The Level of Multiple Intelligences in  Arabic Language Textbooks for Grades  from (1 - 4) in Jordan in Light of  Gardner’s Theory

Saleh Mohammad Abu Jado

doi:10.4236/ce.2015.614156

Home > Journals > Social Sciences & Humanities > CE

Creative Education > Vol.6 No.14, August 2015

The Level of Multiple Intelligences in Arabic Language Textbooks for Grades from (1 - 4) in Jordan in Light of Gardner’s Theory ()

Saleh Mohammad Abu Jado

Faculty of Educational Sciences and Arts/UNRWA, Amman, Jordan.

DOI: 10.4236/ce.2015.614156 PDF HTML XML 4,517 Downloads 5,759 Views Citations

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the level of inclusion and balance of multiple intelligences in the Arabic Language textbooks in light of Gardner’s Theory using the analytical descriptive approach. Eight textbooks in grades (1 - 4) for the first and second semesters were taught in schools in the Jordanian educational system in 2013/2014. The selected textbooks were analyzed using Multiple Intelligences (MI) checklist devised by the researcher based on the framework of the Theory of Multiple Intelligences to examine them in relation to different intelligences as reflected through various activities, questions and tasks. The study sample consisted of all Arabic Language textbooks for the grades from 1 - 4. Results of the study showed that the verbal/linguistic intelligence in the textbooks in general scored the highest frequency amongst all types of intelligence; meanwhile the musical intelligence in the textbooks scored the lowest frequency among all types of intelligence. The study concluded with a recommendation to consider the necessity of employing all types of intelligence in designing Arabic language textbooks for young learners.

Keywords

Gardner, Multiple Intelligences, Arabic Language, Textbooks, Jordan

Share and Cite:

