Developing a Framework to Measure Watershed Sustainability by Using Hydrological/Water Quality Model
Aditya Sood, William F. Ritter
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2011.311089   PDF    HTML     7,622 Downloads   13,510 Views   Citations


A framework is built, wherein hydrological/water quality model is used to measure watershed sustainability. For this framework, watershed sustainability has been defined and quantified by defining social, environmental and biodiversity indicators. By providing weightage to these indicators, a “River Basin Sustainability Index” is built. The watershed sustainability is then calculated based on the concepts of reliability, resilience and vulnerability. The framework is then applied to a case study, where, based on watershed management principles, four land use scenarios are created in GIS. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is used as a hydrology/water quality model. Based on the results the land uses are ranked for sustainability and policy implications have been discussed. This results show that landuse (both type and location) impact watershed sustainability. The existing land use is weak in environmental sustainability. Also, riparian zones play a critical role in watershed sustainability, although beyond certain width their contribution is not significant.

Share and Cite:

A. Sood and W. Ritter, "Developing a Framework to Measure Watershed Sustainability by Using Hydrological/Water Quality Model," Journal of Water Resource and Protection, Vol. 3 No. 11, 2011, pp. 788-804. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2011.311089.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), “Our Common Future,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.
[2] C. Tortajada, “Sustainable Development: A Critical Assessment of Past and Present Views,” In: A. K. Biswas and C. Tortajada, Eds., Appraising Sustainable Development: Water Management and Environmental Challenges, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005.
[3] R. Goodland, “The Concept of Environmental Sustainability,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systemetics, Vol. 26, 1995, pp. 1-24. doi:10.1146/
[4] R. Goodland and D. Herman, “Environmental Sustainability: Universal and Non-Negotiable,” Ecological Applications, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1996, pp. 1002-1017. doi:10.2307/2269583
[5] D. Satterthwaite, “Sustainable Cities or Cities That Contribute to Sustainable Development?” Urban Studies, Vol. 34, No. 10, 1997, pp. 1667-1691. doi:10.1080/0042098975394
[6] G. McGranahan and D. Satterthwaite, “Urban Centers: An Assessment of Sustainability,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Vol. 28, 2003, pp. 243-274. doi:10.1146/
[7] M. Wackernagel and W. Rees, “Our Ecological Footprint, Reducing Human Impact on the Earth,” New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, 1996.
[8] D. R. Van Vliet, “Sustainable Subdivision Planning and Design: Analysis, Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography,” In Issues in Urban Sustainability: Institute of Urban Studies, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, 1994.
[9] N. H. Afgan, “Sustainability Concept for Energy, Water and Environment Systems,” In: Bogdan and Duic, Eds., Sustainable Energy Technologies, Swets and Zeitlinger B.V., Lisse, 2004.
[10] R. Kranz, S. P. Gasteyer, H. Theodore, R. Shafer and A. Steinman, “Conceptual Foundations for the Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable. Universal Council on Water Resources,” Water Resources Update, No. 127, 2004, pp. 11-19.
[11] R. Shah, “International Frameworks of Environmental Statistics and Indicators,” Inception Workshop on the Institutional Strengthening and Collection of Environment Statistics, 25-28 April 2000, Samarkand.
[12] H. T. Heintz Jr., “Conceptual Foundations for the Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable,” Water Resources Impact, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2006, pp. 7-10.
[13] E. T. Smith and H. X. Zhang, “Overview/Introduction: Developing Indicators for the Sustainable Water Re- sources Roundtable,” Water Resources Impact, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2006, pp. 3-6.
