Trade Intensity Spillover Effects on East Asian Sustainable Economic Growth
Elsadig Musa Ahmed
DOI: 10.4236/me.2011.24050   PDF   HTML     5,960 Downloads   10,472 Views   Citations


This paper has included the exports and imports per unit of labour (trade intensity) in the intensive growth model beside the traditional factors of production such as capital deepening to find out the contribution of total factor productivity per unit of labour (TFP intensity) to the economic growth of the most significant East Asian countries [China, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea (Republic of Korea), Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand]. This paper finds out that the impact of trade intensity is positive with little contribution to TFP intensity growth with light contribution of labour productivity to these countries economic growth. These findings showed that most of East Asian productivity is input driven without technological progress to display the spillover effects of the interaction of foreign technology and human capital that should be translated into technology transfer to local firms and advanced skills, with the exception of Japan and South Korea.

Share and Cite:

E. Ahmed, "Trade Intensity Spillover Effects on East Asian Sustainable Economic Growth," Modern Economy, Vol. 2 No. 4, 2011, pp. 447-454. doi: 10.4236/me.2011.24050.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] J. Juthathip, “Determinants of Export Performance in East and Southeast Asia,” ERD Working Paper, Asian Development Bank No. 106, 2007.
[2] R. W. Jones and H. Kierzkowski, “A Framework for Fragmentation.” In: S. W. Arndt and H. Kierzkowski, Eds., Fragmentation: New Production Patterns in the World Economy, Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.
[3] S. W. Arndt and A. Huemer, “Trade, Production Networks and the Exchange Rate,” Lowe Institute of Political Economy, Claremont McKenna College, 2004.
[4] M. Obstfeld, “Exchange Rates and Adjustment: Perspectives from the New Open-Economy Macroeconomics,” Discussion Paper 3533, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, 2002.
[5] J. E. Rauch and V. Trindade, “Information, International Substitutability and Globalization,” University of California, San Diego and Syracuse University, 2002.
[6] G. Blalock and F. M. Veloso, “Imports, Productivity Growth, and Supply Chain Learning,” World Development, Vol. 35, No. 7, 2007, pp. 1134-1151. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.10.009
[7] W. Keller, “Do Trade Patterns and Technology Flows Affect Productivity Growth,” World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2000, pp. 17-47.
[8] K. Saggi, ‘Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and International Technology Transfer: A Survey,” World Bank Research Observer, 2002.
[9] S. Werner, “Recent Development in International Management Research: A Review of 20 Top Management Journals,” Journal of Management, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2002, pp. 277-305.
[10] M. Amiti and J. Konings, “Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia,” American Economic Review, Vol. 97, No. 5, 2007, pp. 1611-1638.
[11] A. M. Fernandes, “Trade Policy, Trade Volumes, and Plant-Level Productivity in Colombian Manufacturing Industries,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 71, No. 1, 2007, pp. 52-71.
[12] W. Keller and S. R. Yeaple, “Multinational Enterprises, International Trade, and Productivity Growth: Firm Level Evidence from the United States,” Discussion Paper, Working Paper 9504, National Bureau of Economics Research, Cambridge, February 2003.
[13] M. MacGarvie, “Do Firms Learn from International Trade,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 88, No. 1, 2006, pp. 46-60.
[14] M. A. Muendler, “Trade, Technology, and Productivity: A Study of Brazilian Manufacturers 1986-1998,” CESifo Working Paper No. 1148, Ifo Institute for Economic Research, Munich, 2004.
[15] R. M. Solow, “The Production Function and the Theory of Capital,” Review of Economics Studies, Vol. XXIII, 1956, pp. 101-108.
[16] R. M. Solow, “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 39, 1957, pp. 312-320.
[17] M. Abramovitz, “Resource and Output Trends in the United States since 1870,” American Economic Review, Vol. 46, No. 2, 1956, pp. 5-23.
[18] E. F. Denison, “Why Growth Rates Differ,” Brookings, Washington D.C, 1967.
[19] J.-II Kim, and L. Lau, “The Sources of Economic Growth of the East Asian Newly Industrialised Countries,” Journal of Japanese and International Economies, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1994, pp. 235-271. doi:10.1006/jjie.1994.1013
