Business Partnerships in Local Government
Eti Sarig
The Open University, Raanana, Israel.
DOI: 10.4236/cus.2015.33018   PDF   HTML   XML   3,586 Downloads   4,470 Views   Citations


This study tests the predictive ability of a number of factors that affect local municipal business partnerships, including development policy, municipality size, geographical location, national priority and the characteristics of the municipality and its leader. Using original survey data and a variety of data sources, the research model tests the influence of these institutional, individual and environmental factors on the scope of municipal business partnerships. The paper suggests that political factors are still dominant in local decision making processes and finds a dramatic rise in business partnerships and mixed public-private delivery (joint contracting) of city services.

Share and Cite:

Sarig, E. (2015) Business Partnerships in Local Government. Current Urban Studies, 3, 216-230. doi: 10.4236/cus.2015.33018.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Alterman, R. (1999). Between Privatization and Continued National Ownership: A Future Land Policy for Israel. Jerusalem: Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies. (In Hebrew)
[2] Applebaum, L., & Hazan, A. (2005). Cooperation between Small Municipalities: Lessons for Israel. Jerusalem: Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies. (In Hebrew)
[3] Ben-Elia, N. (1996). Organizational Reorientation and Learning in Israeli Local Government: The Role of Market Type Mechanisms. In N. Ben-Elia (Ed.), Strategic Changes and Organizational Reorientations in Local Government: A Cross National Perspective (pp. 1-19). London: Macmillan.
[4] Ben-Elia, N. (1999). Government Finance and the Fiscal Crisis in Israeli Local Authorities. Jerusalem: The Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies. (In Hebrew)
[5] Carmeli, A. (2000). The Relation between Organizational Resources and Performance—Failure and Success—of Local Authorities in Israel. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Haifa: University of Haifa. (In Hebrew)
[6] de Socio, M. (2007). Business Community Structures and Urban Regimes: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29, 339-366.
[7] DiGaetano, A., & Strom, E. (2003). Comparative Urban Governance: An Integrated Approach. Urban Affairs Review, 38, 356-395.
[8] Dowding, K. (2001). Explaining Urban Regimes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25, 7-19.
[9] Dye, T. R., & Garcia, J. A. (1978). Structure, Function, and Policy in American Cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 14, 103-123.
[10] Elkin, S. L. (1987). City and Regime in the American Republic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[11] Frisby, W., Thibault, L., & Kikulis, L. (2004). The Organizational Dynamics of Under-Managed Partnerships in Leisure Service Departments. Leisure Studies, 23, 109-126.
[12] Hanley, B. (2003). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Arts Partnerships in Canadian Elementary Schools. Arts Education Policy Review, 104, 11-20.
[13] Hasson, S. (1996). The New Urban Order: Urban Coalitions in Israel. Jerusalem: The Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies. (In Hebrew)
[14] Hasson, S., & Hazan, A. (1997). Municipal-Private Partnership: Opportunities and Risks. Jerusalem: The Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies. (In Hebrew)
[15] Hebdon, R., & Jalette, P. (2008). The Restructuring of Municipal Services: A Canada-United States Comparison. Government and Policy, 26, 144-158.
[16] Hefetz, A., & Warner, M. (2007). Beyond the Market versus Planning Dichotomy: Understanding Privatization and Its Reverse in US Cities. Local Government Studies, 33, 555-572.
[17] Hurte, S. M. (2004). Profit at the Expense of Compliance? Assessing the Impact of Ownership Type on Compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, 15-18 April 2004.
[18] Katan, J. (2001). Implementation of a Privatization Policy in the Long-Term Care Community Services: Preliminary Conclusions. Social Security, 60, 129-155. (In Hebrew)
[19] Katan, J. (2004). Local Social Services: An Arena Crowded with Organizations. In Y. Kop (Ed.), Resource Allocation for the Social Services (pp. 171-190). Jerusalem: Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel. (In Hebrew)
[20] Kidd, D. (2002). Battle Lines at Toronto City Hall. Canadian Dimension, 36, 12.
[21] Kop, Y. (2004). Government Expenses for Social Services. In Y. Kop (Ed.), Resource Allocation for the Social Services (pp. 71). Jerusalem: Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel. (In Hebrew)
[22] Kuhlmann, S. (2008). Reforming Local Public Services: Trends and Effects in Germany and France. Public Management Review, 10, 573-596.
[23] Lake, R. W. (2002). Bring Back Big Government. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26, 815-822.
[24] Lamothe, S., Lamothe, M., & Feiock, R. C. (2008). Examining Local Government Service Delivery Arrangements over Time. Urban Affairs Review, 44, 27-56.
[25] Lev-Ari, L., & Pavin, A. (2006). Social Capital as a Stimulus to Development in the Periphery. Horizons in Geography, 6, 95-113. (In Hebrew)
[26] Ohemeng, F. K., & Grant, J. K. (2008). When Markets Fail to Deliver: An Examination of the Privatization and De-Privatization of Water and Wastewater Services Delivery in Hamilton, Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 51, 475-499.
[27] Razin, E. (2002). Fiscal Disparities among Local Authorities in Israel in the Year 2000: Continuity and Change in a Period of Political Instability. Jerusalem: The Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies. (In Hebrew)
[28] Razin, E. (2003). Local Government Reform in Israel: Between Centralization and Decentralization, between Traditionalism and Modernity. Jerusalem: The Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies. (In Hebrew)
[29] Razin, E., & Hazan, A. (2006). Redistributing Municipal Revenues: Fiscal Measures and Territorial Changes. Jerusalem: The Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies. (In Hebrew)
[30] Reese, L. A., & Rosenfeld, R. A. (2002). Reconsidering Private Sector Power: Business Input and Local Development Policy. Urban Affairs Review, 37, 642-674.
[31] Schmid, H. (2001). Nonprofit Organizations and For-Profit Organizations Providing Home Care Services to the Israeli Frail Elderly: A Comparative analysis. International Journal of Public Administration, 24, 1223-1265.
[32] Schwarz, R. (2003). Managing the Connection between Local Municipalities and Non-Profit Organizations. Jerusalem: JDC-ELKA. (In Hebrew)
[33] Silver, I. (2001). Poverty Reform through Philanthropic Initiative. Society, 38, 28-32.
[34] Stein, R. M. (1990). Urban Alternatives: Public and Private Markets in the Provision of Local Services. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
[35] Stone, C. N. (1980). Systemic Power and Community Decision Making: A Restatement of Stratification Theory. American Political Science Review, 74, 978-990.
[36] Stone, C. N. (2005). Looking Back to Look Forward: Reflections on Urban Regime Analysis. Urban Affairs Review, 40, 309-341.
[37] Thompson, S. (1992). Privatization-Possibly Positive Politics. American City & County, 107, 45-47.
[38] Warner, M. E. (2006). Market-Based Governance and the Challenge for Rural Governments: US Trends. Social Policy & Administration, 40, 612-631.
[39] Warner, M. E. (2009). Civic Government or Market-Based Governance? The Limits of Privatization for Rural Local Governments. Agriculture and Human Values, 26, 133-143.
[40] Warner, M. E., & Bel, G. (2008). Competition or Monopoly? Comparing Privatization of Local Public Services in the US and Spain. Public Administration Quarterly, 86, 723-735.
[41] Warner, M. E., & Hebdon, R. (2001). Local Government Restructuring: Privatization and Its Alternatives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 315-336.
[42] Warner, M. E., & Hefetz, A. (2008). Managing Markets for Public Service: The Role of Mixed Public-Private Delivery of City Services. Public Administration Review, 68, 155-166.

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.