Jado, S. (2015) The Level of Multiple Intelligences in Arabic Language Textbooks for Grades from (1 - 4) in Jordan in Light of Gardner’s Theory. Creative Education, 6, 1558-1572. doi: 10.4236/ce.2015.614156.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Al-Shboul, A., & Al-Khawaldeh, N. (2014). Analysis of Islamic Education Textbooks in Jordan in Light of Intelligences Theory. The Jordanian Journal of Educational Sciences, 10, 293-304.
[2]	Al-Tawalbeh, H. M. (2007). Analysis of the Tenth Grade History Textbook on the Basis of Multiple Intelligences and Measuring the Effect of a Developed Unit on Students’ Intelligences and Achievement. Unpublished Dissertation, Irbid: Yarmouk University.
[3]	Arikan, A., Soydan, E., & Isler, O. (2014). A Study of Two English Language Course Books in Turkey: Focus on Multiple Intelligences. Journal of Education, 1, 27-33.
[4]	Armstrong, T. (1994) Multiple Intelligences: Seven Ways to Approach Curriculum. Educational Leadership, 52, 26-28.
[5]	Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
[6]	Arnold, J., & Fonseca, C. M. (2004). Multiple Intelligence Theory and Foreign Language Learning: A Brain-Based Perspective. International Journal of English Studies, 4, 119-136.
[7]	Botelho, M. R. (2003). Multiple Intelligences Theory in English Teaching: An Analysis of current Textbooks, Materials and Teachers’ Perceptions. Unpublished Thesis, Athens, OH: Ohio University.
[8]	Campbell, I. M. (2000). The Unspoken Dialogue: Beliefs about Intelligence, Students, and Instruction Held by a Sample of Teachers Familiar with the Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Santa Barbara, CA: The Fielding Institute.
[9]	Ehrman, M. E., (2003). A Brief Overview of Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. System, 31, 313-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00045-9
[10]	Estaji, M., & Nafisi, M. (2014). Multiple Intelligences and Their Representation in the EFL Young Learners’ Textbooks. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 3, 61-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2014.731
[11]	Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind. New York: Basic Books.
[12]	Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic Books.
[13]	Goodenough, K. (2000). Exploring Multiple Intelligences Theory in the Context of Science Education: An Action Research Approach. UMI Dissertations. http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/preview_all/NQ4985
[14]	Griggs, L., Barney, S., Brown-Sederberg, J., Collins, E., Keith, S., & Iannacci, L. (2009). Varying Pedagogy to Address Student Multiple Intelligences. Human Architecture, 7, 55-60. http://search.proquest.com/docview/210172456?accountid=14129
[15]	Hoerr, T. (2000). Becoming a Multiple Intelligences School. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
[16]	Hou, Y.-A. (2010). Multiple Intelligences and Foreign Language Learning: A Case Study in Taiwan. The International Journal of the Humanities, 8, 77-106.
[17]	Hyland, A. (2011). Multiple Intelligences: Curriculum and Assessment Project (Final Report 2000). Education Department, University College Cork, Digitized Version. The National Academy for Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning.
[18]	Johnson, M. (2007). An Extended Literature Review: The Effect of Multiple Intelligences on Elementary Student Performance. Unpublished Thesis, San Rafael, CA: Dominican University of California.
[19]	Kelly, D. (2005). On the Dynamic Multiple Intelligence Informed Personalization of the Learning Environment. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Dublin: University of Dublin, Trinity College.
[20]	McFarlane, D. A. (2011). Multiple Intelligences: The Most Effective Platform for Global 21st Century Educational and Instructional Methodologies. College Quarterly, 14, 1-8.
[21]	Naoe, G. D. (2010). The Multiple Intelligences of Grade V Pupils: Bases for the Proposed Learning Enhancement Program of David Elementary School. E-International Scientific Research Journal, 2, 90-109.
[22]	Nasiri, M., Ketabi, S., & Dastjerdi, H. (2012). Multiple Intelligences in Locally-Published ELT Textbooks in Iran. Modern Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4, 258-266.
[23]	Okebukola, F., & Owolabi, T. (2009). Improving the Reading Ability of Science Students through Study Groups and Multiple Intelligences. US-China Education Review, 6, 38-43.
[24]	Palmberg, R. (2001). Catering for Multiple Intelligences in EFL coursebooks. HLT Magazine, January 2002. http://www.htlmag.co.uk/Jan02/sart6htm
[25]	Razmijo, S. A., & Jozaghi, Z. (2010). Multiple Intelligences, Student-Centered Learning: Textbooks Evaluation. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14, 59-84.
[26]	Richards, J. C. (2001). The Role of Textbooks in a Language Program. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://www.cup.org.br/articles/articles_21.html
[27]	Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT Textbooks and Materials. ELT Journal, 42, 237-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.4.237
[28]	Silver, H., Strong, R., & Perini, M. (1997). Integrating Learning Styles and Multiple Intelligences. Educational Leadership, 55, 22-27.
[29]	Snider, D. P. (2001). Multiple Intelligences Theory and Foreign Language Teaching. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah.
[30]	Stefanakis, E. H. (2002). Multiple Intelligences and Portfolios: A Window into the Learner’s Mind. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
[31]	Tahriri, A., & Divsar, H. (2011). EFL Learner’s Self-Perceived Strategy Use across Various Intelligence Types: A Case Study. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 15, 115-138.
[32]	Weiner, A. G. (2001). Investigating Commonalities among Elementary Schools That Have Implemented the Theory of Multiple Intelligences: A Guideline for the 21st Century. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University.
[33]	White, N., Blythe, T., & Gardner, H. (1995) Multiple Intelligences Theory: Creating the Thoughtful Classroom. In R. Fogarty, J. Bellanca, & M. Hauker (Eds), Multiple Intelligences: A Collection. Melbourne: Hawker Brownlow Education.
[34]	Zarei, A., & Mohseni, F. (2012). On the Relationship between Multiple Intelligences and Grammatical and Writing Accuracy of Iranian Learners of English. US-China Foreign Language, 10, 1306-1317.