Share This Article:

Anchoring Heuristic Messes with Inflation Targeting

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:1475KB) PP. 1-10
DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1101450    828 Downloads   1,145 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

We evaluate recent inflation-targeting using Brazilian data and also consider the framework of the macroeconomic model of adaptive learning blended with a cognitive psychology approach. We suggest that forecasters interpret the inflation target as an anchor, and adjust to it accordingly. As current inflation increases above the target level, a central bank loses credibility, and forecasters start the adjustment from the top because they expect an even higher future inflation. Then, they move back to the core target within a range of uncertainty, but the adjustment is likely to end before the core is reached, as predicted by the psychological theory of anchors. After calibrating the model, we find an asymptotic equilibrium of a 6.1 percent inflation rate, which overshoots the announced target inflation core of 4.5 percent. This example casts doubt on the very justification for inflation targeting, which is unlikely to succeed when private forecasters rely on anchoring heuristics.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Da Silva, E. and Da Silva, S. (2015) Anchoring Heuristic Messes with Inflation Targeting. Open Access Library Journal, 2, 1-10. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1101450.

References

[1] Bernanke, B.S. and Mishkin, F.S. (1997) Inflation Targeting: A New Framework for Monetary Policy? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 97-116.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.11.2.97
[2] Goncalves, C.E. and Salles, J.M. (2008) Inflation Targeting in Emerging Economies: What Do the Data Say? Journal of Development Economics, 85, 312-318.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.07.002
[3] Ball, L. and Sheridan, N. (2003) Does Inflation Targeting Matter? NBER Working Paper No. 9577.
[4] Thomas, L.B. (1999) Survey Measures of Expected U.S. Inflation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13, 125-144.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.13.4.125
[5] Evans, G.W. and Honkapohja, S. (2001) Learning and Expectations in Macroeconomics. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
[6] Conlisk, J. (1996) Why Bounded Rationality? Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 669-700.
[7] Benveniste, A., Metivier, M. and Priouret, P. (1990) Adaptive Algorithms and Stochastic Approximations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75894-2
[8] Anufriev, M. and Hommes, C. (2012) Evolution of Market Heuristics. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 27, 255-271.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0269888912000161
[9] Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux. New York.
[10] Jacowitz, K.E. and Kahneman, D. (1995) Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1161-1666.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01461672952111004
[11] Sicsu, J. (2002) Expectativas Inflacionárias no Regime de Metas de Inflaç ão: Uma Análise Preliminar do Caso Brasileiro. Economia Aplicada, 6, 703-711.
[12] Mankiw, N.G., Reis, R. and Wolfers, J. (2003) Disagreement about Inflation Expectations. NBER Working Paper No. 9796.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.417602
[13] Mandelbrot, B. and Taleb, N.N. (2010) Mild vs. Wild Randomness: Focusing on Those Risks That Matter. In: Diebold, F.X., Doherty, N.A. and Herring, R.J., Eds., The Known, the Unknown and the Unknowable in Financial Institutions: Measurement and Theory Advancing Practice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 47-58.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.