Evaluation and Selection of High Biomass Rice (Oryza sativa L.) for Drought Tolerance

Aditi Kondhia, Rodante Escleto Tabien, Amir Ibrahim

Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension, Texas A&M University, Beaumont, USA.

DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2015.612197                

Abstract

Biomass production is important in increasing yield not only for food but also for bio-fuel production that depends on high dry matter. Due to climate change, occurrence of drought may be prevalent and this affects both grain and biomass yields in crops including rice. The objectives of this study were to determine the performance of selected high biomass breeding rice lines to different levels of drought and use several drought tolerance indices to identify best genotypes that could be grown in unfavorable water stressed areas. A rainfed and flooded trial was conducted to evaluate 20 selected breeding lines for biomass production and ten entries from the same set were grown in the greenhouse at three different field capacities (FC, 50%, 75%, 100%). Most of the genotypes performed well under non-stressed conditions (flooded and 100% FC) but some genotypes performed well in water stressed condition. The plants had lower plant height, tiller plant^-1, and total biomass at maturity under rainfed conditions and their flowering was delayed compared to flooded conditions. In the greenhouse, water stress slowed the rate of increase in height, and produced lower shoot and root weight, percent dry matter (% DM) and total biomass. However, drought enhanced the rate of tiller production. Two genotypes were found to more tolerant to drought stress and could be used for cultivation under water stress condition to get optimum biomass yields. These genotypes can be identified using drought tolerance indices, particularly stress tolerance index (STI), geometric mean productivity (GMP), mean productivity (MP) and harmonic mean (HARM), as these have a similar ability to separate drought sensitive and tolerant genotypes. Genetic and molecular analyses, and detailed characterization of these genotypes will help understand their inheritance pattern and the number of genes controlling the traits and determine specific leaves and root traits important in developing high biomass rice.

