Share This Article:

Investigation on 226Ra, 238Th, 4040K and 137Cs Concentrations in Common Polishing Materials Consumed by Inhabitants in Saudi Arabia

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:304KB) PP. 1466-1472
DOI: 10.4236/jep.2016.711123    1,012 Downloads   1,364 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Knowledge of radioactivity present in polishing materials enables one to assess any possible radiological risks to human health. In this work, the radioactivity due to the presence of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K, and 37Cs has been measured in polishing materials con-sumed in Saudi Arabia using gamma spectrometry with HPGe. The activity concentra-tions of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs ranged from 13.61 ± 0.005 to 0.60 ± 0.002, 18.43 ± 0.003 to 0.78 ± 0.001, 342.59 ± 0.009 to 2.47 ± 0.001 and 1.47 ± 0.001 to 0.55 ± 0.001 Bq/l, respectively. For 226Ra and 40K, the highest values are measured in stainless steel polisher. The highest values also measured in metal polisher (copper-chrome) and disinfectant cleaner and polisher sample for 232Th and 137Cs. Radium equivalent activ-ity due to the natural radioactivity of the investigated samples ranged from 51.37 to 1.24 Bq/l. This value is less than the recommended values in the established standards. The evaluated data were compared with the literature data. Our results indicate that no significant radiological hazards arise from using investigated samples hence quite safe to be used as polishing materials.

1. Introduction

Naturally occurring radioisotopes (238Th, 232U series and 40K) are the main source of both external and internal radiation exposure in humans, whence the radiation finds its way into building materials, air, water, food, and eventually the human body. Human beings are exposed to external radiation from cosmic rays and terrestrial radiation. These isotopes enter the human body by intake from food and inhalation and result in exposure to internal radiation [1] [2] . According to the report by UNSCEAR, the total exposure per person resulting from ingestion of terrestrial radioisotopes was 0.3 mSv, of which 0.17 mSv comes from 40K and 0.12 mSv comes from thorium and uranium series. Exposure from inhalation of terrestrial radioisotopes contributes another 0.01 mSv. Thus, the internal dose of terrestrial radioisotopes can be estimated from the concentrations of natural radioisotopes in foods [3] . Internal radiation exposure, mainly affecting various levels of the respiratory tract, is due to the deposition of short lived progeny products of radon, which are exhaled from building material into indoor air [4] [5] . Radon (222Rn), a gaseous product of decay of 226Ra, is extremely important in an indoor exposure. Radon easily diffuses from the ground and building materials to indoor air and is the source of exposing bronchus and lungs [6] - [8] . The isotope 137Cs is produced anthropogenically by several types of nuclear activity, including past testing of nuclear weapons, accidents in nuclear facilities, reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear power reactors. All these materials contain some amount of natural radionuclides that cause exposure of people to ionizing radiation. The measurement of activity concentrations of radionuclides in polishing materials is important in the assessment of population exposures, as most individuals spend 80% of their time indoors [9] . Long exposures to low levels of ionizing radiation and poor ventilation of residential buildings can seriously increase health risks to polishing materials [10] . Polishing materials have a variety of chemical natures and some of them are toxic to humans and may cause sickness including cancers and death [11] . Even nontoxic polishing materials can pollute the land or water. Therefore, care needs to be exercised when using and disposing such materials [12] . The present study was undertaken with the purpose of determining natural radioactivity in some polishing materials. The data obtained are essential for the development of standards and guidelines concerning the use and management of polishing materials.

2. Sampling and Measurements

Twenty-two samples representing commercial species of the most commonly consumed polishing materials were collected from Saudi Arabia local market. They were being used for cleaning and polishing purposes of marble, granite, ceramic, tiles, stucco, brick, porcelain, chrome and metal, houses and vehicles. Weighed samples were stored in standard polyethylene Marinelli beakers of 650 cm3 volume each. The beakers were tightly sealed for 4 - 5 weeks to reach secular equilibrium where the rate of decay of the progeny becomes equal to that of the parent (radium and thorium) [13] . Table 1 shows samples description.

3. Gamma Spectrometric Measurements

The activity concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs were measured with gamma-spectrometric system based on HPGe. The samples were counted using a gamma spectrometry (Canberra coaxial-type Model GC2520) with relative efficiency of 25% and resolution FWHM of 0.2 keV for 1332.5 keV gamma-ray peak of 60Co and a peak to

Table 1. Sample code and their description.

Compton ratio of 50:1. The gamma-spectrometry system consists of HPGe connected to a desk top computer provided with a Canberra multichannel analyzer (MCA) in conjunction with a configuration software for spectrum acquisition and evaluation [14] [15] .

