Share This Article:

Linguistic Methods to Detect Lies

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1102173    1,180 Downloads   1,820 Views  

ABSTRACT

The present manuscript mainly introduces three linguistic methods to detect lies, namely Hand-writing Analysis, Voice Stress Analysis, and Non-Verbal Analysis and the application of these linguistic deception detection approaches in various fields, such as law enforcement, intelligence agencies, and forensic context. These major deception detection techniques are illustrated by examples based on graphology, psycho-physiological stress response, and non-verbal communication studies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Ma, D. and Lin, D. (2015) Linguistic Methods to Detect Lies. Open Access Library Journal, 2, 1-7. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1102173.

References

[1] Ma, D.S. and Lin, D.A. (2015) Statement Analysis of Deception Detection. Open Access Library Journal, 2: e1975.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1101975
[2] De Paulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K. and Cooper, H. (2003) Cues to Deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
[3] Ekman, P. (2001) Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage. W.W. Norton, New York.
[4] Fitzpatrick, E. and Bachenko, J. (2009) Building a Forensic Corpus to Test Language-Based Indicators of Deception. Language and Computers, 71, 183-196.
[5] Fornaciari, T. and Poesio, M. (2013) Automatic Deception Detection in Italian Court Cases. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 21, 303-340.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-013-9140-4
[6] Hancock, J.T., Curry, L.E., Goorha, S. and Woodworth, M. (2007) On Lying and Being Lied to: A Linguistic Analysis of Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication. Discourse Process, 45, 1-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638530701739181
[7] Newman, M.L., Pennebaker, J.W., Berry, D.S. and Richards, J.M. (2003) Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665-675.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029005010
[8] Strapparava, C. and Mihalcea, R. (2009) The Lie Detector: Explorations in the Automatic Recognition of Deceptive Language. Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers, Singapore, 4 August 2009, 309-312.
[9] McClish, M. (2012) Don’t Be Deceived: The Definitive Book on Detection Deception. 2nd Edition, The Marpa Group, Inc., Winterville.
[10] Frank, M.G., Menasco, M.A. and O’Sullivan, M. (2008) Human Behavior and Deception Detection. In: Voeller, J.G., Ed., Handbook of Science and Technology for Homeland Security, Vol. 5, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470087923.hhs299
[11] Adam, S.H. (1996) Statement Analysis: What Do Suspects’ Words Really Reveal? FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 65, 12-20.
[12] Toma, C.L. and Hancock, J.T. (2012) What Lies Beneath: The Linguistic Traces of Deception in Online Dating Profiles. Journal of Communication, 62, 78-97.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01619.x
[13] Haddad, D., Walter, S., Ratley, R. and Smith, M. (2012) Investigation and Evaluation of Voice Stress Analysis Technology. U.S. Department of Justice.
[14] Pease, A. and Pease, B. (2004) The Definitive Book of Body Language. Pease International, Australia.
[15] Palmatier, J.J. (2011) Credibility Assessment: The CVSA, Polygraph, and Turstech/Vericator Voice Analysis Technologies.
http://www.nemesysco.com/JJP-research_Full.pdf
[16] Palmatier, J.J. and Rovner, L. (2015) Credibility Assessment: Preliminary Process Theory, the Polygraph Process, and Construct Validity. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 95, 3-13.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.001
[17] Palmatier, J.J. and Rovner, L. (2015) Rejoinder to Commentary on Palmatier and Rovner (2014): Credibility Assessment: Preliminary Process Theory, the Polygraph Process, and Construct Validity. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 95, 31-34.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.11.009

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.