Jordanian EFL Teachers’ Awareness and Incorporation of Multiple Intelligences into Their Pedagogical Practices

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1100327   PDF        1,293 Downloads   2,220 Views   Citations


This study attempts to explore EFL teachers’ awareness and incorporation of the Multiple Intelligences Theory (MIT) into their pedagogical practices in light of some variables. The sample consisted of 141 male and female EFL teachers who taught the first-, fourth-, eighth- and eleventh- grade Action Pack textbooks in the public schools of the First Directorate of Education (Irbid, Jordan). The findings revealed that, albeit moderate, EFL teachers' awareness and incorporation of MIT is influenced, to various degrees, by gender, grade level, age, qualifications, experience and training.

Share and Cite:

Al-Omari, T. and Bataineh, R. (2014) Jordanian EFL Teachers’ Awareness and Incorporation of Multiple Intelligences into Their Pedagogical Practices. Open Access Library Journal, 1, 1-22. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1100327.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Levitt, K.E. (2002) An Analysis of Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs Regarding the Teaching and Learning of Science. Science Education, 86, 1-22.
[2] Bataineh, R.F., Bataineh, R.F. and Thabet, S.S. (2011) EFL Teachers’ Knowledge of and Classroom Subscription to Communicative Language Teaching: Embraced or Lip-Serviced? Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2, 859-866.
[3] Beck, J., Czerniak, C. and Lumpe, A. (2000) An Exploratory Study of Teachers’ Belief Regarding the Implementation of Constructivism in their Classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 323-343.
[4] Haney, J. and McArthur, J. (2002) Four Case Studies of Prospective Science Teachers’ Beliefs Concerning Constructivist Teaching Practices. Science Education, 86, 783-802.
[5] Pajares, F. (1992) Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning up a Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332.
[6] Roehrig, G. and Kruse, R. (2005) The Role of Teachers’ Beliefs and Knowledge in the Adoption of a Reform-Based Curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 105, 412-422.
[7] Williams, M. and Burden, R. (1997) Psychology for Language Teachers: A Social Constructivist Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[8] Kampylis, P. (2010) Fostering Creative Thinking: The Role of Primary Teachers. Jyväskylä Studies in Computing, 115, 171 p.
[9] Bataineh, R.F., Al Omari, T.M. and Smadi, O.M. (Forthcoming) The Inclusion of Multiple Intelligences in Jordanian EFL Textbooks: A Content Analysis. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies.
[10] Bocconi, S. and Trentin, G. (2012) Wikis Supporting Formal and Informal Learning. Nova Science Publishers, New York.
[11] Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., Bacigalupo, M., Ferrari, A. and Punie, Y. (2009) Learning 2.0: The Impact of Web 2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe. Final Report (No. EUR 24103EN), European Commission-Joint Research Center -Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville.
[12] Rogers, T. (2003) Methodology in the Millennium. English Teaching Forum, 41, 2-13.
[13] Armstrong, T. (2000) Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. 2nd Edition, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria.
[14] Kallenbach, S. and Viens, J. (2002) Open to Interpretation: Multiple Intelligences Theory in Adult Literacy Education. NCSALL Report 21. National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge.
[15] Gardner, H. (1983/2004) Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. 1st/10th Edition, Basic Books, New York.
[16] Berman, M. (2005) A Multiple Intelligences Road to ELT Classroom. Cromwell Press, Trowbridge.
[17] Anderson, R. and Helms, J. (2001) The Ideal of Standards and the Reality of Schools: Needed Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 3-16.<3::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-V
[18] Haney, J., Czerniak, C. and Lumpe, A. (1996) Teacher Beliefs and Intentions Regarding the Implementation of Science Education Reform Strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 971-993.<971::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S
[19] Nespor, J. (1987) The Role of Beliefs in the Practice of Teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317-328.
[20] Huberman, M. (1993) The Lives of Teachers. Teachers College Press, New York.
[21] Christison, M. (1998) Applying Multiple Intelligences Theory in Pre-Service and In-Service TEFL Education Programs. English Teaching Forum, 36, 3-13.
[22] Richards, J. and Rodgers, T. (2001) Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[23] NCSALL (2006) Adult Multiple Intelligences Theory. Harvard University Graduate School Education.
[24] Gardner, H. (2003) Multiple Intelligences after Twenty Years.
[25] Gilman, L. (2001) Human Intelligence: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences.
[26] Smith, M. (2008) Howard Gardner, Multiple Intelligences and Education.
[27] Weiss, S. (1999) Extra! Extra! Interview with Howard Gardner. NEA Today Online.
[28] Moran, M., Kornhaber, M. and Gardner, H. (2006) Orchestrating Multiple Intelligences. Educational Leadership, 64.
[29] Giles, E., Pitre, S. and Womack, S. (2003) Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles. In: Orey, M., Ed., Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Technology.
[30] Christison, M. and Kennedy, D. (2003) Multiple Intelligences: Theory and Practice in Adult ESL. Eric Digest.
[31] Arikan, A. and Saricaoglu, A. (2009) A Study of Multiple Intelligences, Foreign Language Success and Some Selected Variables. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 5, 110-122.
[32] Sad, N. and Ar1bas, S. (2008) The Levels of Teachers at Primary Schools to Employ Materials and Activities Based on Multiple Intelligences Theory: Malatya Sample. Inönü üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9, 169-187.
[33] Botelho, M. (2003) Multiple Intelligences Theory in English Language Teaching: An Analysis of Current Textbooks, Materials and Teachers’ Perceptions. Master’s Thesis.
[34] Ministry of Education (2006) General Guidelines and General and Specific Outcomes for the English Language. Basic and Secondary Stages. 1st Edition, Ministry of Education, Amman.
[35] Fang, Z. (1996) A Review of Research on Teacher Beliefs and Practices. Educational Research, 38, 47-65.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.