Different Fetal and Neonatal Growth between Early- and Late-Onset Preeclampsia

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:273KB) PP. 516-521
DOI: 10.4236/ojog.2015.59074    2,231 Downloads   2,830 Views   Citations


Preeclampsia is a heterogeneous disease, and there are major differences in severity, fetal growth and poor placentation between early- and late-onset preeclampsia. Here, we examined the effect of onset period on fetal and neonatal growth in preeclampsia with a cross-sectional study including 102 pregnant women with preeclampsia visited Okayama University Hospital from 2009 to 2013. The subjects were retrospectively compared in terms of body mass index (BMI), weight gain during pregnancy, complications, weeks of delivery, neonatal body weight and BMI at birth, fetal growth restriction (FGR), small for gestational age (SGA), pathological findings in the placenta, and infant’s weight at 1 month after birth. Neonatal body weight and BMI at birth were significantly lower and the extent of FGR and the frequency of SGA were higher in early-onset group compared with late-onset group. Mean daily weight gain during the neonatal period was significantly lower in the early-onset group compared with the late-onset group, however the weight gain rate during the neonatal period in the early-onset group was higher than that in late-onset group. In conclusions, there are significant differences in fetal and neonatal growth between early- and late-onset preeclampsia and the catch up for growth might start during neonatal period.

Cite this paper

Mitsui, T. , Masuyama, H. , Eto, E. , Nobumoto, E. , Hayata, K. and Hiramatsu, Y. (2015) Different Fetal and Neonatal Growth between Early- and Late-Onset Preeclampsia. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5, 516-521. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2015.59074.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Davey, D.A. and Mac Gillivary, I. (1988) The Classification and Definition of the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 158, 892-898.
[2] Brown, M.A., Lindheimer, M.D., de Swiet, M., van Assche, A. and Moutquin, J.M. (2001) The Classification and Diagnosis of the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertention in Pregnancy, 20, 9-14.
[3] Sibai, B., Dekker, G. and Kupferminc, M. (2005) Pre-Eclampsia. Lancet, 365, 785-799.
[4] Aardema, M.W., Saro, M.C., Lander, M., de Wolf, B.T., Oosterhof, H. and Aarnoudse, J.G. (2004) Second Trimester Doppler Ultrasound Screening of the Uterine Arteries Differentiates between Subsequent Normal and Poor Outcomes of Hypertensive Pregnancy: Two Different Pathophysiological Entities? Clinical Science (London), 106, 377-382.
[5] Vatten, L.J. and Skjaerven, R. (2004) Is pre-Eclampsia More than One Disease? BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 111, 298-302.
[6] Masuyama, H., Segawa, T., Sumida, Y., Masumoto, A., Inoue, S., Akahori, Y. and Hiramatsu, Y. (2010) Different Profiles of Circulating Angiogenic Factors and Adipocytokines between Early- and Late Onset Preeclampsia. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 117, 314-320.
[7] Masuyama, H., Nobumoto, E., Inoue, S. and Hiramatsu, Y. (2010) Potential Interaction of Brain Natriuretic Peptide with Hyperadiponectinemia in Preeclampsia. American Journal of Physiology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, 302, E687-E693.
[8] Watanabe, K., Naruse, K., Tanaka, K., Metoki, H. and Suzuki, Y. (2013) Outline of Definition and Classification of “Pregnancy induced Hypertension (PIH)”. Hypertention Research in Pregnancy, 1, 3-4.
[9] Shinozuka, N., Okai, T., Kohzuma, S., Mukubo, M., Shih, C.T., Maeda, T., Kuwabara, Y. and Mizuno, M. (1987) Formulas for Fetal Weight Estimation by Ultrasound Measurements Based on Neonatal Specific Gravities and Volumes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 157, 1140-1145.
[10] Bonellie, S., Chalmers, J., Gray, R., Greer, I., Jarvis, S. and Williams, C. (2008) Centile Charts for Birthweight for Gestational Age for Scottish Singleton Births. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 8, 5.
[11] Visser, G.H., Eilers, P.H., Elferink-Stinkens, P.M., Merkus, H.M. and Wit, J.M. (2009) New Dutch Reference Curves for Birthweight by Gestational Age. Early Human Development, 85, 737-744.
[12] Olsen, I.E., Groveman, S.A., Lawson, M.L., Clark, R.H. and Zemel, B.S. (2010) New Intrauterine Growth Curves Based on United States Data. Pediatrics, 125, e214-e224.
[13] Cole, T.J. (1988) Fitting smoothed Centile Curves to Reference Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 151, 385-418.
[14] Benirschke, K. and Kaufmann, P. (2006) Pathology of the Human Placenta. 5th Edition, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 155-157.
[15] Hauth, J.C., Ewell, M.G., Levine, R.J., Esterlitz, J.R., Sibai, B., Curet, L.B., Catalano, P.M. and Morris, C.D. (2000) Pregnancy Outcomes in Healthy Nulliparas Who Developed Hypertension. Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention Study Group. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 95, 24-28.
[16] Buchbinder, A., Sibai, B.M. and Caritis, S. (2002) Adverse Perinatal Outcomes Are Significantly Higher In Severe Gestational Hypertension than in Mild Preeclampsia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186, 66-71.
[17] Godfrey, K.M. and Barker, D.J. (2000) Fetal Nutrition and Adult Disease. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71, 1344-1352.
[18] Stettler, N., Zemel, B.S., Kumanyika, S. and Stallings, V.A. (2002) Infant Weight Gain and Childhood Overweight Status in a Multicenter, Cohort Study. Pediatrics, 109, 194-199.

comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2020 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.