Evaluation of the Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System in Beitbridge District, Zimbabwe 2015

Juru P. Tsitsi¹, Ncube Nomagugu², Notion T. Gombe¹, Mufuta Tshimanga¹, Bangure Donewell^1*, More Mungati¹, Chikodzore Rudo³

¹Department of Community Medicine, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
²International Organization for Migration, Lusaka, Zambia.
³Provincial Medical Directorate, Matabeleland South, Zimbabwe.

DOI: 10.4236/ojepi.2015.53024                

Abstract

Back ground: Notifiable Disease Surveillance system serves as an early warning system for public health emergencies. Since January 2013 to August 2014, Beitbridge never submitted T2 forms to the province. Four suspected cases of rabies were reported through the generic report. The electronic District Health Information System 2, T2 forms had not been updated. This discrepancy may imply under reporting of Notifiable Diseases. The study was conducted to evaluate the NDSS in Beitbridge district. Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. Health workers in sampled health facilities were interviewed using questionnaires. Checklists were used to assess resource availability. Epi Info^TM was used to calculate frequencies and proportions. Results: From 11 facilities, 53 respondents were interviewed of which the 59% were females. For Knowledge, 57% recalled at least 9 Notifiable diseases, 11% knew the T1 form required to notify. Respondents willing to participate in the NDSS were 87%. Responsibility to notify was placed other health workers other than themselves by 55% of the respondents. All facilities did not have completed T1 forms. T1 forms were available in 1/11 health facilities. Three outbreaks were reported using the Weekly Disease Surveillance System (WDSS). NDSS information was used for planning and mobilizing resources for indoor residual spraying. It costs an average $12.15 to notify a single case, against $1.50 if it was electronic. Conclusion: NDSS is acceptable, simple, flexible, unstable, not sensitive and useful. Reasons for under reporting were lack of forms, lack of induction and poor knowledge on the NDSS. The cost of operating the NDSS could be reduced if the system is electronic. T1 forms and guidelines for completing the forms should be distributed to all health facilities. On the job training of health workers through tutorials, supervision is recommended.

Keywords

Evaluation, Notifiable Disease Surveillance, Beitbridge, Zimbabwe

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Framework for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems for Early Detection of Outbreaks Recommendations from the CDC Working Group: MMWR, Recommendations and Reports, 1-35.
[2]	Government of Zimbabwe. Public Health Act.
[3]	Technical Guidelines for Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response in the African Region October 2010.
[4]	Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare (1989) National Health Information System User’s Manual. Harare Government Printers.
[5]	CDC (2001) Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems: Recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR Recommendations and Reports, 50, 1-35.
[6]	Maponga, B.A., Chirundu, D., Shambira, G., Gombe, N.T., Tshimanga, M. and Bangure, D. (2014) Evaluation of the Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System in Sanyati District, Zimbabwe, 2010-2011. The Pan African Medical Journal, 19, 278. http://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/19/278/full
[7]	Bawa, S.B., Olumide, E.A. and Umar, U.S. (2003) The Knowledge, Attitude and Practices of the Reporting of Notifiable Diseases among Health Workers in Yobe State, Nigeria. African Journal of Medicine and Medical Science, 32, 49-53. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15030066
[8]	Doyle, T.J., Kathleen Glynn, M. and Groseclose, S.L. (2002) Completeness of Notifiable Infectious Disease Reporting in the United States: An Analytical Literature Review. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155, 866-874. http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/155/9/866.full.pdf+html
[9]	Sibanda, C., Gombe, N.T. and Hazangue, P. (2010) Evaluation of the T1 Surveillance in Tsholotsho District Matabeleland North, Zimbabwe. (Unpublished)
[10]	Bawa, S.B., et al. (2005) The Effect of Training on the Reporting or Notifiable Diseases among Health Workers in Yobe District, Nigeria. The Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal, 12, 1-5.
[11]	Salim, S., Karim, A. and Dilraj, A. (1996) Reasons for Under-Reporting of Notifiable Conditions. South African Medical Journal, 86, 834-836.
[12]	Al-Hashimi, D.A., Al-Roomi, K. and Al-Sayyad, A.S. (2014) Reasons for Under-Reporting of Notifiable Communicable Diseases in the Kingdom of Bahrain: Health-Centers Based Survey. Journal of the Bahrain Medical Society, 25, 75-79.