f view disseminated in our society that art is only for entertainment or for the wealthier classes (Magro, 2005; Bergonski & Stoltz, 2014) . This is in line with the opinion of Duarte Júnior, who states that: “art continues to be seen, inside school itself, merely as leisure, a form of amusement in-between the “useful” activities of the other disciplines” (Duarte-Júnior, 2012: p. 81) .
In view of this it is evident that schools as they are at the moment need to reassess their priorities and seek teaching practices aimed at the emancipation of the subject as well as contributing to their development taking place in an integral manner. The analyses of the records in the diaries kept at the school using the Waldorf methodology make it evident that this teaching practice is contrary to the materialistic trend that pervades conventional education, given that it is based on the principle that a subject’s education should occur in a complete manner whereby teaching practices are planned with the development of the child or adolescent in mind (Steiner, 2007, 2013; Veiga & Stoltz, 2014; Andrade Silva, 2015; Stoltz, 2016) . Thus, based on the uniformities found in the diaries, it was seen that the artistic element pervades all Waldorf teaching and is, therefore, an instrument used in the process of the student’s development with regard to the affective, cognitive and volitional aspects.
As explained in the categories “art as a means of teaching” and “art as an instrument for affective development”, all subjects at the Waldorf school are taught imbued with music, dancing, painting and poetry. This occurs because, for Steiner, the founder of Waldorf Education, the psychological mechanism takes place between “observing and thinking, between feeling and thinking, which, by its effect, motivates thought and individuality” (Schleder & Stoltz, 2014: p. 110) . In this context art becomes an important tool that seeks to regain all aspects of the subject, such as emotion, creativity, intellectuality and perception during the educational process (Stoltz & Weger, 2012; Stoltz, 2016) . In this sense, Carlgren & Klingborg (2006) stress that:
When the characteristic expression of an animal is reproduced in clay or wood, when painting or drawing an effort is made to achieve the maximum that the material can give to the work intended, when, between audacity and test of patience, one works to form an image, the involvement of the entire personality is experienced. (Carlgren & Klingborg, 2006: p. 49)
With regard to the category “art as a means of expression” it can be seen that as a rule the students were provided with opportunities to create and express their feelings in relation to the contents studied. Through the element involving images, the students could combine both their feelings and their thoughts with the contents they studied. This is in keeping with the ideas of Duarte-Júnior (2012) . For this author, learning is a dialectic between what we feel and what we think. Therefore, by taking on expression through art, children can vent their feelings and emotions (Carlgren & Klingborg, 2006; Vygotsky, 2001, 2009) . This results in children being able to acquire better self-knowledge and develop autonomous and critical reasoning about that which is presented to them, given that for Steiner “children need pictorial language to nurture their psychological universe which, in the future, will become the basis of transformation into thought and formation of judgements” (Bach & Stoltz, 2014: p. 117) .
The main objective of this study was to analyze how art is expressed in everyday schooling using either conventional methods or Waldorf methods in order to identify what implications the artistic and creative element have for student development.
Based on the analysis of the data collected in both contexts it could be seen that in the school using conventional methods little space is reserved for creation and involvement with artistic activities, given that its teaching practices continue to be embedded in mechanicalness and the reproduction of contents. As a result, it was observed that the atmosphere in the classroom becomes tiresome for students and there is little contribution to their development.
On the other hand, the study also found signs that there are teachers who strive to use alternative methods in their teaching practices. Notwithstanding, they encounter difficulties in working with art and creation within traditional everyday schooling. It can therefore be said that education professionals need to be better prepared to work with art in the school environment.
