Threshold Effects of R&D Intensity on Enterprise Performance from the Perspective of Scientific Research Achievements Transformation Ability

Yuequn Wei; Guiping Bao

doi:10.4236/oalib.1104667

Home > Journals > Biomedical & Life Sciences | Business & Economics > OALibJ

Open Access Library Journal > Vol.5 No.7, July 2018

Threshold Effects of R&D Intensity on Enterprise Performance from the Perspective of Scientific Research Achievements Transformation Ability ()

Yuequn Wei^*, Guiping Bao

School of Business Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, China.

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1104667 PDF HTML XML 355 Downloads 671 Views

Abstract

Based on the listed company data of high-tech enterprise of manufacturing industry from year 2012 to 2016, this paper analyzed the no-linear effect of R&D intensity on firm performance with different ability of R&D achievements transformation. The empirical results show that the R&D input intensity has a double threshold effect on the capability of R&D achievement conversion. When the conversion ability of R&D achievement is lower than the first threshold value of 2.19%, the R&D input intensity significantly positively affects the enterprise performance; after more than 2.19%, the role of R&D input will decrease significantly and become less significant. When more than second threshold of 6.75%, R&D input intensity will significantly negatively affect enterprise performance; the relationship between R&D input intensity and firm performance has significant industry differences. Therefore, paying close attention to the nature of the industry and improving the transformation capability of scientific research achievements is an important measure for high-tech enterprises to improve their R&D effect, seize the market and improve their performance.

Keywords

R&D Investment Intensity, Firm Performance, Threshold Effect, Industry Differences, Transformation Ability of Scientific Research Achievement

Share and Cite:

Wei, Y. and Bao, G. (2018) Threshold Effects of R&D Intensity on Enterprise Performance from the Perspective of Scientific Research Achievements Transformation Ability. Open Access Library Journal, 5, 1-12. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1104667.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	孙晓华, 辛梦依. R&D投资越多越好吗?——基于中国工业部门面板数据的门限回归分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(3): 377-385.
[2]	陈宏明, 胥思. 中小板上市公司研发投入对盈利能力的影响研究[J]. 商业会计, 2013(6): 93-94.
[3]	陈燕宁. 融资约束?研发投入与企业绩效相关性研究[J]. 经济论坛, 2017(5): 95-112.
[4]	翁梅金, 黄怡, 林元连. 董事会成员激励对研发投入与企业绩效关系影响的研究[J]. 科技和产业, 2017, 17(2): 76-82.
[5]	许佩佩. 研发投入与企业绩效的相关性研究——基于创业板制造企业数据的检验[J]. 创新科技, 2016(12): 26-28.
[6]	Racela, O.C., Mathur, I. and Booth, G.G. (2016) Short- and Long-Run Effects of Internationalization and R&D Intensity on Firm Performance. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 34, 28-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2015.12.001
[7]	Olof, E., Astrid, K. and Martin, S.H. (2011) The R&D-Growth Paradox Arises in Fast-Growing Sectors. Research Policy, 40, 664-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.004
[8]	盛宇华, 路璐. R&D投入与企业绩效的倒N型关系研究[J]. 南京社会科学, 2016(1): 32-38.
[9]	Booth, G.G., Juntilab, J., Kallunki, J.P., et al. (2006) How Does Financial Environment Affect the Stock Market Valuation of R&D Spending? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 15, 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2005.03.003
[10]	Lin, B., Lee, Y. and Hung, S. (2006) R&D Intensity and Commercialization Orientation Effects on Financial Performance. Journal of Business Research, 59, 679-685.
[11]	Le, S.A., Walters, B. and Kroll, M. (2005) The Moderating Effects of External Monitors on the Relationship between R&D Spending and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Research, 59, 278-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.003
[12]	Lee, C. and Wu, H. (2016) How Do Slack Resources Affect the Relationship between R&D Expenditures and Firm Performance? R&D Management, 46, 958-978. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12141
[13]	戴小勇, 成力为. 研发投入强度对企业绩效影响的门槛效应研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(11): 1708-1716.
[14]	韩先锋, 惠宁. 研发投入对战略新兴企业绩效影响的异质门槛效应[J]. 软科学, 2016, 30(4): 56-59.
[15]	Kim, Y. (2014) The Effect of Research and Development Investment and Desorptive Capacity on Firm Performance. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 22, 252-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2014.973163
[16]	Sharma, P., Davcik, N.S. and Pillai, K.G. (2016) Product Innovation as a Mediator in the Impact of R&D Expenditure and Brand Equity on Marketing Performance. Journal of Business Research, 69, 5662-5669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.074
[17]	Chiesa, V. and Frattini, V. (2009) Evaluation and Performance Measurement of Research and Development: Techniques and Perspectives for Multi-Level Analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849801942
[18]	张培刚. 创新理论的现实意义: 对熊彼待《经济发展理论》的介绍和评论[J]. 经济学动态, 1991(2): 57-63.
[19]	赵志耘, 杜红亮. 中国科技成果转化过程监测指标体系探讨[J]. 中国软科学, 2011(11): 8-14.
[20]	周祥军. 初创企业研发投入强度与绩效门限效应研究—基于科研成果转化能力视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2014(22): 112-117.
[21]	张耘, 钟少颖. 上市企业研发投入的现状和影响因素研究—基于跨行业数据的分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2014(3): 92-98.
[22]	胡义东, 仲伟俊. 高新技术企业技术创新绩效影响因素的实证研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2011(4): 80-85.
[23]	董明放,韩先锋.研发投入强度与战略性新兴产业绩效[J].统计研究, 2016, 33(1): 45-53.
[24]	Fe11er, I. and Anderson, G. (1994) A Benefit-Cost Approach to the Evaluation of State Technology Development Program. Economic Development Quarterly, 8, 127-140.
[25]	谢丽云. 科技成果转化评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2009.
[26]	Hansen, B.E. (1999) Threshold Effects in Non-Dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing and Inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93, 345-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00025-1