The specific activities were averaged from gamma-ray photo peaks at several energies. The gamma-ray lines at 295.2 and 351.9 keV from 214Pb and at 609.3 and 1764.5 keV from 214Bi were used to determine the specific activity of 226Ra. The gamma ray lines of 338.4 keV; 911.2 keV and 968.97 keV from 228Ac, the 238.58 keV and 727.3 keV from 212Bi and 583.2 keV from 208Tl were used to determine the specific activity of 232Th. The specific activities of 40K and 137Cs were measured directly by its own gamma-ray lines at 1460.8 and 661.66 keV, respectively [13] . The minimum detectable amount (BDLs) for 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs were 0.312 ± 0.16, 0.340 ± 0.16, 1.660 ± 1.10 and 0.45 ± 0.06 Bq/l respectively. Radioactivity concentrations of each sample were measured for about 23 h. The data acquisition, display and spectrum analysis were carried out using a dedicated software program [16] , which enabled also the concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K to be calculated. The degree of secular equilibrium reached between 226Ra and 232Th and their decay products was taken into account during the concentration calculations.

4. Results and Discussion

The specific activity of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs, in the samples are shown in Table 2. The highest average concentrations of 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs (13.60 ± 0.0015, 18.43 ± 0.0031, 342.59 ± 0.0091and 1.47 ± 0.0005 Bq/l respectively) were found in samples P5,

Table 2. Average of 226Ra,232Th, 40K and Raeq of polishing materials in the current study.

ND: Not detected.

P6, P5 and P8 respectively, whereas the lowest average concentrations 226Ra, 232Th, 40K and 137Cs (0.60 ± 0.0015, 0.78 ± 0.0011, 2.47 ± 0.0005, 0.55 ± 0.0008 Bq/l respectively) were found in samples P3, P17, P15 and P5. The 40K activity concentration dominated over that of the 226Ra and 232Th, as normally happens in samples, while the highest activity level of 40K (342 Bq/l) which was recorded in sample P5 was lower than that of the global average of 400 Bq∙kg−1 [17] .

The variation among the activity levels in different samples may be attributed to the pH, and chemical composition of the raw materials from which they derived [18] . Some studies present the concentration values of 226Ra only and do not consider the 238U presence taking into account the fact that 98.5% of the radiological effects of the uranium series are produced by radium and its daughters [19] .

The activity concentrations of Ra, presented here, fall within the range reported by other authors. Both Th and K in this work revealed higher concentration levels compared to those level for painting oxides and paints. However, their levels were lower than in the case of titanium enamel frits (Table 3). According to the recommended reference level of 30, 25 and 370 Bq/kg for 226Ra, 232Th and 40K, respectively, for the world average concentrations published by UNSCEAR [1] , it was noted that the obtained results in all samples are lower than the recommended reference level.

5. Radiological Parameters

Radium Equivalent Activities (Raeq)

Uniformity of the distribution of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K in materials with respect to radiation exposure has been described by a common index. This index is called the radium equivalent (Raeq) activity and is defined as a weighted sum of the activity concentrations of the above three radionuclides. Raeq is given in Bq∙l−1 to compare the specific activity of materials containing different amounts of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K. It was assumed that 370 Bq∙kg−1 of 226Ra, 259 Bq∙kg−1 of 232Th or 4810 Bq∙kg−1 of 40K produce the same γ-ray dose rates [20] ; Raeq is calculated through the following relationship:

(1)

where CRa, CTh, and CK are the specific activities of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K, respectively, expressed in Bq∙l−1. The maximum value of Raeq in building materials must be less than 370 Bq∙kg−1 for safe use of materials in the construction of buildings [1] , to keep the external dose below 1.5 mSv∙y−1 [21] . The results obtained by us showed that the lowest

Table 3. Comparison of concentrations range of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K (Bq∙kg−1) recorded in various polishing materials of several studies.

Raeq was equal to 1.24 Bq∙l−1 in sample P17, while the highest value reached 51.37 Bq∙l−1 in in sample P5 (Table 2). All the studied samples showed lower values than the recommended worldwide mean value 370 Bq kg−1. Thus, every material used to clean and polish of marble, granite, ceramic and tile can be considered to does not reveal a significant radiological hazard.

6. Conclusion

The activity levels of the natural terrestrial radionuclides as 226 Ra, 232 Th, 40K and artificial 137Cs were determined using a gamma-ray spectrometry in 22 samples of polishing materials collected from local stores. The obtained values were, in general, comparable to the corresponding ones obtained from other studies, and they all fell within the average worldwide ranges. Basing on the measurement results, the values of the radium equivalent activities Raeq were calculated to assess the radiological hazard for inhabitants of Jeddah. The obtained values displayed to be below the permissible limiting values.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Alharbi, W. (2016) Investigation on 226Ra, 238Th, 4040K and 137Cs Concentrations in Common Polishing Materials Consumed by Inhabitants in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Environmental Protection, 7, 1466-1472. doi: 10.4236/jep.2016.711123.

