Share This Article:

Tax Evasion Dynamics via Non-Equilibrium Model on Complex Networks

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:2259KB) PP. 775-783
DOI: 10.4236/tel.2015.56089    4,095 Downloads   4,433 Views  


The Zaklan model has become an excellent mechanism to control the tax evasion fluctuations (TEF) in a people- or agent-based community. Initially, the equilibrium Ising model (IM) had been used as a dynamic of temporal evolution of the Zaklan model near the critical point of the IM. On some complex network the IM presents no critical points or well-defined phase transitions. Then, through Monte Carlo simulations we study the recurring problem of the TEF control using the version of non-equilibrium Zaklan model as a control mechanism for TEF via agent-based non-equilibrium majority-vote model (MVM). Here we study the TEF on directed Barabási-Albert (BAD) and Apollonian (ANs) networks where the IM is not applied. We show that the Zaklan model can be also studied using non-equilibrium dynamics through of the non-equilibrium MVM on complex topologies cited above, giving the behavior of the TEF regardless of dynamic or topology used here.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Lima, F. (2015) Tax Evasion Dynamics via Non-Equilibrium Model on Complex Networks. Theoretical Economics Letters, 5, 775-783. doi: 10.4236/tel.2015.56089.


[1] Stauffer, D., de Oliveira, S.M., de Oliveira, P.M.C. and Martins, J.S.S. (2006) Biology, Sociology, Geology by Computational Physicists. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
[2] Galam, S. (2012) Sociophysics: A Physicist’s Modeling of Psycho-Political Phenomena. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg.
[3] Ball, P. (2012) Why Society Is a Complex Matter? Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg.
[4] Helbing, D. (2012) Social Self-Organization: Agent-Based Simulations and Experiments to Study Emergent Social Behavior. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg.
[5] Sen, P. and Chakrabarti, B.K. (2014) Sociophysics—An Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[6] Latané, B. (1981) The Psychology of Social Impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343.
[7] Zaklan, G., Westerhoff, F. and Stauffer, D. (2008) Analysing Tax Evasion Dynamics via the Ising Model. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 4, 1.
[8] Zaklan, G., Lima, F.W.S. and Westerhoff, F. (2008) Controlling Tax Evasion Fluctuations. Physica A, 387, 5857.
[9] Stauffer, D. (2013) A Biased Review of Sociophysics. Journal of Statistical Physics, 151, 9.
[10] Bloomquist, K. (2006) A Comparison of Agent-Based Models of Income Tax Evasion. Social Science Computer Review, 24, 411.
[11] Follmer, H. (1974) Random Economies with Many Interacting Agents. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1, 51-62.
[12] Andreoni, J., Erard, B. and Feinstein, J. (1998) Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 818-860.
[13] Lederman, L. (2003) The Interplay between Norms and Enforcement in Tax Compliance. Public Law Research Paper No. 49.
[14] Slemrod, J. (2007) Cheating Ourselves: The Economics of Tax Evasion. Journal of Economic Perspective, 21, 25-48.
[15] Wintrobe, R. and Gerxhani, K. (2004) Tax Evasion and Trust: A Comparative Analysis. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the European Public Choice Society, Berlin, 15-18 April 2004.
[16] Gachter, S. (2006) Conditional Cooperation: Behavioral Regularities from the Lab and the Field and Their Policy Implications. Discussion Papers 2006-03 CeDEx, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
[17] Frey, B.S. and Togler, B. (2006) Tax Evasion, Black Activities and Deterrence in Germany: An Institutional and Empirical Perspective. IEW-Working Papers 286, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich.
[18] Lima, F.W.S. (2010) Analysing and Controlling the Tax Evasion Dynamics via Majority-Vote Model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 246, Article ID: 012033.
[19] Lima, F.W.S. (2012) Controlling the Tax Evasion Dynamics via Majority-Vote Model on Various Topologies. Theoretical Economics Letters, 2, 87-93.
[20] Oliveira, M.J. (1992) Isotropic Majority-Vote Model on a Square Lattice. Journal of Statistical Physics, 66, 273-281.
[21] Andrade, R.S.F. and Herrmann, H.J. (2005) Magnetic Models on Apollonian Networks. Physical Review E, 71, Article ID: 056131.
[22] Andrade, R.S.F., Andrade Jr., J.S. and Herrmann, H.J. (2009) Ising Model on the Apollonian Network with Node-Dependent Interactions. Physical Review E, 79, Article ID: 036105.
[23] Sumour, M.A. and Shabat, M.M. (2005) Monte Carlo Simulation of Ising Model on Directed Barabasi-Albert Networks. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 16, 585-589.
[24] Aleksiejuk, A., Holyst, J.A. and Stauffer, D. (2002) Ferromagnetic Phase Transition in Barabási-Albert Networks. Physica A, 310, 260-266.
[25] Albert, R., Jeong, H. and Barabási, A.-L. (1999) Internet: Diameter of the World-Wide Web. Nature, 401, 130-131.
[26] Watts, D.J. and Strogatz, S.H. (1998) Collective Dynamics of “Small-World” Networks. Nature, 393, 440-442.
[27] Lima, F.W.S., Moreira, A.A. and Araújo, A.D. (2012) Nonequilibrium Model on Apollonian Networks. Physical Review E, 86, Article ID: 056109.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.