[1]
|
Joosten-ten Brinke, D., van Bruggen, J., Hermans, H., Burgers, J., Giesbers, B., Koper, R. and Latour, I. (2007) Modeling Assessment for Re-Use of Traditional and New Types of Assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2721-2741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.08.009
|
[2]
|
Siozos, P., Palaigeorgiou, G., Triantafyllakos, G. and Despotakis, T. (2009) Computer Based Testing Using “Digital Ink”: Participatory Design of a Tablet PC Based Assessment Application for Secondary Education. Computers & Education, 52, 811-819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.006
|
[3]
|
Moridis, C.N. and Economides, A.A. (2009) Mood Recognition during Online Self-Assessment Test. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2, 50-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2009.12
|
[4]
|
Terzis, V. and Economides, A.A. (2011) The Acceptance and Use of Computer Based Assessment. Computers & Education, 56, 1032-1044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.017
|
[5]
|
Maqableh, M. (2012) Analysis and Design Security Primitives Based on Chaotic Systems for eCommerce. Durham University.
|
[6]
|
Karajeh, H., Maqableh, M. and Masa’deh, R. (2014) A Review on Stereoscopic 3D: Home Entertainment for the Twenty First Century. 3D Research-Springer, 5, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13319-014-0026-3
|
[7]
|
Deutsch, T., Herrmann, K., Frese, T. and Sandholzer, H. (2012) Implementing Computer-Based Assessment—A Web-Based Mock Examination Changes Attitudes. Computers and Education, 58, 1068-1075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.013
|
[8]
|
Masa’deh, R. (2013) A Structural Equation Modeling Approach for Determining Antecedents and Outcomes of Students’ Attitude toward Mobile Commerce Adoption. Life Science Journal, 10, 2321-2333.
|
[9]
|
Sieber, V. and Young, D. (2008) Factors Associated with the Successful Introduction of On-Line Diagnostic, Formative and Summative Assessment in the Medical Sciences Division University of Oxford, 267-278. http://caaconference.co.uk/pastConferences/2008/proceedings/Seiber_V_Young_D_final_formatted_
e1.pdf
|
[10]
|
Ko, C.C. and Cheng, C.D. (2008) Flexible and Secure Computer-Based Assessment Using a Single Zip Disk. Computers and Education, 50, 915-926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.010
|
[11]
|
Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249008
|
[12]
|
Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (1996) A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. Decision Science, 27, 451-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x
|
[13]
|
Kreiter, C.D., Ferguson, K. and Gruppen, L.D. (1999) Evaluating the Usefulness of Computerized Adaptive Testing for Medical In-Course Assessment. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 74, 1125-1128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199910000-00016
|
[14]
|
Terzis, V., Moridis, C.N. and Economides, A.A. (2012) How Student’s Personality Traits Affect Computer Based Assessment Acceptance: Integrating BFI with CBAAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1985-1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.019
|
[15]
|
Terzis, V., Moridis, C.N. and Economides, A.A. (2013) Continuance Acceptance of Computer Based Assessment through the Integration of User’s Expectations and Perceptions. Computers and Education, 62, 50-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.018
|
[16]
|
Thelwall, M. (2000) Computer-Based Assessment: A Versatile Educational Tool. Computers & Education, 34, 37-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00037-8
|
[17]
|
Jantz, C., Anderson, J. and Gould, S.M. (2002) Using Computer-Based Assessments to Evaluate Interactive Multimedia Nutrition Education among Low-Income Predominantly Hispanic Participants. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34, 252-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60103-6
|
[18]
|
He, L. and Brandt, P. (2007) WEAS: A Web-Based Educational Assessment System. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Southeast Regional Conference, ACM, New York, 126-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1233341.1233365
|
[19]
|
JImoh, R.G., Yussuff, M.A., Akanmu, M.A., Enikuomehin, A.O. and Salman, I.R. (2011) Acceptability of Computer Based Testing (CBT) Mode for Undergraduate Courses in Computer Science. Journal of Science, Technology, Mathematics and Education (JOSTMED), 7, 11-20.
