Promote the Development of Cultural Creation Industry through Technological Policies
—Take the Case of Glove Puppetry of Taiwan

Wei Song, Xue Qi

University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.

DOI: 10.4236/jssm.2015.85070                

Abstract

Nowadays, the development of digital technology profoundly influences people’s consumption patterns around the world. And the progress of cultural creative industry has already brought considerable profits to many countries. So how to develop cultural creative industry with proper policy of science and technology has become a highly focused issue in many countries. This paper focuses on the 3-D Puppet Play which launched by the Taiwan PILI international corporation and tries to explore appropriate ways to make good use of the collaboration between industry-government-academy in order to achieve the value of creative industry. Furthermore, by using this example, the process of tools selection and roles transition of the government in the cooperation, and the theory framework will also be discussed. And all these findings will be a great contribution to the future cross-border cooperation and help to make proper policy of science and technology for cultural creative industry.

Keywords

Digital Technology, Cultural Industry, Co-Production of Value, Policy Tool

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Lawrence, T.B. and Phillips, N. (2002) Understanding Cultural Industries. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11, 430-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1056492602238852
[2]	Townley, B., Beech, N. and McKinlay, A. (2009) Managing in the Creative Industries: Managing the Motley Crew. Human Relations, 62, 939-962. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726709335542
[3]	Liu, H.R. and Chen, F.X. (2011) Opportunities of Taiwan Cultural Creation Industry—Inspection of and Suggestions for Cultural Creation Industry in Nantou Senior Research Institution Park. Academic Journal of Taiwan Administration, 9, 23-42.
[4]	Feng, G.H., Dai, S.Q. and Lai, W.S. (2013) Value Co-Creation of Local Cultural Creation Industry. Academic Journal of Dongwu Economic Business Science, 82, 1-33.
[5]	Ockham, J. (2013) Art and Creative Industry. Central Compilation & Translation Press, Beijing.
[6]	Wu, Q.Y. (2010) Distinguishing of Concepts about Cultural Creation Industry. Economist, 8, 57-58.
[7]	Liao, S.Z., Zhang, D.Y., Li, Y., et al. (2002) The Influence of Koinning WTO on Beijing Culltural Industry.
[8]	Xu, X.H. (1987) Several Problems about Researches of Technological Policies. Science and Technology Management Research, 1.
[9]	Hu, H.L. (2014) Indicators for the Rational Development of Cultural Industry—Construction of Indicator System for Development of China’s Guidance-Oriented Cultural Industry. Academic Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University: (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 22, 82-87.
[10]	Mao, L., Xie, F.J. and Song, Y.M. (2014) Analysis of Policies about Clustering Cultural Creation Industry from the Perspective of Evolution. Technical Progress and Countermeasures, 31, 88-91.
[11]	Liang, R.B. (2011) Breif Exploration of the Development of Taiwan Cultural Creation Industry. Taiwan Research, 3.
[12]	Xu, X.H. (1987) Several Problems about Researches of Technological Policies. Science and Technology Management Research, 1.
[13]	Yin, R. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, Beverly Hills.
[14]	Eliadis, P., Margaretn, M.H. and Howleft, M., Eds. (2004) Designing Government: From Instruments to Government. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal.
[15]	McCarter, M.W., Mahoney, J.T. and North Craft, G.B. (2011) Testing the Waters: How Collective Real Options Manage the Social Dilemma of Strategic Alliances. Academy of Management Review, 36, 621-640.