[14] P. M. Barlow, W. M. Alley and D. N. Myers, “Hydrological Aspects of Water Sustainability and Their Relation to a National Assessment of Water Availability and Use,” Water Resource Update, Vol. 127, No. 1, 2004, pp. 76-86.
[15] P. H. Gleick, “Water in Crisis: Paths to Sustainable Water Use,” Ecological Applications, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1998, pp. 571-579. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0571:WICPTS]2.0.CO;2
[16] H. M. L. Chaves and S. Alipaz, “An Integrated Indicator for Basin Hydrology, Environment, Life, and Policy: The Watershed Sustainability Index,” Water Resources Management, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2007, pp. 883-895. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9107-2
[17] C. Santhi, R. Srinivasan, J. G. Arnold and J. R. Williams, “A Modeling Approach to Evaluate the Impacts of Water Quality Management Plans Implemented in a Watershed in Texas,” Environmental Modelling & Software, Vol. 21, No. 8, 2006, pp. 1141-1157. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.05.013
[18] S. L. Neitsch, J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, J. R. Williams and K. W. King, “Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theo- retical Documentation, Version 2000,” Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Blackland Research Center, Temple, 2002.
[19] P. W. Gassman, M. R. Reyes, C. H. Green and J. G. Arnold, “The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions,” American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 1211-1250.
[20] R. D. Harmel, C. W. Richardson and K. W. King, “Hydrologic Response of a Small Watershed Model to Generated Precipitation,” Transactions of the ASABE, Vol. 43, No. 6, 2000, pp. 1483-1488.
[21] T. W. R. Wallis and J. F. Griffiths, “An Assessment of the Weather Generator (WXGEN) Used in the Erosion/ Productivity Impact Calculator,” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 73, No. 1-2, 1995, pp. 115-133. doi:10.1016/0168-1923(94)02172-G
[22] P. D. Loucks and J. S. Gladwell, “International Hydrology Series—Sustainability Criteria for Water Resource Systems,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
[23] L. H. Gunderson, “Ecological Resilience—In Theory and Application,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, Vol. 31, 2000, pp. 425-439. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
[24] R. J. T. Klein, M. J. Smit, H. Goosen and C. H. Hulsbergen, “Resilience and Vulnerability: Coastal Dynamics or Dutch Dikes?” The Geographical Journal, Vol. 164, No. 3, 1998, pp. 259-268. doi:10.2307/3060615
[25] K. Fara, “How Natural Are ‘Natural Disasters’? Vulnerability to Drought of Communal Farmers in Southern Namibia,” Risk Management, Vol. 3, No. 3. 2001, pp. 47-63. doi:10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240093
[26] T. R. Kjeldsen and D. Rosbjerg, “Assessment of the Sustainability of a Water Resources System Expansion,” Integrated Water Resources Management, Vol. 272, 2001, pp. 151-156.
[27] D. N. R. E. C., “Inland Bays/Atlantic Ocean Basin,” Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Dover, 2001
[28] A. Sood and W. F. Ritter, “Evaluation of Best Management Practices in Millsboro Pond Watershed Using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model,” Journal of Water Resource and Protection, Vol. 2, No. 5, 2010, pp. 403-412. doi:10.4236/jwarp.2010.25047
[29] A. S. Andres, “Ground-Water Recharge Potential Mapping in Kent and Sussex Counties, Delaware,” Delaware Geological Survey, Report of Investigations No. 66, University of Delaware, Newark, 2004.
[30] J. K. Northcutt and D. R. Jones, “A Survey of Water Use and Common Industry Practices in Commercial Broiler Processing Facilities,” Journal of Applied Poultry Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2004, pp. 48-54.
[31] T. Hashimoto, J. R. Stedinger and D. P. Loucks, “Reliability, Resiliency, and Vulnerability Criteria for Water Resource System Performance Evaluation,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1982, pp. 14-20. doi:10.1029/WR018i001p00014
[32] S. K. Jain and P. K. Bhunya, “Reliability, Resilience and Vulnerability of a Multipurpose Storage Reservoir,” Hydrological Sciences Journal, Vol. 53, No. 2, 2008, pp. 434-447. doi:10.1623/hysj.53.2.434

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.