|
[20]
|
Saleem, H., Beaudry, A. and Croteau, A.M. (2011) Antecedents of Computer Self-Efficacy: A Study of the Role of Personality Traits and Gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1922-1936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.017
|
[21]
|
Alquraan, M.F. (2012) Methods of Assessing Students’ Learning in Higher Education: An Analysis of Jordanian College and Grading System. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 5, 124-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17537981211251160
|
[22]
|
Jimoh, R.G., Shittu, A.K. and Kawu, Y.K. (2012) Students’ Perception of Computer Based Test (CBT) for Examining Undergraduate Chemistry Courses. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 3, 125-134.
|
[23]
|
Van Der Kleij, F.M., Eggen, T.J.H.M., Timmers, C.F. and Veldkamp, B.P. (2012) Effects of Feedback in a Computer-Based Assessment for Learning. Computers and Education, 58, 263-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.020
|
[24]
|
Quellmalz, E. (2014) Computer-Based Assessment. In: Gunston, R., Ed., Encyclopedia of Science Education SE-44-2, Springer, Dordrecht, 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6165-0_44-2
|
[25]
|
Terzis, V., Moridis, C.N., Economides, A.A. and Mendez, G.R. (2013) Computer Based Assessment Acceptance: A Cross-Cultural Study in Greece and Mexico. Educational Technology and Society, 16, 411-424.
|
[26]
|
Abduh, H.Y., Hussin, R., Bin, C. and Dahlan, H.M. (2014) Technology Acceptance for CBT in Secondary Schools of Saudi Arabia, 3-6.
|
[27]
|
Huff, K.C. (2015) The Comparison of Mobile Devices to Computers for Web-Based Assessments. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 208-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.008
|
[28]
|
Timmers, C.F., Walraven, A. and Veldkamp, B.P. (2015) The Effect of Regulation Feedback in a Computer-Based Formative Assessment on Information Problem Solving. Computers & Education, 87, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.012
|
[29]
|
Landry, B.J.L., Griffeth, R. and Hartman, S. (2006) Measuring Student Perceptions of Blackboard Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4, 87-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00103.x
|
[30]
|
Terzis, V., Moridis, C.N. and Economides, A.A. (2011) The Extension of the Computer Based Assessment Acceptance Model with Perceived Importance. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Interactive Computer-Aided Blended Learning, Antigua Guatemala, 2-4 November 2011.
|
[31]
|
Liao, H.L. and Lu, H.P. (2008) The Role of Experience and Innovation Characteristics in the Adoption and Continued Use of E-Learning Websites. Computers and Education, 51, 1405-1416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.006
|
[32]
|
Teo, T. (2009) Modeling Technology Acceptance in Education: A Study of Pre-Service Teachers. Computers & Education, 52, 302-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
|
[33]
|
Mayer, R.E. (2002) A Taxonomy for Computer-Based Assessment of Problem Solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 623-632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00020-1
|
[34]
|
Gikandi, J.W., Morrow, D. and Davis, N.E. (2011) Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature. Computers and Education, 57, 2333-2351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
|
[35]
|
Terzis, V. and Economides, A.A. (2011) Computer Based Assessment: Gender Differences in Perceptions and Acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2108-2122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.005
|
[36]
|
Nirmalakhandan, N. (2013) Improving Problem-Solving Skills of Undergraduates through Computerized Dynamic Assessment. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 615-621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.117
|
[37]
|
Pilli, O. and Aksu, M. (2013) The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on the Achievement, Attitudes and Retention of Fourth Grade Mathematics Students in North Cyprus. Computers and Education, 62, 62-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.010
|
[38]
|
Moon, J.W. and Kim, Y.G. (2001) Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context. Information and Management, 38, 217-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
|
[39]
|
Malone, T.W. (1981) Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5, 333-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0504_2
|
[40]
|
Lee, Y.C. (2008) The Role of Perceived Resources in Online Learning Adoption. Computers and Education, 50, 1423-1438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.01.001
|
[41]
|
Ong, C.S. and Lai, J.Y. (2006) Gender Differences in Perceptions and Relationships among Dominants of E-Learning Acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 816-829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006
|
[42]
|
Van Raaij, E.M. and Schepers, J.J.L. (2008) The Acceptance and Use of a Virtual Learning Environment in China. Computers & Education, 50, 838-852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001
|
[43]
|
Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1999) Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies? Decision Sciences, 30, 361-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x
|
[44]
|
Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V. and Stair, R.M. (2000) Research Report: The Evolving Relationship between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy? An Empirical Assessment. Information Systems Research, 11, 418-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.418.11876
|
[45]
|
Garrido-Moreno, A., Padilla-Mele, A. and Del Aguila-Obra, A.R. (2008) Factors Affecting E-Collaboration Technology Use among Management Students. Computers & Education, 51, 609-623.