Keywords

High Biomass Rice, Water Stress, Selection Indices

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Mae, T. (1997) Physiological Nitrogen Efficiency in Rice: Nitrogen Utilization, Photosynthesis, and Yield Potential. In: Plant Nutrition for Sustainable Food Production and Environment, Springer, Berlin, 51-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0047-9_5
[2]	GRiSP (Global Rice Science Partnership) (2013) Rice Almanac. 4th Edition, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños.
[3]	Pandey, S. and Bhandari, H. (2008) Crop Improvement for Increased Rainfed Production.
[4]	NCAR (2005) Drought’s Growing Reach: NCAR Study Points to Global Warming as Key Factor. http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2005/drought_research.shtml
[5]	Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Lee, D.-J., Ito, O. and Siddique, K.H. (2009) Advances in Drought Resistance of Rice. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 28, 199-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07352680902952173
[6]	Long, S.P. and Ort, D.R. (2010) More than Taking the Heat: Crops and Global Change. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 13, 240-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2010.04.008
[7]	Chaudhry, M. and McLean, E. (1963) Comparative Effects of Flooded and Unflooded Soil Conditions and Nitrogen Application on Growth and Nutrient Uptake by Rice Plants. Agronomy Journal, 55, 565-567. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1963.00021962005500060019x
[8]	Xiao, B., Huang, Y., Tang, N. and Xiong, L. (2007) Over-Expression of a LEA Gene in Rice Improves Drought Resistance under the Field Conditions. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 115, 35-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-007-0538-9
[9]	Lim, J.S., Manan, Z.A., Alwi, S.R.W. and Hashim, H. (2012) A Review on Utilisation of Biomass from Rice Industry as a Source of Renewable Energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 3084-3094. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.051
[10]	Kirubakaran, V., Sivaramakrishnan, V., Nalini, R., Sekar, T., Premalatha, M. and Subramanian, P. (2009) A Review on Gasification of Biomass. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 179-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.001
[11]	Werther, J., Saenger, M., Hartge, E.-U., Ogada, T. and Siagi, Z. (2000) Combustion of Agricultural Residues. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 26, 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1285(99)00005-2
[12]	Nazari, L. and Pakniyat, H. (2010) Assessment of Drought Tolerance in Barley Genotypes. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10, 151-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/jas.2010.151.156
[13]	Fernandez, G.C. (1992) Effective Selection Criteria for Assessing Plant Stress Tolerance. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, Taiwan, 13-18 August 1992, 257-270.
[14]	Rosielle, A. and Hamblin, J. (1981) Theoretical Aspects of Selection for Yield in Stress and Non-Stress Environment. Crop Science, 21, 943-946. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x
[15]	Fischer, R. and Maurer, R. (1978) Drought Resistance in Spring Wheat Cultivars. I. Grain Yield Responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 29, 897-912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897
[16]	Tabien, R.E., Samonte, S.O.P.B., Harper, C.L., Frank, P.M., Pace, J.V. and Wilson, L.T. (2005) Inheritance of Number of Leaves and Tillers, Rates of Leaf and Tiller Production. Abstracts, 65. http://www.irri.org/rg5/Abstracts.pdf
[17]	Mostajeran, A. and Rahimi-Eichi, V. (2009) Effects of Drought Stress on Growth and Yield of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars and Accumulation of Proline and Soluble Sugars in Sheath and Blades of Their Different Ages Leaves. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 5, 264-272.
[18]	Guevarra, A. and Chang, T. (1965) Internode Elongation in Rice Varieties of Reduced Plant Stature. The Philippine Agricultural Scientist, 49, 23-42.
[19]	Bunnag, S. and Pongthai, P. (2013) Selection of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars Tolerant to Drought Stress at the Vegetative Stage under Field Conditions. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 4, 1701-1708. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.49207
[20]	Price, A., Steele, K., Gorham, J., Bridges, J., Moore, B., Evans, J., Richardson, P. and Jones, R. (2002) Upland Rice Grown in Soil-Filled Chambers and Exposed to Contrasting Water-Deficit Regimes: I. Root Distribution, Water Use and Plant Water Status. Field Crops Research, 76, 11-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00012-6
[21]	Suralta, R.R. and Yamauchi, A. (2008) Root Growth, Aerenchyma Development, and Oxygen Transport in Rice Genotypes Subjected to Drought and Waterlogging. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 64, 75-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.01.004
[22]	Sinaki, J., Heravan, E.M., Rad, A.S., Noormohammadi, G. and Zarei, G. (2007) The Effects of Water Deficit during Growth Stages of Canola (Brassica napus L.). American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science, 2, 417-422.
[23]	Zubaer, M., Chowdhury, A., Islam, M., Ahmed, T. and Hasan, M. (2007) Effects of Water Stress on Growth and Yield Attributes of Aman Rice Genotypes. International Journal of Sustainable Crop Production, 2, 25-30.
[24]	Samson, B. and Wade, L. (1998) Soil Physical Constraints Affecting Root Growth, Water Extraction, and Nutrient Uptake in Rainfed Lowland Rice. In: Ladha, J.K., Wade, L.J., Dobermann, A., Reichardt, W., Kirk, G. and Piggin, C., Eds., Rainfed Lowland Rice: Advances in Nutrient Management Research, International Rice Research Institute, Manila, 231-244.
[25]	Zhang, J. and Kirkham, M. (1996) Enzymatic Responses of the Ascorbate-Glutathione Cycle to Drought in Sorghum and Sunflower Plants. Plant Science, 113, 139-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(95)04295-4
[26]	Christmann, A., Weiler, E.W., Steudle, E. and Grill, E. (2007) A Hydraulic Signal in Root-to-Shoot Signalling of Water Shortage. The Plant Journal, 52, 167-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03234.x
[27]	Matsuo, N., Nhan, D.Q. and Mochizuki, T. (2007) Effect of Deep Tillage on Growth and Yield of Rice Cultivars Grown under Water Deficit. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 52, 331-336.
[28]	Kamoshita, A. and Abe, J. (2007) Growth of Rice Plants (Oryza sativa L.) under Non-Flooded Water-Saving Paddy Fields. Agricultural Journal, 2, 375-383.
[29]	Patel, D., Das, A., Munda, G., Ghosh, P., Bordoloi, J.S. and Kumar, M. (2010) Evaluation of Yield and Physiological Attributes of High-Yielding Rice Varieties under Aerobic and Flood-Irrigated Management Practices in Mid-Hills Ecosystem. Agricultural Water Management, 97, 1269-1276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.02.018
[30]	Owusu-Sekyere, J.D. (2005) Water Table Control for Rice Production in Ghana. Master’s Thesis, Cranfield University, Silsoe.
[31]	Bouman, B. and Tuong, T.P. (2001) Field Water Management to Save Water and Increase Its Productivity in Irrigated Lowland Rice. Agricultural Water Management, 49, 11-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00128-1
[32]	Lilley, J. and Fukai, S. (1994) Effect of Timing and Severity of Water Deficit on Four Diverse Rice Cultivars I. Rooting Pattern and Soil Water Extraction. Field Crops Research, 37, 205-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(94)90099-X
[33]	Yan, J., Yu, J., Tao, G.C., Vos, J., Bouman, B., Xie, G.H. and Meinke, H. (2010) Yield Formation and Tillering Dynamics of Direct-Seeded Rice in Flooded and Nonflooded Soils in the Huai River Basin of China. Field Crops Research, 116, 252-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.01.002
[34]	Golbashy, M., Ebrahimi, M., Khorasani, S.K. and Choukan, R. (2010) Evaluation of Drought Tolerance of Some Corn (Zea mays L.) Hybrids in Iran. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5, 2714-2719.
[35]	Jafari, A., Paknejad, F. and Al-Ahmadi, M.J. (2009) Evaluation of Selection Indices for Drought Tolerance of Corn (Zea mays L.) Hybrids. International Journal of Plant Production, 3, 33-38.