Home > Journals > Social Sciences & Humanities > OJML
Share This Article:

Affect-Loaded Questions in Japanese Storytelling: An Analysis of Grammar, Prosody, and Body Movements of Story Recipients’ Questions

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:1186KB) PP. 481-510
DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2015.55043    3,321 Downloads   3,825 Views   Citations
Author(s)    Leave a comment

ABSTRACT

The present study explores affective stance in conversational storytelling by investigating the ways in which unknowing story recipients display affective stances toward a teller’s story through questions that deploy multimodal resources. The data are based on videotaped natural face-to-face conversations between native Japanese speakers. While unknowing story recipients ask questions of the storyteller only to elicit factual information (“neutral questions”), they also ask questions layered with affect (“affect-loaded questions”). Building on studies on affect and stance, assessment, questions, and alignment and affiliation in storytelling, I demonstrate how unknowing story recipients ask affect-loaded questions to elicit and display affective stances toward story contents by exploiting linguistic and non-linguistic resources. First, I explicate how unknowing story recipients employ not only linguistic devices (e.g., emotion words, wh-questions, and deictic expressions such as sonna “like that”), but also prosody, facial expressions, body movements, and pre-/concurrent-laughter in order to load questions with affective stance that display, for example, disgust, humor, sarcasm, criticism, or surprise. Secondly, I show how unknowing story recipients use rhetorical questions to express their affect (rather than to elicit information from the storyteller). Thirdly, I demonstrate how affiliation of affective stance between storyteller and unknowing story recipients influences the trajectory of storytelling and how the participants negotiate their affective stances. This study sheds light on the interactional process of how participants in talk-in-interaction display affective stance through a range of multimodal resources, by examining how unknowing story recipients ask affect-loaded questions of the storyteller. It illuminates the social practice of story recipients’ active participation in storytelling activity that is embedded in social interaction, through their use of questions that dynamically co-construct and negotiate affective stance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Koike, C. (2015) Affect-Loaded Questions in Japanese Storytelling: An Analysis of Grammar, Prosody, and Body Movements of Story Recipients’ Questions. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5, 481-510. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2015.55043.

