Share This Article:

YeaNay: An Open Source Tool to Rate the Votes of Members of the United States House of Representatives and Senate

Abstract Full-Text HTML XML Download Download as PDF (Size:1260KB) PP. 277-283
DOI: 10.4236/ojps.2015.54029    3,745 Downloads   4,194 Views  

ABSTRACT

Government transparency is typically regarded as the most viable way to strengthen its accountability to the public (Shkabatur, 2012). Even on the international stage, the right to access government information is regarded as fundamental to democracy (Bertot, Jaeger, & Grimes, 2011). In order to improve transparency, the US government made data, like bills and votes, available online (Brito, 2008b). One popular way to organize the data available to the public is through the creation of voter guides. The method an organization used for developing a voter guide was analyzed for this project. In response to the method, a web application (YeaNay) was developed to take the largely manual process and make a highly automated solution. YeaNay utilizes HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to build the user interface and ColdFusion and PL/SQL to query the data necessary for the development of a voter guide. The data are queried either from the database or from Congress API v3 (provided by the Sunlight Foundation). One user, with minimal training, is able to use YeaNay to find and score legislation within minutes for use in a voter guide. YeaNay focuses the firehose of congressional information that is now available and presents it in a manageable and usable environment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cite this paper

Venlet, E. and Adams, D. (2015) YeaNay: An Open Source Tool to Rate the Votes of Members of the United States House of Representatives and Senate. Open Journal of Political Science, 5, 277-283. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2015.54029.

References

[1] Arizona Republic (2010). Government Transparency Needed.
[2] Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & McClure, C. R. (2008). User-Centered E-Government Services: Benefits, Costs, and Research Needs. Paper Presented at the 9th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research.
[3] Bertot, J., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2011). Promoting Transparency and Accountability through ICTs, Social Media, and Collaborative E-Government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6, 78-91.
[4] Brito, J. (2008a). Improving Government Transparency Online. Public Manager, 37, 22-26.
[5] Brito, J. (2008b). Hack, Mash, & Peer: Crowdsourcing Government Transparency. Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, 9, 119-122.
[6] Chun, S. A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: Making Connections between Citizens, Data and Government. Information Polity, 15, 1-9.
[7] Dawes, S. S., & Helbig, N. (2010). Information Strategies for Open Government: Challenges and Prospects for Deriving Public Value from Government Transparency. In M. A. Wimmer, J.-L. Chappelet, M. Janssen, & H. J. Scholl (Eds.), Electronic Government (pp. 50-60). Berlin: Springer.
[8] Jaeger, P. T., & Bertot, J. C. (2010). Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating User-Centered and Citizen-Centered E-Government. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 6, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2010040101
[9] Shkabatur, J. (2012). Transparency With(out) Accountability: Open Government in the United States (March 25, 2012). Yale Law & Policy Review, 31, 79-140.

  
comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2019 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.