No-Cloning Theorem, Leibniz’s Principle, and the Notion of Uniqueness

Qiankai Yao^1,2, Bin Zhang², Yanwei Luo¹, Hui Huang¹

¹College of Science, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, China.
²International Joint Research Laboratory for Quantum Functional Materials of Henan, School of Physics and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1100981                

Abstract

The impossibility of cloning an unknown quantum state is one of the basic rules governing quantum physics. This statement, known as the “no-cloning theorem”, prohibits perfect cloning, but doesn’t oppose approximate copying. In this paper, we will prove that, due to the uncontrollable quantum fluctuations, no perfect cloning can be achieved. Such a situation allows us to treat the no-cloning theorem as an equivalent one to Leibniz’s principle, and further unify them under the notion of uniqueness; that is, any physical entities (whether macroscopic or microscopic objects) in nature would have its individuality. Moreover, we also demonstrate the universality of unique scheme by showing that, any process of trying to construct one exactly symmetrical or asymmetrical body of a physical object is forbidden. On the whole, nature doesn’t allow the existence of completely identical, symmetrical or asymmetrical things and this conclusion is valid for all physical domains.

Keywords

No-Cloning Theorem, Leibniz’s Principle, Uniqueness

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Wootters, W.K. and Zurek, W.H. (1982) A Single Quantum Cannot Be Cloned. Nature, 299, 802-803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/299802a0
[2]	Dieks, D. (1982) Communication by EPR Devices. Physics Letters A, 92, 271-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(82)90084-6
[3]	Linares, A.L., Simon, C., Howell, J.C. and Bouwmeester, D. (2002) Experimental Quantum Cloning of Single Photons. Science, 296, 712-714. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1068972
[4]	Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G. and Mermin, N.D. (1992) Quantum Cryptography without Bell’s Theorem. Physical Review Letters, 68, 557-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.557
[5]	Mor, T. (1998) No Cloning of Orthogonal States in Composite Systems. Physical Review Letters, 80, 3137-3140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3137
[6]	Fuchs, C.A. and Peres, A. (1996) Quantum-State Disturbance versus Information Gain: Uncertainty Relations for Quantum Information. Physical Review A, 53, 2038-2045. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2038
[7]	Cortes, A. (1976) Leibniz’s Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles: A False Principle. Philosophy of Science, 43, 491-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/288707
[8]	Barnette, L. (1978) Does Quantum Mechanics Disprove the Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles. Philosophy of Science, 45, 466-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/288822
[9]	Castellani, E. and Mittelstaedt, P. (2000) Leibniz’s Principle, Physics, and the Language of Physics. Foundations of Physics, 30, 1587-1604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026489931449
[10]	Daffertshofer, A., Plastino, A.R. and Plastino, A. (2002) Classical No-Cloning Theorem. Physical Review Letters, 88, 210601-210604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.210601
[11]	Ramanathan, R. (2012) Complementarity of Quantum Correlations. Thesis for the Doctor Degree, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
[12]	Wootters, W.K. and Zurek, W.H. (2009) The No-Cloning Theorem. Physics Today, 2, 76-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3086114
[13]	Herbert, N. (1982) Superluminal Communication Based upon a New Kind of Quantum Measurement. Foundations of Physics, 12, 1171-1179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00729622
[14]	Scarani, V., Iblisdir, S., Gisin, N. and Acin, A. (2005) Quantum Cloning. Reviews of Modern Physics, 77, 1225-1256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.77.1225
[15]	Cerf, N.J., Lévy, C.N. and Assche, G.V. (2001) Quantum Distribution of Gaussian Keys Using Squeezed States. Physical Review A, 63, Article ID: 052311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.63.052311
[16]	Muller, F.A. and Seevinck, M.P. (2009) Discerning Elementary Particles. Philosophy of Science, 76, 179-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/647486
[17]	Teller, P. (1983) Quantum Physics, the Identity of Indiscernibles, and Some Unanswered Questions. Philosophy of Science, 50, 309-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/289112
[18]	Giuntini, R. and Mittelstaedt, P. (1989) The Leibniz Principle in Quantum Logic. International Journal of Theoretical physics, 28, 159-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00669807