[20] E. F. Denison, “The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States and the Alternative before Use,” Supplementary Study, Committee for Economic Development, New York, 1962, pp. 229-255.
[21] A. Young, “A Tale of Two Cities; Factor Accumulation and Technological Change in Hong-Kong and Singapore,” Macroeconomics Annual, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1992, pp. 13-54.
[22] A. Young, “The Tyranny of Numbers; Confronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian Growth Experience,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 3, 1995, pp. 641-680. doi:10.2307/2946695
[23] P. Krugman, “The Myth of Asia’s Miracle,” Foreign Affairs, November-December 1994, pp. 62-78.
[24] M. A. Elsadig, ‘Foreign Direct Investment Intensity Effects on TFP Intensity of ASEAN 5 Plus 2,” Journal of Economic Development, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2008, pp. 155- 166.
[25] P. S. Rao and R. S. Preston. “Inter-Factor Substitution, Economic of Scale, and Technical Change: Evidence from Canadian Industries,” Empirical Economics, Vol. 9, No. 4, 1984, pp. 247-62.
[26] M. A. Elsadig, “Biochemical Oxygen Demand Emissions Impact On Malaysia’s Manufacturing Productivity Growth,” Global Economic Review, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2007, pp. 305-319.
[27] M. A. Elsadig, “Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Impact on Malaysia’s Manufacturing Productivity Growth,” World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2006, pp. 58-69.
[28] J. Madsen, “Economic Growth, TFP Convergence and the World Export of Ideas: A Century of Evidence,” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 1, 2008, pp. 145-167.
[29] E. C. Prescott, “Needed: A Theory of Total Factor Productivity,” International Economic Review, Vol. 39, No. 3, 1998, pp. 525-551.
[30] Hall, R. Hall, C. Jones, “Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 114, No. 1, 1999, pp. 83-116.
[31] J. Fagerberg, “Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 32, 1994, pp. 1147-1175.
[32] D. Dollar and K Sokoloff, “Patterns of Productivity Growth in South Korean Manufacturing Industries 1963-1979,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 33, No. 2, 1990, pp. 309-327. doi:10.1016/0304-3878(90)90026-8
[33] J. W. Kendrick, “Producative Trends Capital and Labour,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1956, pp. 248-257. doi:10.2307/1925777
[34] J. W. Kendrick, “Productivity Trends in the United States,” Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1961.
[35] E. F. Denison and P. Edward, “Accounting of Slower Economic Growth; the United States in the 1970s,” The Brooking Institution, Washington DC, 1979.
[36] Z. Griliches and D. W. Jorgenson, “Capital Theory: Technical Progress and Capital Structure, Sources of Measured Productivity Change Capital Input,” American Economic Review, Vol. 52, No. 1, 1962, pp. 50-61.
[37] D. W. Jorgenson, F. M. Gollop and B. Fraumenri, “Productivity and US Economic Growth,” Amsterdam North Holland, 1987.
[38] R. Mahadevan, “Assessing the Output and Productivity Growth of Malaysia’s Manufacturing Sector,” Journal of Asian Economics, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2001, pp. 587-597. doi:10.1016/S1049-0078(01)00104-X
[39] F.C. Wong, “Patterns of Labour Productivity Growth and Employment Shift in the Singapore Manufacturing Industries,” The Singapore Economic Review, Vol. 38, No. 2, 1993, pp. 231-251.
[40] J. Felipe, “On the Myth and Mystery of Singapore’s Zero TFP,” Asian Economic Journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2000, pp. 187-208. doi:10.1111/1467-8381.00108
[41] R Mahadevan, “New Evidence on the Export-led Growth Nexus: A Case Study of Malaysia,” The World Economy, Vol. 30, No. 7, 2007, pp. 1069-1083. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01030.x
[42] A. B. Bernard and B. Jensen, “Exporting and Productivity in the USA,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2004, pp. 343-357. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grh020
[43] R. F. Engle and C. W. J. Granger, “Time-Series Econometrics: Cointegration and Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity,” Advanced Information on the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, 2003.
[44] Z. L. Robert and D. E. David, “Trade and Growth: Import Led or Export Led? Evidence from Japan and Korea,” Center on Japanese Economy and Business Columbia Business School, Working Paper, No. 165, 1999, pp. 1- 29.

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.