This preparation can begin at the teacher training stage, by providing future teachers with greater knowledge about alternative teaching methods, such as Waldorf Education, given that this study points to this form of education as showing itself to be feasible and having many contributions to offer to traditional education.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Andrade Silva, D. A. de. (2015). Educação e ludicidade: um diálogo com a Pedagogia Waldorf [Education and Ludicity: A Dialogue with the Waldorf Pedagogy]. Educar em Revista, 56, 101-113.
|||Bach, J. (2007). Educação ecológica por meio da estética na Pedagogia Waldorf [Ecological education through aesthetics in the Waldorf Pedagogy] (p. 230). Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação), Curitiba: Setor de Ciências Humanas, Educação e Artes, Universidade Federal do Paraná.|
|||Bach, J., & Stoltz, T. (2014). Educação, arte e linguagem em Steiner e Vygotsky. In T. Stoltz, & M. Veiga (Eds.), O Pensamento de Rudolf Steiner no debate científico [The Thinking of Rudolf Steiner in the scientific debate] (pp. 113-132). Campinas: Alínea.|
|||Barbosa, F. M. B., & Pino-Juste, M. (2011). A estética como fator promotor da aprendizagem [The Aesthetics as a Promoter of Learning]. Teoria Educacion Salamanca, 23, 91-109.|
Barroco, S. M. S., & Superti, T. (2014). Vigotski e o estudo da psicologia da arte: contribuiçñes para o desenvolvimento humano [Vygotsky and the Study of Psychology of Art: Contribution for de Human Development]. Psicologia e sociedade, 26, 22-31.
|||Bergonski, S. S. S., & Stoltz, T. (2014). Arte e sua relação com a vida: Para além do entretenimento. In T. Stoltz, & M. Veiga (Eds.), O Pensamento de Rudolf Steiner no debate científico [The Thinking of Rudolf Steiner in the Scientific Debate] (pp. 133-164). Campinas: Alínea.|
|||Bodgan, R., & Biklen, S. (1994). Investigação qualitativa em educação: Uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos [Qualitative Research in Education: an Introduction to Theory and Methods]. Portugal: Porto Editora.|
Camargo, D. & Bulgacov, Y. L. M. (2008). A perspectiva estética e expressiva na escola: Articulando conceitos da psicologia sócio-histórica [The Aesthetic and Expressive Perspective in the School: Articulating Concepts of Socio-Historical Psychology]. Psicologia em estudo, 13, 467- 475.
|||Carlgren, F., & Klingborg, A. (2006). Educação para a liberdade: a pedagogia de Rudolf Steiner [Education for Freedom: The Pedagogy of Rudolf Steiner]. São Paulo: Escola Waldorf Rudolf Steiner.|
|||Duarte-Júnior, J. F. (1995). Fundamentos estéticos da educação [Aesthetic fundamentals of education] (4th ed.). Campinas: Papirus.|
|||Duarte-Júnior, J. F. (2010). O sentido dos sentidos: a educação (do) sensível [The Meaning of the Senses: Sensitive Education] (5th ed.). Curitiba: Criar Ediçñes UFPR.|
|||Duarte-Júnior, J. F. (2012). Por que arte-educação? [Why Art-Education?] (22nd ed.). São Paulo: Papirus editora.|
Eça, T. T. P. (2010). Educação através da arte para um futuro sustentável [Education through Art for a Sustainable Future]. Cadernos Cedes, Campinas, 30, 13-25.
Einser, E. (2008). O que pode a educação aprender das artes sobre a prática da educação? [What Can Education Learn from the Arts about the Practice of Education?] Curriculo sem fronteiras, Stanford, 8, 5-17.
