to the two reactors and the time course of biomass growth was monitored by measuring the biomass concentration represented by mixed liquor volatile solids (MLVS). The time course of organic pollutant reduction by measuring the chemical oxygen demand (COD) was conducted until steady state condition was reached. On the other hand, COD and nitrogen tests such as Ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), Nitrite nitrogen (NO2--N), Nitrate nitrogen (NO3--N) were also per-formed using 5 batch aerobic reactors containing different concentrations of wastewater and a single batch anaerobic reactor to see the effect of different feed concentrations in the removal of nitrogen. Preliminary results showed that 98% reduction in COD was obtained in aerobic reactor, as supported by increasing con-centration of MLVS, with a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 5 hours after 11 days while 34% reduction in COD was obtained in anaerobic reactor with the same HRT after 14 days.

Share and Cite:

F. MAGNAYE, P. GASPILLO and J. AURESENIA, "Biological Nitrogen and COD Removal of Nutrient-Rich Wastewater Using Aerobic and Anaerobic Reactors," Journal of Water Resource and Protection, Vol. 1 No. 5, 2009, pp. 376-380. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2009.15045.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] J. N. Galloway, “Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions and potential solutions,” Science Journal, May 2008.
[2] R. A. Duce, “Impacts of atmospheric anthropogenic ni-trogen on the open ocean,” Science Journal, May 2008.
[3] F. Moharram and R. Bhargava, “The Optimum stage for nitrification efficiency in the biofilm-ASP reactor,” ICWNR’04, pp 24?31, 2003.
[4] M. Kermani, B. J. Bina, H. Movahedian, M. M. Amin, and M. Nikaeen, “Biological phosphorous and nitrogen removal from wastewater using moving bed biofilm process,” Iranian Journal of Biotechnology, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2009.
[5] V. Reginatto, R. M. Teixeira, F. Pereira, W. Schmidell, J. A. Furigo, R. Menes, C. Etchebehere, and H. M. Soares, “Anaerobic ammonium oxidation in a bioreactor treating slaughterhouse wastewater,” Brazilian Journal of Chemi-cal Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2005.
[6] X. Zheng, J. Tong, H. J. Li, and Y. G. Chen, “The inves-tigation of effect of organic carbon sources addition in anaerobic-aerobic (low dissolved oxygen) sequencing batch reactor for nutrients removal from wastewaters,” Bioresource Technology, Vol. 100, pp. 2515?2520, 2009.
[7] D. Paredes, P. Kuschk, T. S. A. Mbwette, F. Stange, R. A. Muller, and H. Koser, “New aspects of microbial nitrogen transformations in the context of wastewater treatment: A review,” Engineering Life Science, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 13?25, 2007.
[8] S. W. Hu, F. L. Yang, S. T Liu, and L. G. Yu, “The deve- lopment of a novel hybrid aerating membrane-anaerobic baffled reactor for the simultaneous nitrogen and organic carbon removal from wastewater,” Water Research, Vol. 43, pp. 381?388, 2009.
[9] C. P. L Grady, G. Daigger, and H. Lim, “Biological wastewater treatment,” 2nd Edition, Revised and Ex-panded, Marcel Dekker Inc., N.Y., 1999.
[10] T. Khin and A. P. Annachhatre, “Novel microbial nitro-gen processes,” Biotechnology Advances, Vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 519?532, 2004.
[11] APHA/AWWA/WEF, “Standard methods for the exami-nation of water and wastewater,” 18th Ed., Washinton DC, USA., 1992.
[12] A. M. Corral, F. Gonzalez, J. L. Campos, and R. Mendez, “Partial nitrification in sharon reactor in the presence of salts and organic carbon compounds,” Process Biochem-istry, Vol. 40, pp. 3109?3118, 2005.
[13] R. He, X. W. Liu, Z. J. Zhang, and D. S. Shen, “Charac-teristics of the bioreactor landfill system using an anaero-bic-aerobic process for nitrogen removal,” Bioresource Technology, Vol. 98, pp. 2526?2532, 2007.
[14] W. Li and S. K. Zheng, “A combination of anaerobic and aerobic treatment for ammonia-laden coke plant effluent: The pilot study,” International Society for Environmental Information Sciences, Vol. 2, pp. 602?610, 2004.
[15] S. Chen, D. Z. Sun, and J. S. Chung, “Simultanoeous removal of COD and ammonium from landfill leachate using an anaerobic-aerobic moving bed biofilm reactor system,” Waste Management, Vol. 28, pp. 339?346, 2008.
[16] J. H. Im, H. J. Woo, M. W. Choi, K. B. Han, and C. W. Kim, “Simultaneous organic and nitrogen removal from municipal landfill leachate using an anaerobic-aerobic system,” Water Research, Vol. 35, pp. 2403?2410, 2001.

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.