Interfacial Actions and Adherence of an Interpenetrating Polymer Network Thin Film on Aluminum Substrate

DOI: 10.4236/jsemat.2011.13013   PDF   HTML     4,490 Downloads   8,130 Views   Citations


The interpenetrating polymer networks (IPN) thin film with the –C=O group in one network and the terminal –N=C=O group in another network on an aluminum substrate to reinforce the adherence between IPN and aluminum through interfacial reactions, were obtained by dip-pulling the pretreated aluminum substrate into the viscous-controlled IPN precursors and by the following thinning treatment to the IPN film to a suitable thickness. The interfacial actions and the adhesion strengths of the IPN on the pretreated aluminum substrate were investigated by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and strain-stress(?-?) measurements. The XPS and FTIR detection results indicated that the elements’ contents of N, O, and Al varied from the depths of IPN. The in-terfacial reaction occurred between the –N=C=O group of IPN and the AlO(OH) of pretreated aluminum. The in-creased force constant for –C=O double bond and the lower frequency shift of –C=O stretching vibration absorption peak both verified the formation of hydrogen bond between the –OH group in AlO(OH) and the –C=O group in IPN. The adherence detections indicated that the larger amount of –N=C=O group in the IPN, the higher shear strengths between the IPN thin film and the aluminum substrate.

Share and Cite:

W. Cui, D. Tang, J. Liu and F. Yang, "Interfacial Actions and Adherence of an Interpenetrating Polymer Network Thin Film on Aluminum Substrate," Journal of Surface Engineered Materials and Advanced Technology, Vol. 1 No. 3, 2011, pp. 89-94. doi: 10.4236/jsemat.2011.13013.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] D. H. Kim, K. H. Kim, W. H. Jo and J. Kim, “Studies on Polymer-Metal Interfaces, 3a An Analysis of Interfacial Characteristics between Aminefunctionalizedpolystyrene/ Copper and between Hydroxyl-Functionalized Polysty-rene/Copper,” Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 201, No. 18, 2000, pp. 2699-2704. doi:10.1002/1521-3935(20001201)201:18<2699::AID-MACP2699>3.0.CO;2-M
[2] E. Sabatini, J. C. Boulakia, M. Bruening and I. Rubinstein, “Thioaromatic Monolayers on Gold: A New Family of Self-Assembling Monolayers,” Langmuir, Vol. 9, No. 11, 1993, pp. 2974-2981. doi:10.1021/la00035a040
[3] J. F. Watts, A. Rattana and M.-L. Abel, “Interfacial Che-mistry of Adhesives on Hydrated Aluminum and Hy- Drated Aluminum Treated with an Organosilane,” Surface and Interface Analysis, Vol. 36, No. 11, 2004, pp. 1449- 1468. doi:10.1002/sia.1918
[4] M. ?hman and D. Persson, “An Integrated in Situ ATR-FTIR and EIS Set-Up to Study Buried Metal- Po-lymer Interfaces Exposed to an Electrolyte Solution,” Electrochimica Acta, Vol. 52, No. 16, 2007, pp. 5159- 5171.
[5] M. R. Alexander, S. Payan and T. M. Due, “Interfacial Interactions of Plasma-Polymerized Acrylic Acid and an Oxidized Aluminium Surface Investigated Using XPS, FTIR and Poly(Acrylic Acid) as a Model Compound,” Surface and Interface Analysis, Vol. 26, No. 13, 1998, pp. 961-973. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199812)26:13<961::AID-SIA432>3.0.CO;2-7
[6] G. Y. Seoung, I. Y. Kim, I. K. Sun and S. J. Kim, “Swell- ing and Electroresponsive Characteristics of Interpene- Trating Polymer Network Hydrogels,” Polymer Interna- tional, Vol. 54, No. 8, 2005, pp. 1169-1174. doi:10.1002/pi.1825
[7] L. J. Atanasoska, S. G. Anderson, H. M.Meyer, Z. Lin and J. H. Weaver, “Aluminum/Polyimide Interface For-mation: An X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study of Selective Chemical Bonding,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, Vol. 5, No. 6, 1987, pp. 3325-3333. doi:10.1116/1.574191
[8] A. Selmani, “Theoretical Investigation of Chemical Bonding at Aluminum/Polyimide Interface,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1990, pp. 123-126.
[9] A. Calderone, R. Lazzaroni and J. L. Bre′das, “A The- oretical Study of the Interfaces between Aluminum and Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate), Polycaprolactone, and Pol- ystyrene: Illustration of the Reactivity of Aluminum To-wards Ester Groups and Phenyl Rings,” Macromolecular Theory and Simulations, Vol. 7, No. 5, 1998, pp. 509-520. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3919(19980901)7:5<509::AID-MATS509>3.0.CO;2-Z
[10] J. van den Brand, W. G. Sloof and H. Terryn, “Correla- tion between Hydroxyl Fraction and O/Al Atomic Ratio as Determined from XPS Spectra of Aluminum Oxide Layers,” Surface and Interface Analysis, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2004, pp. 81-88. doi:10.1002/sia.1653
[11] M. R. Alexander, G. Beamson and C. J. Blomfield, “In- teraction of Carboxylic Acids with the Oxyhydroxide Surface of Aluminum: Poly(Acrylic Acid), Acetic Acid and Propionic Acid on Pseudoboehmite,” Journal of Ele- ctron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, Vol. 121, No. 1-3, 2001, pp. 19-32. doi:10.1016/S0368-2048(01)00324-3
[12] H. Hu, J. Saniger, J. Garcia-Alejandre and V. M. Casta?o, “Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy Studies of the Reaction between Polyacrylic Acid and Metal Oxides,” Materials Letters, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1991, pp. 281-285. doi:10.1016/0167-577X(91)90014-W
[13] J. Yu, M. Ree, Y.H. Park, T.J. Shin, W. Cai, D. Zhou and K.-W. Lee, “Adhesion of Poly(4,4-Oxydiphenylene Py- romellitimide) to Copper Metal Using a Polymeric Primer: Effects of Miscibility and Polyimide Precursor Origin,” Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 201, No. 5, 2000, pp. 491-499. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3935(20000301)201:5<491::AID-MACP491>3.0.CO;2-2
[14] P. G. Roth and F. J. Boerio, “Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering from Poly(4-Vinyl Pyridine),” Journal of Po-lymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, Vol. 25, No. 9, 1987, pp. 1923-1933. doi:10.1002/polb.1987.090250912
[15] W. Possart, C. Bockenheimer and B. Valeske, “The State of Metal Surfaces after Blasting Treatment Part I: Technical Aluminum,” Surface and Interface Analysis, Vol. 33, No. 8, 2002, pp. 687-696. doi:10.1002/sia.1436
[16] M. ?hman, D. Persson and C. Leygraf, “In Situ ATR- FTIR Studies of the Aluminium/Polymer Interface upon Exposure to Water and Electrolyte,” Progress in Organic Coatings, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2006, pp. 78-88. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2006.07.002

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.