|||Einser, E. (2013). Estrutura e mágica no ensino da Arte. In A. M. Barbosa (Ed.), Arte-Educação: leitura no subsolo [Art-Education: Reading Underground]. São Paulo: Cortez.|
|||Gil, A. C. (2010). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa [How to Design Research Projects]. São Paulo: Atlas.|
|||Magro, A. R. (2005). Arte educação: Necessidade ou superfuidade? [Art Education: Need or Superfine?] Colloquium Humanarum, 3, 23-26.|
|||Oliveira, M. C. S. L., & Telles, J. M. (2014). Aliando experiência estética e o debate de ideias: implicaçñes para as praticas educativas na escola. In M. A. Dessen, & D. A. Maciel (Eds.), A ciência do desenvolvimento humano: Desafios para a psicologia e a educação [The Science of Human Development: Challenges for Psychology and Education] (pp. 201-204). Curitiba: Juruá.|
|||Oliveira, M. E. (2010). Teatro na escola e caminhos de desenvolvimento humano: Processos afetivo-cognitivos de adolescentes [Theater at the School and Ways of Human Development: Affective-Cognitive Processes of Adolescents]. (p. 263). Dissertação de [Mestrado em Educação], Curitiba: Setor de Educação, Universidade Federal do Paraná.|
Pinheiro, M. L. (2014). A reflexão estética como ponto de partida para o entendimento da importância da arte na escola [The Aesthetic Reflection as a Starting Point for Understanding the Importance of Art in School]. EccoS Revista Científica, 35, 95-110.
|||Ponce, B. J., & Saul, A. A. (2012). A necessidade da estética e da ética no currículo escolar do século XXI [The Need for Aesthetics and Ethics in the School Curriculum of the 21st Century]. Psicologia da Educação, 34, 6-19.|
|||Sant’ana, H. L., Loos, R. S. S., & Cebulski, M. C. (2013). A arte, a afetividade e o sistema educacional: O desenvolvimento humano em questão [Art, Affectivity and the Educational System: The Human Development in Question). Pensamento Educacional, 8, 55-72.|
|||Schleder, K., & Stoltz, T. (2014). Arte só para artistas? Consideraçñes a partir de R. Steiner. In T. Stoltz, & M. Veiga (Eds.), O pensamento de Rudolf Steiner no debate científico [The Thinking of Rudolf Steiner in the Scientific Debate] (pp. 91-112). Campinas: Alínea.|
|||Severino, A. J. (2007). Metodologia do trabalho científico [Methodology of Scientific Work]. São Paulo: Cortez..|
|||Steiner, R. (2007). A educação da criança segundo a ciência espiritual [The Education of the Child According to Spiritual Science]. São Paulo: Antroposófica.|
|||Steiner, R. (2013). A arte de educar baseada na compreensão do ser humano [The Art of Educating Based on the Understanding of the Human Being]. São Paulo: Antroposófica, Federação das Escolas Waldorf no Brasil.|
|||Stoltz, T. (2016). Imaginação e criatividade na escola: A necessidade de outro olhar. In Piske et al. (Eds.), Altas habilidades/superdotação (AH/SD) e criatividade: identificação e atendimento [Giftedness and Creativity: identification and specialized service] (pp. 191-206). Curitiba: Juruá.|
Stoltz, T., & Weger, U. (2012). Piaget and Steiner: Science and Art in the Process of Formation. Research on Steiner Education, 3, 134-145.
Stoltz, T., & Weger, U. (2015). O pensar vivenciado na formação de professores [Experiential Thinking in Teacher Training]. Educar em Revista, 56, 67-83.
|||Veiga, M., & Stoltz, T. (2014). O pensamento de Rudolf Steiner no debate científico [The Thought of Rudolf Steiner in the Scientific Debate]. Campinas: Alínea.|
|||Vieira, T. C., & Castanho, M. E. (2008). A importância da arte na educação: Algumas reflexñes [The Importance of Art in Education: Some Reflections]. Teoria e Prática da Educação, 11, 75-78.|
|||Vygotsky, L. S. (2001). Psicologia da arte [Psychology of Art]. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.|
|||Vygotsky, L. S. (2009). Imaginação e criação na infância: Ensaios psicológicos-livro para professores [Imagination and Creation in Childhood: Psychological Essays-Book for Teachers]. São Paulo: Atica.|
|||Vygotsky, L. S. (2010). Psicologia Pedagógica [Pedagogical Psychology]. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.|
Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.