Preservice Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy and Its Sources
Sunjin Oh
DOI: 10.4236/psych.2011.23037   PDF   HTML     8,920 Downloads   17,307 Views   Citations


The purpose of this study was to examine several potential sources of preservice teachers’ perceptions of their teaching efficacy during their reading and writing lessons. More specifically, the study explored the relationship between the sources of preservice teachers’ self-efficacy and teachers’ perception of efficacy in the areas of instructional strategies, classroom management, and student engagement. Forty-three preservice teachers in pre-literacy methods courses and fourteen in post-literacy methods courses completed the survey, which consisted of the Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES) and Teaching Efficacy Sources Inventory. Paired t-test results showed that preservice teachers’ teaching efficacy increased in the three subscales of instructional strategies, classroom management, and student engagement by the end of the literacy method courses. Efficacy for instructional strategies, classroom management, and student engagement were highly intercorrelated with each other in the pre-test data. The results of multiple regression analysis indicated that personality characteristics, capabilities, motivation, enactive mastery experiences with social/verbal persuasion, and physiological/affective state were significant predictors when efficacy for classroom management was the dependent variable in the post-test data. Findings of this study revealed that preservice teachers’ personality, motivation, and capabilities were one of the important sources to improve their teaching efficacy, in congruence with previous research (Poulou, 2007; Yeung & Watkins, 2000).

Share and Cite:

Oh, S. (2011). Preservice Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy and Its Sources. Psychology, 2, 235-240. doi: 10.4236/psych.2011.23037.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


[1] Anderson, S., & Betz, N. (2001). Sources of social self-efficacy expectations: Their measurement and relation to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 98-117. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2000.1753
[2] Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
[3] Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
[4] Chan, D. W. (2008). General, collective, and domain-specific teacher self-efficacy among Chinese prospective and in-service teachers in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1057-1069. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.11.010
[5] Dembo, M. H., & Gibson, S. (1985). Teachers’ sense of efficacy: An important factor in school improvement. The Elementary School Journal, 86, 173-184. doi:10.1086/461441
[6] Erdle, S., Murray, H. G., & Rushton, J. P. (1985). Personality, classroom behavior, and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 394-407. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.77.4.394
[7] Henson, R. K. (2001, February). Relationships between preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, task analysis, and classroom management beliefs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
[8] Poulou, M. (2007). Personal teaching efficacy and its sources: student teachers’ perceptions. Educational Psychology, 27, 191-218. doi:10.1080/01443410601066693
[9] Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
[10] Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944-956. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
[11] US Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2002). No Child Left Behind: A desktop reference. Washington, DC.
[12] Yeung, K. W, & Watkins, D. (2000). Hong Kong student teachers’ personal construction of teaching efficacy. Educational Psychology, 20, 213-235. doi:10.1080/713663713

Copyright © 2022 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

Creative Commons License

This work and the related PDF file are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.