References

[1] UNSCEAR (2000) Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to General Assembly, Annex B Exposure from Natural Radiation Sources, United Nations, New York.
[2] Maxwell, O., Wagiran, H., Lee, S.K., Embong, Z. and Ugwuoke, P.E. (2015) Radioactivity Level and Toxic Elemental Concentration in Ground Water at Dei-Dei and Kubwa Areas of Abuja, North-Central Nigeria. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 107, 23-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.09.003
[3] Faanu, A., Adukpo, O.K., Tettey-Larbi, L., et al. (2016) Natural Radioactivity Levels in Soils, Rocks and Water at a Mining Concession of Perseus Gold Mine and Surrounding Towns in Central Region of Ghana. Springerplus, 5, 98.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-1716-5
[4] El-Taher, A. and Madkour, H.A. (2014) Environmental Studies and Radio-Ecological Impacts of Anthropogenic Areas: Shallow Marine Sediments Red Sea, Egypt. Journal of Isotopes in Environment and Health Studies, 50, 120-133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10256016.2013.826211
[5] Stoulos, S., Manolopoulou, M. and Papastefanou, C. (2003) Assessment of Natural Radiation Exposure and Radon Exhalation from Building Materials in Greece. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 69, 225-240.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(03)00081-X
[6] UNSCEAR (1988) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Report to the General Assembly, 32nd Session, United Nations, New York, 183-184.
[7] Stidley, C.A. and Samet, J.M. (1993) A Review of Ecological Studies of Lung-Cancer and Indoor Radon. Health Physics, 65, 234-251.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199309000-00001
[8] Alharbi, W.R. and Abbady, A.G.E. (2013) Measurement of Radon Concentrations in Soil and the Extent of Their Impact on the Environment from Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Natural Science, 5, 93-98.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ns.2013.51015
[9] UNSCEAR (1993) Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation.
[10] Guidotti, L., Carini, F., Rossi, R., Gatti, M., Cenci, R.M. and Beone, G.M. (2015) Gamma-Spectrometric Measurement of Radioactivity in Agricultural Soils of the Lombardia Region, Northern Italy. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 142, 36-44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.01.010
[11] El Aal, S.A., Korman, A., Stonert, A., Munnik, F. and Turos, A. (2009) Ion Beam Analysis of Ancient Egyptian Wall Paintings. Vacuum, 83, 54-58.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2009.01.012
[12] Adebamowo, E.O., Agbede, O.A., Sridhar, M.K.C. and Adebamowo, C.A. (2006) An Evaluation of Lead Levels in Paints for Residential Use Sold in the Nigerian Market. Indoor and Built Environment, 15, 551-554.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1420326X06072992
[13] Yussuf, N.M., Hossain, I. and Wagiran, H. (2012) Natural Radioactivity in Drinking and Mineral Water in Johor Bahru (Malaysia). Scientific Research and Essays, 7, 1070-1075.
[14] Sharma, N., Singh, J., Esakki, S.C. and Tripathi, R.M. (2016) A Study of the Natural Radioactivity and Radon Exhalation Rate in Some Cements Used in India and Its Radiological Significance. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 9, 47-56.
[15] Challan, M.B. and El-Taher, A. (2014) Analytical Approach for Radioactivity Correlation of Disc Sources with HPGe Detector Efficiency. Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 85, 23-27.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.11.087
[16] GENIE-2000 (1997) Basic Spectroscopy (Standalone) V1.2A Copyright (c), Canberra Industries.
[17] Mehra, R. (2009) Use of Gamma Ray Spectroscopy Measurements for Assessment of the Average Effective Dose from the Analysis of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in Soil Samples. Indoor Built Environ, 18, 270-275.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1420326X09104140
[18] Shanthi, G., Maniyan, C.G., Allan Gnana Raj, G. and Thampi Thanka Kumaran, J. (2009) Radioactivity in Food Crops from High Background Radiation Area in Southwest India. Current Science, 97, 1331-1335.
[19] Shousha, H.A. (2006) Radioactive Analysis and Radiological Hazards in Different Types of Egyptian Cement. Radiation Effects & Defects in Solids, 161, 615-627.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10420150600858371
[20] Beretka, J. and Mathew, P.J. (1985) Natural Radioactivity of Australian Building Materials, Industrial Wastes and By-Products. Health Physics, 48, 87-95.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004032-198501000-00007
[21] NEA-OECD (1979) Nuclear Energy Agency, Exposure to Radiation from Natural Radioactivity in Building Materials. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), Report by NEA Group of Experts, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, OECD, Paris, France.
[22] Amekudzie, A., Adukpo O., Annkah, J., Faanu, A. and Emi-Reynolds, G. (2011) Determination of 40K, 226Ra and 232Th Concentration and Radiation Dose Assessment in Titanium Enamel Frits Use in Polishing Household Utensils in Ghana. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 289, 795-800.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10967-011-1177-9
[23] Abel-Ghany, H.A. (2011) Radiation Hazard Assessment in Egyptian Painting Oxides. A Comparative Study. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 33, 225-234.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10653-010-9336-4
[24] Ali, K.K. (2012) Radioactivity in Building Materials in Iraq. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 148, 372-379.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncr033

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.