Impacts of Exchange Rate Volatility and FDI on Technical Efficiency—A Case Study of Vietnamese Agricultural Sector

Nguyen Khac Minh; Pham Van Khanh; Nguyen Viet Hung

doi:10.4236/ajor.2015.54025

Home > Journals > Physics & Mathematics > AJOR

American Journal of Operations Research > Vol.5 No.4, July 2015

Impacts of Exchange Rate Volatility and FDI on Technical Efficiency—A Case Study of Vietnamese Agricultural Sector ()

Nguyen Khac Minh¹, Pham Van Khanh², Nguyen Viet Hung³

¹Economics and Management Faculty, Thang Long University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
²Institute of Economics and Corporate Group, Hanoi, Vietnam.
³Faculty of Economics, National Economics University, Hanoi, Vietnam.

DOI: 10.4236/ajor.2015.54025 PDF HTML XML 3,050 Downloads 3,707 Views Citations

Abstract

The objective of this research is to examine impacts of exchange rate volatility and FDI on efficiency of the Vietnamese agricultural sector at the provincial level for the period 1998-2011. Due to the characteristic of high uncertainty in agricultural production, the chance-constrained programming model would be used to estimate efficiency of the agricultural production sector. In order to study impacts of exchange rate volatility and FDI, we employ the two-stage model. In the first stage, we use the chance-constrained programming model to measure technical efficiency and ARIMA model to quantify exchange rate volatility. In the second stage, we use the fixed effect model to evaluate impacts of exchange rate volatility and FDI on efficiency of agricultural production in poor and rich provinces. The estimated results show that fluctuation in exchange rate volatility would reduce efficiency in agricultural production but FDI has an insignificant impact on the efficient production in Vietnam agricultural sector.

Keywords

Chance-Constrained Programming, DEA, Exchange Rate Volatility, FDI, Technical Efficiency

Share and Cite:

Minh, N. , Khanh, P. and Hung, N. (2015) Impacts of Exchange Rate Volatility and FDI on Technical Efficiency—A Case Study of Vietnamese Agricultural Sector. American Journal of Operations Research, 5, 317-325. doi: 10.4236/ajor.2015.54025.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Minh, N.K. and Long, G.T. (2009) Efficiency Estimates for the Agricultural Production in Vietnam: A Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Approaches. Agricultural Economics Review, 10, 62-78.
[2]	Minh, N.K. and Khanh, P.V. (2011) A Chance-Constrained Data Envelopment Analysis Approach to Problem Provincial Productivity Growth in Vietnamese Agriculture from 1995 to 2007. Open Journal of Statistics, 1, 217-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2011.13026
[3]	Ethier, W. (1973) International Trade and the Forward Exchange Market. American Economic Review, 63, 494-503.
[4]	Clark, P.B. (1973) Uncertainty, Exchange Risk, and the Level of International Trade. Western Economic Journal, 11, 302-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1973.tb01063.x
[5]	Demers, M. (1991) Investment under Uncertainty, Irreversibility and the Arrival of Information over Time. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 333-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2297971
[6]	Caves, R. (1974) Multinational Firms, Competition and Productivity in the Host Country. Economics, 41, 176-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2553765
[7]	Caves, R. (1996) Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[8]	Findlay, R. (1978) Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment and the Transfer of Technology: A Simple Dynamic Model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92, 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1885996
[9]	Borensztein, E.J., DeGregorio, J. and Lee, J.W. (1998) How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth? Journal of International Economics, 45, 115-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00033-0
[10]	Rappaport, J. (2000) How Does Openness to Capital Flows Affect Growth? Research Working Paper, RWP00-11, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
[11]	Noorzoy, M.S. (1979) Flows of Direct Investment and Their Effects on Investment in Canada. Economic Letters, 2, 257-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(79)90032-6
[12]	Van Loo, F. (1977) The Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Investment in Canada. Review of Economics and Statistics, 59, 474-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1928712
[13]	De Mello Jr., L. (1999) Foreign Direct Investment-Led Growth: Evidence from Time Series and Panel Data. Oxford Economic Papers, 51, 133-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oep/51.1.133
[14]	Land, K.C., Knox Lovell, C.A. and Thore, S. (1993) Chance-Constrained Data Envelopment Analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics, 14, 541-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090140607
[15]	Copper, W.W., Deng, H.Z., Huang, Z. and Li, S.X. (2004) Chance Constrained Programming Approaches to Congestion in Stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operation Research, 155, 487-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00901-3
[16]	Chen, T. (2002) A Comparison of Chance-Constrained DEA and Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Bank Efficiency in Taiwan. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53, 492-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601318
[17]	Thursby, M.C. and Thursby, J.G. (1985) The Uncertainty Effects of Floating Exchange Rates: Empirical Evidence on International Trade Flows. Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, 153-166.
[18]	McIvor, R. (1995) Exchange Rate Variability and Australia’s Export Performance.
[19]	McKenzie, M. and Brooks, R. (1997) The Impact of Exchange Rate Volatility on German-US Trade Flows. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 7, 73-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1042-4431(97)00012-7