Share This Article:

Faith-Based Organizations-State Relation and the Democratization Process in Kenya

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1101416    793 Downloads   1,191 Views  
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

This article examines how Faith-Based Organizations (FBOs)-state relation influences the democratization process in Kenya. Ideally, the state should be in the forefront in nurturing the democratization process. However, evidence suggests that the Kenyan state has for a long time appeared as an unwilling participant in the democratization process. Instead, the Kenyan state has refused to let go of the old system of governance associated with restricted political freedoms, ethnic discrimination, human rights abuse and grand official corruption, among others. It is the failure by the state to lead from the front that has created an enabling environment for the participation of FBOs (an element of civil society) in the democratization process. Ideally FBOs step in to act as a check and balance against the excesses of the state. It is argued that FBOs-state relation can be explained in terms of either cooperation or hostility. A major argument is that the contribution of FBOs to the democratization process is higher when the relationship between FBOs and the state is hostile. FBOs’ contribution to the democratization process is the lowest when the relationship between FBOs and the state is cordial (cooperation).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Owuoche, S. (2015) Faith-Based Organizations-State Relation and the Democratization Process in Kenya. Open Access Library Journal, 2, 1-11. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1101416.

References

[1] Kanyinga, K. (2015) Evolution of Kenya’s Civil Society. Sunday Nation, 1 March 2015.
[2] Hegel, F. (1988) Introduction to the Philosophy of History: With an Appendix from the Philosophy of Rights. Hachett Pub. Co. Inc., New York.
[3] Owuoche, S. (2011) Faith Based Organizations and the Institutionalization of Democracy in Kenya: A Case Study of the National Council of Churches of Kenya. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Nairobi.
[4] Keane, J. (1988) Democracy and Civil Society. Verso, London.
[5] Owuoche, S. (2010) The Church in the Struggle for Democracy in Kenya. Mvule Africa Publishers, Nairobi.
[6] Diamonds, L. (1999) Developing Democracy: Towards Consolidation. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
[7] Filali-Ansary, A. (2003) Muslims and Democracy. In: Diamonds, L., Plattner, M.F. and Brumberg, D., Eds., Islam and Democracy in the Middle East, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 28-46.
[8] Huntington, S. (1984) Will More Countries be Democratic? Political Science Quarterly, 99, 193-218.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2150402
[9] Throup, D. and Hornsby, C. (1995) Multiparty Politics in Kenya: The Kenyatta and Moi States and the Thriumph of the System in the 1992 Election. James Currey, Oxford.
[10] Mamdani, M. (1995) A Critique of the State and Civil Society Paradigm in Africanist Studies. In: Mamdani, M. and Wamba-dia-Wamba, E., Eds., African Studies in Social Movements and Democracy, Codesria, Oxford, 602-616.
[11] Machiavelli, N. (1952) The Prince. Mentor Books, New York.
[12] Sibley, M. (1996) Political Ideas and Ideologies: A History of Political Thought. Surjeet Publishers, Delhi.
[13] Kenya Elections Domestic Observation Forum (2008) The Kenya Elections 2007: Losses, Gains and Lessons. KEDOF, Nairobi.
[14] Sunday Nation (2007) “Used and Dumped: That’s Civil Society”, by Makau Mutua. Sunday Nation, 15 April 2007.
[15] Daily Nation (2006) “The Church Speaks” by Nation Reporter. Daily Nation, 23 September 2006.
[16] The Muslim Minority Huge Challenges by Abdulkarim Mohamed Jimale, Freelance Journalist, Kenya.
www.onislam.net/english/politics/africa/427664.html
[17] Daily Nation (2006) “CIPK/ SUPKEM Reacts” by Nation Reporter. Daily Nation, 9 January 2006.
[18] Daily Nation (2009) Press Release Advertisement. Daily Nation, 19 March 2009.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.