Share This Article:

Cosmic Redshift, Temperature, Growth Rate and Age in Stoney Scale Black Hole Cosmology

Abstract PP. 1-16
DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1100613    1,663 Downloads   1,968 Views   Citations

ABSTRACT

Throughout the cosmic evolution, currently believed cosmic “critical density” can be shown to be a default result of the “positively curved” light speed rotating black hole universe “mass density”. As there is no observational or experimental evidence to Friedmann’s second assumption, the density classification scheme of Friedmann cosmology must be reviewed at fundamental level and possibly can be relinquished. With cosmic light speed rotation galactic rotational curves can be understood. The observed cosmic redshift can be reinterpreted as an index of “cosmological” thermodynamic light emission mechanism. Clearly speaking during cosmic evolution, at any time in the past, in hydrogen atom—emitted photon energy was always inversely proportional to the cosmic temperature. Thus past light emitted from older galaxy’s excited hydrogen atom will show redshift with reference to the current laboratory data. Note that there will be no change in the energy of the emitted photon during its journey from the distant galaxy to the observer. Past high cosmic temperature may be the root cause of observed super novae dimming. By considering the “Stoney mass” as the initial mass of the baby cosmic black hole, past and current physical and thermal parameters (like angular velocity, growth rate, age, redshift, thermal energy density and matter density) of the cosmic black hole can be understood. For a past cosmic temperature of 3000 K, obtained redshift is 1100. From now onwards, CMBR temperature can be called as “Comic Black Hole’s Thermal Radiation” temperature and can be expressed as “CBHTR” temperature. Current cosmic black hole is growing at a rate of 14.66 km/sec in a decelerating mode. In view of the confirmed zero rate of change, the current CMBR temperature (from satellite data) and zero rate of change in the current Hubble’s constant (from satellite data), it can be suggested that, current cosmic expansion is almost all saturated and at present there is no significant cosmic acceleration. From microscopic physics point of view, can be considered as a true index of future cosmic rate of expansion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Seshavatharam, U. and Lakshiminarayana, S. (2014) Cosmic Redshift, Temperature, Growth Rate and Age in Stoney Scale Black Hole Cosmology. Open Access Library Journal, 1, 1-16. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1100613.

References

[1] Seshavatharam, U.V.S. and Lakshminarayana, S. (2014) Basics of Black Hole Cosmology—First Critical Scientific Review. Physical Science International Journal, 4, 842-879.
[2] Friedmann, A. (1999) On the Curvature of Space. General Relativity and Gravitation, 31, 1991-2000.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026751225741
[3] Zhang, T.X. and Frederic, C. (2013) Acceleration of Black Hole Universe. Astrophysics and Space Science, 349, 567-573.
[4] Poplawski, N.J. (2010) Radial motion into an Einstein-Rosen bridge. Physics Letters B, 687, 110-113.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.029
[5] Hubble, E.P. (1929) A Relation between Distance and Radial Velocity among Extra-Galactic Nebulae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 15, 168-173.
[6] Hubble, E.P. (1947) The 200-Inch Telescope and Some Problems It May Solve. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 59, 153-167.
[7] Hawking, S.W. (1988) A Brief History of Time. Bantam Dell Publishing Group, New York.
[8] Stoney, G.J. (1881) On the Physical Units of Nature. Philosophical Magazine, 11, 381-391.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786448108627031
[9] Beringer, J., et al. (2012) Particle Data Group. Physical Review D, 86, 010001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.010001
[10] (2011) The Accelerating Universe. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics. www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2011/advanced-physicsprize2011.pdf
[11] Spergel, D.N., et al. Planck Data Reconsidered.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.3313.pdf
[12] Narlikar, J.V. (2002) Introduction to Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[13] Brownstein, J.R. and Moffat, J.W. (2006) Galaxy Rotation Curves Without Non-Baryonic Dark Matter. The Astrophysical Journal, 636, 721-741.
[14] Chadwick, E.A., et al. (2013) A Gravitational Theoretical Development Supporting MOND. Physical Review D, 88, 024036.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.