Share This Article:

Unified Theory of Everything and QQD

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1102000    534 Downloads   1,119 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

The fully Unified Theory of {Strong, EM, Weak, Gravity} interactions all arising from the unique source of electronic charges has been established. The theory proves that the Nature is astutely simple in essence, and the most of the recently promoted circuitous physics seem to be incorrect in the new light. In the proposed theory, the 100% of matter and energy content of the Universe, including the dark matter and energy, is predicted in terms of a single integer parameter L in one-to-one agreement with the observation. To boot, the {Z, W} bosons are proven to be compound states with their innate heavy masses; they never have been zero-mass particles, and the Higgs boson is uncalled for. The unified theory also has explicated the ever mysterious strong interaction number “137”, and leads to QQD (Quantum Quark Dynamics) parallel to the QED. The QQD gives, for example, very simple explanation of “Asymptotic Freedom” without requiring the unwarranted and arduously complex QCD.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Suh, P. (2015) Unified Theory of Everything and QQD. Open Access Library Journal, 2, 1-17. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1102000.

References

[1] Lederman, L. (2004) God Particles. Houghton Mifflin, New York.
[2] Chechelnitsky, A.M. (2000) Mystery of the Magic Number “137”: Wave Genesis, Theoretical Representation, Role in the Universe. arXiv:physics/0011035
[3] Suh, P.K. (2013) Physics of the Universe in New Perspective. International Journal of Recent Advancement in Physics, 2, 1.
[4] Suh, P.K., Stauber, M. and Heonig, M. (2013) Dark Matter and Energy in Symmetric Dual Universe. International Journal of Recent Advancement in Physics, 2, 55.
[5] Suh, P.K. (2011) The Symmetric Physics of the Universe. Apeiron, 18, 84.
[6] Turok, N. (2013) Perimeter Institute and the Crisis in Modern Physics.
[7] Lykken, J. and Spiropulu, M. (2014) Supersymmetry and the Crisis in Physics. Scientific American, 310, 36-39.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0514-34
[8] Bohm, D. (1989) Quantum Theory. Dover Publication, New York.
[9] Chen, F. (1974) Introduction to Plasma Physics. Plenum Press, New York.
[10] Wikipedia (2013) Quantum Entanglement.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement
[11] Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M. (1971) The Classical Theory of Field. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
[12] Abbas, A. (2000) Quantum Entanglement and Quantum Chromodynamics. arXiv:Physics/0006044v1[physics.gen.-pl]
[13] Beringer, J., et al. (Particle Data Group) (2012) Review of Particle Physics. Physical Review D, 86, Article ID: 010001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.010001
[14] Ford, K. (2011) 101 Quantum Questions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674060937
[15] Lederman, L. and Hill, C. (2013) Beyond the God Particle. Prometheus Book, New York.
[16] T. Spillane, et al. (2007) The 198Au Beta(-) Half-Life in the Metal Au. European Physical Journal A, 21, 203.
[17] Yue, A.T., Dewey, M.S., Gilliam, D.M., Greene, G.L., Laptev, A.B., Nico, J.S., Snow, W.M. and Wietfeldt, F.E. (2013) Improved Determination of Neutron Lifetime. Physical Review Letters, 111, Article ID: 222501.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.222501
[18] Bai, Y., Barger, A.J., Barger, V., Lu, R., Peterson, A.D. and Salvado, J. (2014) Neutrino Lighthouse at Sagittarius A. Physical Review D, 90, Article ID: 063012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.063012
[19] Ent, R., Ullrich, T. and Venugopala, R. (2015) The Glue That Binds Us. Scientific American, 312, 42-49.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0515-42
[20] Trefil, J. (1994) From Atoms to Quarks. Doubleday, New York.
[21] Belyaev, A., Brown, M.S., Foadi, R. and Frandsen, M.T. (2014) Technicolor Higgs Boson in the Light of LHC Data. Physical Review D, 90, Article ID: 035012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.035012
[22] Aaltonen, T., et al. (2015) An Analysis of Data from the New Shuttered Tevatron Excludes. Physical Review Letters, 114, Article ID: 151802.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.151802
[23] Strassler, M. (2011) What’s Proton, Anyway?
[24] Thomas, A.W. (2008) Interplay of Spin and Orbital Coupling Momentum in Proton. Physical Review Letters, 101, Article ID: 102003.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.102003
[25] Krisch, A. (2007) Hard Collisions of Spinning Proton, Past, Present, and Future. The European Physical Journal A, 31, 417-423.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2006-10232-4
[26] Bernauer, J. and Pohl, R. (2014) The Proton Radius Problem. Scientific American, 310, 32-39.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0214-32
[27] Grossman, L. (2013) Shrinking Proton Puzzle Persists in New Measurement. New Scientist.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.