An Approach for Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation at Gas-HFO Internal Combustion Engines in a Central Station

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1100765   PDF        1,289 Downloads   1,701 Views  


This paper applies the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) as an assessment tool to quantify the environmental impacts associated with electricity generation by internal combustion engines. Steps, resources and/or supplies that have the greatest impacts during the life cycle of electricity generation are identified to contribute with measures of cleaner production in companies with similar power generation. The goal of this study is to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with the production of 1552 kWh of electricity by gas-HFO internal combustion engines, considering a scenario that responds to use of lubricating oil, oily water treatment, collection and transportation of sludge. The study of additives and contaminants from lubricating oil is included, taking into account that it is a complex task for life cycle inventory considering limitations to get data. Arising from the use of the program SimaPro we get that the greatest impact are the lubricating oil use and transport on respiration of inorganic products and the use of fossil fuels. Most environmental impacts are concentrated in the use of lubricating oil and transportation.

Share and Cite:

Touset, J. , Leite, J. , Rico, I. , França, A. , Dominguez, E. , de Assis Guedes, O. , Jimenez, I. , Artiles, A. and Gil, M. (2014) An Approach for Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation at Gas-HFO Internal Combustion Engines in a Central Station. Open Access Library Journal, 1, 1-12. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1100765.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Skrotski, B. and Vopat, W. (1960) Power Station Engineering and Economy. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, 751 p.
[2] Bai, L. (2012) Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Generation from Low Temperature Waste Heat. The Influence of Working Fluid. Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
[3] Wissol Autoexpress (2012) About Lubricants. Online. Accessed: 2012-1-18.
[4] UPC ( 2012) ACV. Estado del conocimiento. 29-41, Online. Accessed 2012-2-3.
[5] Boughton, B. (2004) Environmental Assessment of Used Oil Management Methods. Environmental Science & Technology, 38, 353-358.
[6] EPEM (2012) Innovative Collection System and Life Cycle Assessment for Waste Lube Oils. Task 6: Life Cycle Assessment—Conclusions. Innovative Collection System and Life Cycle Assessment for Waste Lube Oils LIFE02 ENV/ GR/000360. Online. Accessed 2012-1-10.
[7] Wardenaar, T., et al. (2012) Differences between LCA for analysis and LCA for policy: A Case Study on the Consequences of Allocation Choices in Bio-Energy Policies. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17, 1059-1067.
[8] Ekvall, T. and Tillman, A. (1997) Open-Loop Recycling: Criteria for Allocation Procedures. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2, 155-162.
[9] Finnveden, G. and Lindfors, L. (1998) Data Quality of Life Cycle Inventory Data—Rules of Thumb. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 3, 65-66.
[10] WEC (2004) Comparison of Energy Systems Using Life Cycle Assessment. World Energy Council. Accessed: 2013-4-20.
[11] Kopelioivich, D. (2012) Additives in Lubricating Oils. (online).
[12] Raimondi, A., Girotti, G., Blengini, G.A. and Fino, D. (2012) LCA of Petroleum-Based Lubricants: State of Art and Inclusion of Additives. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17, 987-996.
[13] Boustead Model 5.0 (2005) Operating Manual. Boustead Consulting Ltd., Horsham.
[14] Ecoinvent (2006) Life Cycle Inventories of Chemicals—Ecoinvent Report No. 8. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Zürich and Dübendorf.
[15] European Commission (2010) ELCD Core Database Version II.
[16] Fehrenbach, H. (2005) Ecological and Energetic Assessment of Rerefining Used Oils to Base Oils: Substitution of Primarily Produced Base Oils Including Semi-Synthetic and Synthetic Compounds. Institut für Energieund Umweltforschung GmbH (IFEU), a Study Commissioned by GEIR-Groupement Européen de l’Industrie de la Régénération. [online]
[17] Ekman, A. and Börjesson, P. (2011) Life Cycle Assessment of Mineral Oil-Based and Vegetable Oil-Based Hydraulic Fluids Including Comparison of Biocatalytic and Conventional Production Methods. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16, 297-305.
[18] Contreras, A.M., Rosa, E., Pérez, M., Van Langenhove, H. and Dewulf, J. (2009) Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Four Alternatives for Using By-Products of Cane Sugar Production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 772-779.
[19] Goedkoop, M. and Spriensma, R. (2001) The Eco-Indicator’99. A Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Methodology Report. 3rd Edition, PRé Consultants, Amersfoort.
[20] Pérez, M. (2009) Evaluación ambiental del proceso de cogeneración con bagazo en la Industria Azucarera Cubana mediante el Análisis del Ciclo de Vida. Tesis presentada en opción al grado científico de Máster, Universidad Central de Las Villas, Santa Clara.
[21] Pérez, M., Contreras, A.M., et al. (2013) Life Cycle Assessment of the Cogeneration Processes in the Cuban Sugar Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41, 222-231.
[22] PRé Consultants (2004) SimaPro End User License Agreement (EULA) and Service Level Agreement (SLA).
[23] MICROLAB (2012) Relatório analítico RA 173/12.
[24] LUBRAX-PETROBRAS (2011) Ficha técnica MARBRAX CCD.
[25] FDSPQ (2011) Ficha de Datos de Seguridad de Producto Químico MARBRAX CCD.
[26] TRIBOLAB (2012) Relatório de exame. Lub: MARBRAX CCD 430/440.
[27] Intertek (2011) Relatório de análise óleo combustível 1A. GERA-Geradora de Energia, Candeias.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.