|
[46]
|
Karahanna, E. and Straub, D.W. (1999) The Psychological Origins of Perceived Usefulness and Ease-of-Use. Information & Management, 35, 237-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00096-2
|
[47]
|
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.
|
[48]
|
Wang, Y.-S., Cheng, M. and Wang, H.-Y. (2008) Investigating the Determinants and Age and Gender Differences in the Acceptance of Mobile Learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 92-118.
|
[49]
|
Smith, P.J., Smith, P.J., Murphy, K.L., Murphy, K.L., Mahoney, S.E. and Mahoney, S.E. (2003) Towards Identifying Factors Underlying Readiness for Online Learning: An Exploratory Study. Distance Education, 24, 57-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587910303043
|
[50]
|
Yi, M.Y. and Hwang, Y. (2003) Predicting the Use of Web-Based Information Systems: Self-Efficacy, Enjoyment, Learning Goal Orientation, and the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 59, 431-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00114-9
|
[51]
|
Shih, H.P. (2008) Using a Cognition-Motivation-Control View to Assess the Adoption Intention for Web-Based Learning. Computers and Education, 50, 327-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.06.001
|
[52]
|
Vroom, V.H. (1964) Work and Motivation. 14th Edition, Wiley, New York.
|
[53]
|
Cahill, S.E. and Bandura, A. (1987) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Contemporary Sociology, 16, 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2071177
|
[54]
|
Ong, C.S., Lai, J.Y. and Wang, Y.S. (2004) Factors Affecting Engineers’ Acceptance of Asynchronous E-Learning Systems in High-Tech Companies. Information and Management, 41, 795-804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.012
|
[55]
|
Weinerth, K., Koenig, V., Brunner, M. and Martin, R. (2014) Concept Maps: A Useful and Usable Tool for Computer-Based Knowledge Assessment? A Literature Review with a Focus on Usability. Computers and Education, 78, 201-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.002
|
[56]
|
Byrne, B.M. (2001) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mahwah.
|
[57]
|
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. and Black, W. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th edition, Prentice-Hall International Inc., Upper Saddle River.
|
[58]
|
Kline, R.B. (2005) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd Edition, The Guilford Press, New York.
|
[59]
|
Kline, R.B. (2010) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press, New York.
|
[60]
|
Krejcie, R.V. and Morgan, D.W. (1970) Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Education and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
|
[61]
|
Pallant, J. (2005) SPSS Survival Guide—A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows. Open University Press, Chicago.
|
[62]
|
Newkirk, H.E., Newkirk, H.E., Lederer, A.L. and Lederer, A.L. (2006) The Effectiveness of Strategic Information Systems Planning under Environmental Uncertainty. Information & Management, 43, 481-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.12.001
|
[63]
|
Arbuckle, J.L. (2009) Amos 18 User’s Guide, 635.
|
[64]
|
Chou, T.C., Chang, P.L., Cheng, Y.P. and Tsai, C.T. (2007) A Path Model Linking Organizational Knowledge Attributes, Information Processing Capabilities, and Perceived Usability. Information and Management, 44, 408-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.03.003
|
[65]
|
Bagozzi, R. and Yi, Y. (1988) On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
|
[66]
|
Holmes-Smith, P. (2001) Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling Using LISREL. ACSPRI Winter Training Program, Perth.
|
[67]
|
Creswell, J.W. (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, Los Angeles.
|
[68]
|
Sekaran, U. (2003) Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. 4th Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
|
[69]
|
Sekaran, U. and Roger, B. (2013) Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. 6th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex.
|
[70]
|
Blumberg, B., Cooper, D.R. and Schindler, P.S. (2005) Business Research Methods. McGraw Hill, Berkshire, 770.
|
[71]
|
Gefen, D., Straub, D.W. and Boudreau, M.B. (2000) Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 1-76. http://www.cis.gsu.edu/~dstraub/Papers/Resume/Gefenetal2000.pdf
|
[72]
|
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 18, 39-50.
|