Trends in Markets for Forest-Based Products and Consequences for Selected Countries

Abstract

The forest sectors in many regions and countries are facing a need to change their structure, due to the development of new markets, emergence of new competitors, and shifts in production and consumption patterns for forest products. This article focuses on recent changes in the trade in these products, on imports and exports of four countries (USA, Sweden, Ukraine and, to a lesser extent, China) during the period from 1995 to 2011. For this purpose we use explanatory data analysis, time series analysis, benchmarking, meta-synthesis and content analysis of scientific and business publications concerning national and global trends in forest product industries. Data sources are various organizations’ databases of international trade in forest-based products in both monetary and physical terms (cubic meters and tons). The results show that the US and Swedish forest sectors are adversely affected by downturns in both their domestic and foreign markets during the study period, while the Ukrainian sector maintains exports of low value-added products at roughly constant levels (except that particle-board exports increase). China maintains production quantities of low value-added forest-based products, but also substantially increases exports of high-value added products. The results may facilitate efforts to forecast future trends and provide useful information and methodological approaches for future studies of interest to industry representatives, policy-makers and researchers.

Share and Cite:

Maksymets, O. and Lönnstedt, L. (2015) Trends in Markets for Forest-Based Products and Consequences for Selected Countries. Open Journal of Forestry, 5, 697-710. doi: 10.4236/ojf.2015.57062.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Alvarez, M. (2007). The State of America’s Forests. Abundant Forests Alliance. Bethesda, MD: Society of American Foresters.
[2] Brown, C., & Ortiz, G. (2001). The Forest Processing Investment Environment. A Report Prepared for the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry by Forest Research. Technical Paper No. 01/05.
[3] Cadot, O. ( 2013). A Guide to Trade Data Analysis. In O. Cadot, J.-F. Arvis, T. Farole, J. Gourdon, A. Grover, J. G. Reis, Y. Strachan, & S. Wagle (Eds.), World Bank’s International Trade Department (22 p). Washington DC: The World Bank.
[4] Eastin, I., Cao, J., Ganguly, I., & Seol, M. (2012). China’s Impact on Global Forest-Based Products Trade—Viewpoint from Abroad. Proceedings of the 55th International Convention of Society of Wood Science and Technology, 27-31 August 2012, Beijing, 16 p.
[5] European Commission (2012). Environment Action Programme.
http://ec.europa.eu/clima/news/articles/news_2012112901_en.htm
[6] Fabris, N. (2010). Montenegrin Foreign Trade Statistics Analysis Using General and Special Trade Systems Data on International Trade Are an Important Indicator of the Economic Openness and Development of a Country. In N. Fabris, B. Kilibarda, & M. Radunovic (Eds.), Working Papers (p. 18), Podgorica: Central Bank of Montenegro.
[7] Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2004). Structural Changes in International Trade. Revue économique, 6, 1071-1097.
[8] Fetscherin, M., Alon, I., Johnson, J. P., & Pillania, R. K. (2012). Export Competitiveness Patterns in Indian Industries. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal Incorporating. Journal of Global Competitiveness, 22, 188-206.
[9] Heckscher, E. F., & Ohlin, B. G. (1991). Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[10] Jonsson, R., Egnell, G., & Baudin, A. (2011). Swedish Forest Sector Outlook Study. Geneva Timber and Forest Discussion Paper 58, Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
[11] Kovalcík, M. (2011). Profitability and Competitiveness of Forestry in European Countries. Journal of Forest Science, 57, 369-376.
[12] Li, N., & Toppinen, A. (2011). Corporate Responsibility and Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the Forest-Based Industry: Complementary or Conflicting Goals? Forest Policy and Economics, 13, 113-123.
[13] Maksymets, O. (2011). The Evaluation of Competitive Advantage of Ukraine in Forest-Based Products International Trade during Modern Economic Crisis. International Trade: Economics, Finance, Law. Scientific Journal, 4-5. (In Ukrainian)
[14] Maksymets, O. (2012). The Study of the Changes in Ukraine’s Foreign Trade Geography for Wood Forest-Based Products under the Influence of Economic Crisis and Environmental Initiatives. Scientific Almanac of National Forestry University of Ukraine, 22, 125-136. (In Ukrainian)
[15] Milana, C. (1988). Constant-Market Shares Analysis and Index Number. European Journal of Political Economy, 4, 453-478.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0176-2680(88)90011-0
[16] Mimouni, M., Fontagné, L., von Kirchbach, F., Conte, K., Freudenberg, M., & Pasteels, J.-M. (2007). The Trade Performance Index. Geneva: Market Analysis Section International Trade Center (ITC).
[17] Nagubadi, R. V., & Zhang, D. (2006). Competitiveness in the Sawmills and Wood Preservation Industry in the United States and Canada. Forest Science, 52, 340-352
[18] Neale, D., Murdoch, I., Bromley, K., & Legg, K. (2012). Global Forest, Paper & Packaging Industry Survey—Survey of 2011 Results. London: PWC.
[19] Ortiz, G. A. (2004). Benchmarking the Competitiveness of the New Zealand Wood Processing Industry (53 p). Report Prepared for the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) by Forest Research, Wellington: MAF.
[20] Othman, M., & Rashid, Z. A. (1993). Constant Market Share Analysis of the ASEAN Timber Trade Theory Pertanika. Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 1, 71-80.
[21] Price Waterhouse Coopers (2013).
http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/forest-paper-packaging/index.jhtml
[22] Ricardo, D. (1817/2004). The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. New York: Dover.
[23] Richardson, J. D. (1971). Constant-Market Shares Analysis of Export Growth. Journal of International Economic, 1, 227-239.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(71)90058-4
[24] Toming, K. (2007). The Impact of EU Accession on the Export Competitiveness of Estonian Food Processing Industry. Post-Communist Economies, 19, 187-207.
[25] Vichevych, A., & Maksymets, O. (2009). International Economic Activity Analysis (2nd ed.). Kyiv, Professional Publishing. (In Ukrainian)

Copyright © 2023 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.