Optimization of the Angle of Frog in Mouldboard Tillage Operations in Sandy Clay Soil

DOI: 10.4236/ojop.2015.44013   PDF   HTML   XML   3,473 Downloads   4,149 Views   Citations

Abstract

This paper investigated the effect of three independent variables including: tillage speed (ranges of below 2.5 m/s and between 2.5 m/s and 5 m/s), tillage depth (range of 10 cm from 0 cm to 30 cm) and frog angle (30° 40°, and 50°) on draught forces. The experimental work was completed with determination of the draught forces using an analytical method (Saunders Equation). Numerical Simulation: Discrete Element Method (DEM) was used to verify the results obtained analytically. The results indicated that tillage depth has a stronger influence on the draught forces as compared to the tillage speed. Minimal draught forces can then be achieved through operating at shallow tillage depth and maintaining a frog angle of 30°. The results showed a variance of ±15.95% to the calculated values supporting DEM as a numerical method capable of predicting draft forces correctly, tillage power optimization and determination of optimal frog angle for the mouldboard plough.

Share and Cite:

Hiuhu, A. , Gitau, A. , Mbuge, D. and Mulwa, J. (2015) Optimization of the Angle of Frog in Mouldboard Tillage Operations in Sandy Clay Soil. Open Journal of Optimization, 4, 131-140. doi: 10.4236/ojop.2015.44013.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Formato, A. Faugno, S. and Paolillo, G. (2005) Numerical Simulation of Soil Plough Mouldboard Interaction. Biosystems Engineering, 92, 309-316.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.07.005
[2] Kushwaha, R.L. and Zhang, J. (1998) Dynamic Analysis of a Tillage Tool Part 1—Finite Element Model. Canada Agricultural Engineering, 40, 287-292.
[3] Owend, P.M.O. and Edward, S.M. (1996) Characteristic Loading of Light Mouldboard Ploughs at Low Speeds. Journal of Terramechanics, 335, 29-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-4898(96)00011-0
[4] Shrestha, D.S., Sing, G. and Gebresenbet, G. (2001) Optimizing Design Parameters of a Mouldboard Plough. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 78, 377-389.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2000.0663
[5] Godwin, R.J., O’ Dogherty, M.J., Saunders, C. and Balafoutis, A.T. (2007) A Force Prediction Model for Mouldboard Plough Incorporating the Effects of Soil Characteristics Properties, Plough Geometric Factors and Ploughing Speed. Biosystem Engineering, 97, 117-129.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.02.001
[6] Bentaher, H., Ibrahim, A., Hamza, E., Hbaieb, M., Kantchev, G., Malley, A. and Arnold, W. (2013) Finite Element Modelling Simulation of Mouldboard Plough Soil Interaction. Soil and Tillage Research, 134, 11-16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.07.002
[7] Temesgen, M. Savenije, H.H., Rockstorm, J. and Hoogmad, W.B. (2012) Assessment of Strip Tillage Systems on Maize Production in Semi-Arid Ethiopia. Physics and Chemistry of Earth Parts A/B/C, 47-48, 156-165.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2011.07.046
[8] Zadeh, S.R. (2006) Modelling of Energy Requirement by a Narrow Tillage Tool (PhD). University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, p. 190.
[9] Mckeys, E. (1985) Soil Cutting Tillage. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
[10] Martin, O., Klaus, D., Christos, V. and Peter, E. (2011) Prediction of Draft Forces in Cohesionless Soil with the Discrete Element Method. Journal of Terramechanics, 48, 347-358.
[11] Oida, A. and Momozu, M. (2002) Simulation of Soil Behavior and Reaction by Machine Part by Means of DEM. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR EJournal, IV, 1-7.
[12] Cundall, P.A. and Strack, Q.D.L. (1971) A Discrete Numerical Model for Granular Assemblies. Geotechnique, 29, 47-65.
[13] Owen, D.R.J., Feng, Y.T., De Souza Neto, E.A., et al. (2004) The Modelling of Multi Fracture Solids and Particulate Media. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 60, 317-339.
[14] Nezami, E.G., Hashash, Y.M.A., Zhao, D. and Ghaboussi, J. (2007) Simulation of Front end Loader Bucket-Soil Interaction Using Discrete Element Model. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 31, 47-62.
[15] Coetzee, C. and Els, D. (2009) The Numerical Modelling of Excavator Bucket Filling Using DEM. Journal of Terramechanics, 46, 217-227.
[16] Coetzee, C., Els, D. and Dymond, G. (2010) Discrete Element Parameter Calibration and the Modelling of Dragline Bucket Filling. Journal of Terramechanics, 47, 33-44.
[17] Mustafa, U., John, F. and Chris, S. (2014) Three Dimensional Discrete Element Modelling of Tillage: Determination of a Suitable Contact Model and Parameters for a Cohesionless Soil. Biosystem Engineering, 10, 106-117.
[18] Ucgul, M., Fielke, J.M. and Saunders, C. (2015) Defining the Effect of Sweep Tillage Tool Cutting Edge Geometry on Tillage Forces Using 3D Discrete Element Modelling. Information Processing in Agriculture, 2, 130-141.
[19] Raji, A.O. (1999) Discrete Element Modelling of the Deformation of Bulk Agricultural Particles (PhD). University of Newcastle, Newcastle, p. 165.
[20] EDEM (2010) EDEM User Guide. DEM Solutions, Edinburgh.
www.dem-solutions.com
[21] Saunders, C., Godwin, R.J. and O’Dohgerty, M.J. (2000) Prediction of Soil Forces Acting on Mouldboard Plough. Fourth International Conference on Soil Dynamics, Adelaide.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.