Share This Article:

Reliability of Kinovea Computer Program in Measuring Cervical Range of Motion in Sagittal Plane

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1101916    1,022 Downloads   1,952 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Purpose: This study was conducted to investigate the intrarater and interrater reliability of Kinovea computer program in measuring cervical range of motion in sagittal plane in healthy subjects. Subjects: Sixty-five normal physical therapy intern students participated in this study. Their age ranged from 20 - 24 years with mean (22.42 ± 0.84) and BMI mean (28.60 ± 1.40). Materials and Methods: Digital camera and labtop with installed Kinovea software were used. The cervical ROM of flexion and extension for each participant were measured by Kinovea computer program three times by examiner (B) to detect the intrarater reliability and by three examiners (A, B and C) to detect the interrater reliability. Results: For the intrarater reliability, the ICC between the first and second trials by Rater B for flexion and extension were 0.985 and 0.995. The ICC between the second and third trials were 0.932 and 0.993. The ICC between the first and third trials were 0.920 and 0.986 respectively. For the interrater reliability, the ICC between Rater A & B for flexion and extension were 0.991 and 0.992. The ICC between Rater A & C were 0.988 and 0. 9938. The ICC between Rater B & C were 0.993 and 0.997 respectively. Kinovea computer program had an excellent intrarater and interrater reliability in measuring cervical flexion and extension range of motion at P < 0.05. Conclusion: The Kinovea software program was reliable in both intrarater and interrater reliability in measuring cervical range of motion in sagittal plane.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Elwardany, S. , El-Sayed, W. and Ali, M. (2015) Reliability of Kinovea Computer Program in Measuring Cervical Range of Motion in Sagittal Plane. Open Access Library Journal, 2, 1-10. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1101916.

References

[1] Buskila, D., Sarzi-Puttini, P. and Ablin, J.N. (2007) The Genetics of Fibromyalgia Syndrome. Pharmacogenomics, 8, 67-74.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/14622416.8.1.67
[2] Guzmán, C., Valdivia, A., Blanco, O., Oliver-Salazar, M.A. and Carrera-Escobedo, J.L. (2013) Therapeutic Motion Analysis of Lower Limbs Using Kinovea. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), 3.
[3] Gajdosik, R.L. and Bohannon, R.W. (1987) Clinical Measurement of Range of Motion: Review of Goniometry Emphasizing Reliability and Validity. Physical Therapy, 67, 1867-1872.
[4] Abd EL-Reheem, R.M., Kamel, R.M. and Ali, M.F. (2015) Reliability of Using Kinovea Program in Measuring Dominant Wrist Joint Range of Motion. Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 10, 224-230.
[5] Abass, S. and Abdulhassan, Z. (2013) Kinematic Analysis of Human Climbing up and Down Stairs at Different Inclinations. Eng.&Tech. Journal, 31.
[6] Laflamme, Y.T., Boutin, N., Dion, N.A. and Vallée, C.A. (2013) Reliability and Criterion Validity of Two Applications of the iPhone to Measure Cervical Range of Motion in Healthy Participants. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 10, 69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-69
[7] Williams, M.A., McCarthy, C.J., Chorti, A., Cooke, M.W. and Gates, S. (2010) A Systematic Review of Reliability and Validity Studies of Methods for Measuring Active and Passive Cervical Range of Motion. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 33, 138-155.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.12.009
[8] Dawood, R.S., Kattabei, O.M., Nasef, S.A., Battarjee, K.A. and Abdelraouf, O.R. (2013) Effectiveness of Kinesio Taping versus Cervical Traction on Mechanical Neck Dysfunction. International Journal of Therapies and Rehabilitation Research, 2.
[9] Mahgoub, M.S., Abd El-Aziz, H.G., Saleh, A.M. and Hegazy, M.O. (2013) Efficacy of Kinesio Taping versus Phonophoresis on Mechanical Neck Dysfunction. International Journal of Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Research, 01, 0128-0134.
[10] Olson, S.L., O’Connor, D. P., Birmingham, G., Broman, P. and Herrera, L. (2000) Tender Point Sensitivity, Range of Motion, and Perceived Disability in Subjects with Neck Pain. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 30, 13-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2000.30.1.13
[11] Youdas, J.W., Carey, J.R. and Garrett, T.R. (1991) Reliability of Measurements of Cervical Sspine Range of Motion—Comparison of Three Methods. Physical Therapy, 71, 98-104.
[12] Severinsson, Y., Elisson, L. and Bunketorp, O. (2012) Reliability of Measuring the Cervical Sagittal Translation Mobility with a Simple Method in a Clinical Setting. Rehabilitation Research and Practice, 2012, Article ID: 629104.
[13] Tousignant, M., de Bellefeuille, L., O’Donoughue, S. and Grahovac, S. (2000) Criterion Validity of the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Goniometer for Cervical Flexion and Extension. Spine, 25, 324-330.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200002010-00011
[14] Burns, D.K. and Wells, M.R. (2006) Gross Range of Motion in the Cervical Spine: The Effects of Osteopathic Muscle Energy Technique in Asymptomatic Subjects. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 106, 137-142.
[15] Fleiss, J.L. (1986) Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. Willey, New York.
[16] Tousignant, M., Boucher, N., Bourbonnais, J., Gravelle, T., Quesnel, M. and Brosseau, L. (2001) Intratester and Intertester Reliability of the Cybex Electronic Digital Inclinometer (EDI-320) for Measurement of Active Neck Flexion and Extension in Healthy Subjects. Manual Therapy, 6, 235-241.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/math.2001.0419
[17] Tucci, S.M., Hicks, J.E., Gross, E.G., et al. (1986) Cervical Motion Assessment: A New, Simple and Accurate Method. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 67, 225-230.
[18] Trew, L.M. and Meyer, E.R. “Effect of a Dynamic Seating Surface on Postural Control and Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy”—Experiences Gained and Lessons Learned; Using SPCM, Pressure Mapping and Videography, M.Sc., PT 6, 441-447.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.