References

[1] Adachi, T. (1999). Nihongo Gimonbun ni okeru Handan no Shosoo [Aspects of Judgment on Questions in Japanese]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
[2] Besnier, N. (1990). Language and Affect. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 419-451.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.002223
[3] Bolinger, D. L. (1957). Interrogative Structures of American English: The Direct Question. Publication of the American Dialect Society, No. 28. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
[4] Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2012). Exploring Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint Stories. In A. Perakyla, & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in Interaction (pp. 113-146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0006
[5] Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The Stance Triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction (pp. 139-182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du
[6] Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
[7] Goodwin, C. (1979). The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 97-121). New York: Irvington Publishers.
[8] Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes on Story Structure and the Organization of Participation. In M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 225-246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[9] Goodwin, C. (1986). Audience Diversity, Participation and Interpretation. Text, 6, 283-316.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1986.6.3.283
[10] Goodwin, C. (2002). Time in Action. Current Anthropology, 43, 19-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/339566
[11] Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, Stance, and Affect in the Organization of Activities. Discourse and Society, 18, 53-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457
[12] Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M.H. (1992). Assessments and the Construction of Context. In A. Duranti, & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (pp. 147-189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[13] Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
[14] Goodwin, M. H. (2006). Participation, Affect, and Trajectory in Family Directive/Response Sequences. Text & Talk, 26, 515-543.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.021
[15] Goodwin, M. H., Cekaite, A., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Emotion as Stance. In A. Perakyla, & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in Interaction (pp. 6-41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0002
[16] Hasegawa, Y. (2006). Embedded Soliloquy and Affective Stances in Japanese. In S. Suzuki (Ed.), Emotive Communication in Japanese (pp. 209-229). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.151.11has
[17] Hayano, K. (2013). Question Design in Conversation. In J. Sidnell, & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 395-414). West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
[18] Hayashi, M. (2003). Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sidag.12
[19] Hayashi, M. (2010). An Overview of the Question-Response System in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2685-2702.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.006
[20] Heritage, J. (2002). The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1427-1446.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3
[21] Heritage, J. (2011). Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation (pp. 159-183). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.008
[22] Iwasaki, S. (2013). Japanese: Revised Edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/loall.17
[23] Iwasaki, S. (2014). Grammar of the Internal Expressive Sentences in Japanese. In K. Kabata, & T. Ono (Eds.), Usage-Based Approaches to Japanese Grammar: Towards the Understanding of Human Language (pp. 55-83). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/slcs.156.07iwa
[24] Jefferson, G. (1984a). On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-Positioned Matters. In M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 191-222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[25] Jefferson, G. (1984b). On the Organization of Laughter in Talk about Troubles. In M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 346-369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[26] Koike, C. (2003). An Analysis of Increments in Japanese Conversation in Terms of Intonation and Grammar. In P. M. Clancy (Ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics (Vol. 11, pp. 67-80). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
[27] Koike, C. (2007). E?-Prefaced Utterance in Japanese: A Discourse Particle Projecting a Question. Paper Presented at the 2007 American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference, Costa Mesa, 21-24 April 2007.
[28] Koike, C. (2008). Kandooshi E no Kinoo to Intoneeshon to Higengokoodoo ni kansuru Ichikoosatsu [An Analysis of Interjection E in terms of Functions, Intonation, and Body Movements]. Proceedings of the 22nd Japanese Association of Sociolinguistic Sciences Conference, Nagoya, 58-61.
[29] Koike, C. (2009). Interaction in Storytelling in Japanese Conversations: An Analysis of Story Recipients’ Questions. Ph.D. Thesis, Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.
[30] Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sidag.16
[31] Labov, W. (1972). Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
[32] Lerner, G. (1991). On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress. Language in Society, 20, 441-458.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016572
[33] Lindstrom, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2013). Affiliation in Conversation. In J. Sidnell, & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 350-369). West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
[34] Maynard, S. K. (1989). Japanese Conversation: Self-Contextualization through Structure and Interactional Management. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
[35] Maynard, S. K. (2002). Linguistic Emotivity: Centrality of Place, the Topic-Comment Dynamic, and an Ideology of Pathos in Japanese Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.97
[36] Minami, F. (1985). Shitsumonbun no Koozoo [The Structure of Question Sentence]. In S. Mizutani (Ed.), Asakura Nihongo Shinkooza 4: Bunpoo to Imi II [Asakura Japanese New Lecture Series 4: Grammar and Meaning II] (pp. 39-74). Tokyo: Asakura Shoten.
[37] Miyazaki, K. (2002). Kakunin Yookyuu [Confirmation Request]. In K. Miyazaki, T. Adachi, H. Noda, & S. Takanashi (Eds.), Modaritii [Modality] (pp. 203-227). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
[38] Miyazaki, K. (2005). Gendai Nihongo no Gimon Hyoogen: Utagai to Kakunin Yookyuu [Interrogative Expressions of Modern Japanese: Doubt and Confirmation Request]. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shoboo.
[39] Mori, J. (1999). Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sidag.8
[40] Moriyama, T. (1989). Ninshiki no Muudo to Sono Shuuhen [Mode of Recognition and Its Periphery]. In Y. Nitta, & T. Masuoka (Eds.), Nihongo no Modaritii [Modality in Japanese] (pp. 57-120). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
[41] Ochs, E. (1996). Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity. In J. Gumperz, & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 407-437). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[42] Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2001). Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[43] Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874
[44] Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (1989). Language Has a Heart. Text, 9, 7-25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7
[45] Ono, T. (2006). An Emotively Motivated Post-Predicate Constituent Order in a “Strict Predicate Final” Language: Emotion and Grammar Meet in Japanese Everyday Talk. In S. Suzuki (Ed.), Emotive Communication in Japanese (pp. 139-153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.151.07ono
[46] Pierrehumbert, J., & Beckman, M. E. (1988). Japanese Tone Structure. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.
[47] Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes. In M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[48] Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939-967.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1519752
[49] Ruusuvuori, J. (2013). Emotion, Affect and Conversation. In J. Sidnell, & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 331-349). West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
[50] Ruusuvuori, J., & Perakyla, A. (2009). Facial and Verbal Expressions in Assessing Stories and Topics. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42, 377-394.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08351810903296499
[51] Sacks, H. (1974). An Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in Conversation. In R. Bauman, & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking (pp. 337-353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[52] Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
[53] Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208
[54] Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 31-57.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123
[55] Suzuki, S. (2006). Surprise and Disapproval: On How Societal Views of the Outside Correlate with Linguistic Expressions. In S. Suzuki (Ed.), Emotive Communication in Japanese (pp. 155-171). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.151.08suz
[56] Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
[57] Weber, E. (1993). Varieties of Questions in English Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sidag.3
[58] Wilce, J. M. (2009). Language and Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626692

  
comments powered by Disqus
OJML Subscription
E-Mail Alert
OJML Most popular papers
Publication Ethics & OA Statement
OJML News
Frequently Asked Questions
Recommend to Peers
Recommend to Library
Contact Us

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.