An Indicator Model of the Spatial Quantification and Pattern Analysis of Urban Sustainability: A Case Study of Cincinnati, Ohio

Gökçer Okumuş¹, David J. Edelman²

¹Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
²School of Planning, College of Design, Architecture, Art and Planning, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/cus.2015.33019                

Abstract

Shen & Guo (2014) have recently developed an array of urban sustainability indicators (USIs) as a tool to measure urban sustainability. Using 2006 data for Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, they developed a theoretical integrated USI model with a hierarchical index system, to spatially monitor urban sustainability using geo-matic approaches and further statistically detect its spatial patterns. The purpose of this study is to apply Shen and Guo’s general approach to a major American city, Cincinnati, Ohio, utilizing U.S. census data from 2010, to test its utility beyond the original Canadian test case. In doing so, the model and its indicator structure were modified for the American context after a further review of sustainability indicators. Unlike Shen and Guo, however, the model is not subjectively weighted. Nevertheless, the revised model similarly applied both statistical analysis and geo-statistical analysis to explore how urban sustainability was spatially distributed and what spatial patterns (random, dispersed or clustered) for the indices could be found among Cincinnati’s census tracts. This work confirms Shen and Guo’s conclusion that geo-matic tools can be applied to detect spatially urban sustainability patterns, which can be provided visually for urban planners, managers and administrators for use in future policy making and implementation.

Keywords

Urban Sustainability, Urbanization and Quality of Life, Indicator Model, GIS, Spatial Pattern Analysis, Spatial Autocorrelation, Cincinnati

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Harvey, L. D. D. (1991). The Role of Municipalities in Combating Global Warming. Eco Decision, 3, 74-76.
[2]	Kroger Grocery Addresses http://www.kroger.com
[3]	Mori, K., & Christodoulou, A. (2012). Review of Sustainability Indices and Indicators: Towards a New City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32, 94-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.001
[4]	Scott, T. G. (2010). Census: Cincinnati 62nd Largest US City. Business Courier, June 22, 2010.
[5]	Shen, L., & Guo, X. (2014). Spatial Quantification and Pattern Analysis of Urban Sustainability Based on a Subjectively Weighted Indicator Model: A Case Study in the City of Saskatoon, SK, Canada. Applied Geography, 53, 117-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.06.001
[6]	Shen, L., Kyllo, J. M., & Guo, X. (2013). An Integrated Model Based on a Hierarchical Indices System for Monitoring and Evaluating Urban Sustainability. Sustainability, 5, 524-559. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su5020524
[7]	Shen, L., Ochoa, J. J., Shah, M. N., & Zhang, X. (2011). The Application of Urban Sustainability Indicators—A Comparison between Various Practices. Habitat International, 35, 17-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.03.006
[8]	The Housing and Transportation Affordability Index http://htaindex.cnt.org
[9]	The Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments http://www.oki.org
[10]	U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey http://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs.html
[11]	U.S. Census Bureau Quick Facts http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/39/3915000.html
[12]	U.S. Census Bureau’s MAF/TIGER Database https://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/tiger.html
[13]	U.S. Geological Survey http://glovis.usgs.gov
[14]	Vojnovic, I. (2014). Urban Sustainability: Research, Politics, Policy and Practice. Cities, 41, 530-544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.002